Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
Sore Feet Member
Joined: 16 Dec 2001 Posts: 6304 | TRs | Pics Location: Out There, Somewhere |
NacMacFeegle wrote: | Processor (CPU):
Definitely look for an Intel chip, I'm not a fan of AMD. The best bang for your buck is hands down the latest intel core-i5; i3's and i7's are great, but when it comes to price to performance ratios the i5 wins every time. If you really need to save money though the i3 will work just fine, and if you need a lot of power and are willing to shell out big bucks to get it an i7 will be great. |
I'm gonna chime in on this a bit. This isn't going to be a terribly big deal if you're not a power user or serious gamer, and even then it may not be nearly as big of a deal as it may seem. Intel does have the best processors out there for sure, but they're also way more expensive than AMD's offerings, which can get you about 90% of the performance for as much as one third of the price of Intel's chips (when you're buying desktop equipment at least).
I'm a fairly prolific gamer (not hardcore though), and I've always bought AMD chips mainly because I've usually been somewhat budget conscious and could never quite justify to myself spending $2-300 on a processor when a $80-100 one would get me 'good enough' level of performance for my need. If you don't game, and you don't utilize programs that can take advantage of Intel's multi-threading support, then AMD's chips are more than fine and will save you a pretty significant chunk of change (the corresponding motherboards are cheaper than Inter chipset boards too).
|
Back to top |
|
|
NacMacFeegle Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2014 Posts: 2653 | TRs | Pics Location: United States |
I've had pretty poor experience with AMD over the years; the one time I used an AMD cpu it died on me fairly quickly, and when I got an AMD GPU a few years ago it also failed in an unfortunately short amount of time. Obviously other people haven't had a problem with them, but for me the extra cost of Intel is worth it for the increased reliability and longevity that I have observed. Additionally, if you are doing a lot of photo editing you'll really appreciate the extra power. Perhaps the most important argument I could make in favor of Intel (especially in a laptop) is that they are far and away more power-efficient than AMD, so you will get much longer battery life than with an AMD chip. However, if you really need to buy within a strict budget, but still want a powerful machine, then AMD might be a good option.
mike wrote: | And I consider 1200 vertical a minimum resolution for a monitor if you do anything besides watching videos.. 1080 is just too squatty for me. And go IPS. There are some really nice 24" 1920x1200 IPS monitors out there for hardly more $$ than the short squatty TN's. And more/bigger is better. |
IPS is definitely better, and indeed are not that much more than a TN. For everyone but hardcore gamers (who need the 1 or 2 millisecond response times afforded by TN panels) they are definitely the superior option. I personally prefer wider panels, and if I could afford it I would definitely look into getting something with an even wider aspect ration like 21:9. I just like the way wide aspect ratios immerse you in the screen.
RandyHiker wrote: | If you are a CostCo member -- they have a good selection of laptops from low-priced models to ridiculous gaming/desktop replacement machines. Because of their generous return policy, you can buy one, use it for 89 days and if you aren't happy with it, return it for a full refund -- Most machines now have "reset to factory" feature -- so wiping off all your stuff doesn't involve a lot of pain and suffering on your part anymore. |
Costco's return policy is excellent! It's just a pity they have such a limited variety of any given item, so if they have what you want-perfect, if not-too bad.
RandyHiker wrote: | The newly announced Surface Book looks pretty sweet -- but definitely a premium price tag. |
I wanted that thing as soon as I saw it-up until I saw the sticker price! If I had that kind of money I'd probably put towards something more powerful than the Surface, like the Razer Blade or a laptop from one of the high end custom PC manufacturers like Origin or Alienware. The MS Surface pro tablets are interesting though, and seem to be (somewhat) reasonably priced.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Randito Snarky Member
Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9495 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
|
Randito
Snarky Member
|
Tue Nov 17, 2015 7:41 pm
|
|
|
NacMacFeegle wrote: | For everyone but hardcore gamers (who need the 1 or 2 millisecond response times afforded by TN panels) |
HaHa -- you mean who get suckered into thinking they do.
Quote: | Titanfall On Xbox One Is 792p, 57fps |
60 frames per second ~= 16 milliseconds per frame.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Randito Snarky Member
Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9495 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
|
Randito
Snarky Member
|
Tue Nov 17, 2015 7:50 pm
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
NacMacFeegle Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2014 Posts: 2653 | TRs | Pics Location: United States |
RandyHiker wrote: | NacMacFeegle wrote: | For everyone but hardcore gamers (who need the 1 or 2 millisecond response times afforded by TN panels) |
HaHa -- you mean who get suckered into thinking they do. |
It's probably just a placebo, most people say you can't tell the difference.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bedivere Why Do Witches Burn?
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 7464 | TRs | Pics Location: The Hermitage |
|
Bedivere
Why Do Witches Burn?
|
Tue Nov 17, 2015 10:14 pm
|
|
|
This 5 year old workstation I'm typing this on was built for photo and video processing and is based on a 4-core AMD chip. (This one, which of course isn't made any more: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103727)
I've never had any indication that the CPU is too slow for anything I've tried to do with it. Admittedly I'm not doing 3D rendering or anything like that but I suspect I could if I wanted to. 3.4 ghz is 3.4ghz...
|
Back to top |
|
|
mike Member
Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 6389 | TRs | Pics Location: SJIsl |
|
mike
Member
|
Tue Nov 17, 2015 10:20 pm
|
|
|
Mine is very similar vintage and spec. It is rendering 3D CAD drawings just fine.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Malachai Constant Member
Joined: 13 Jan 2002 Posts: 16088 | TRs | Pics Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny |
IMO AMD CPU's work as well as Intel, they just run a bit hotter. BTW I worked for AMD and own stock in INTL, go figure.
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
|
Back to top |
|
|
Randito Snarky Member
Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9495 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
|
Randito
Snarky Member
|
Wed Nov 18, 2015 5:25 am
|
|
|
Bedivere wrote: | 3.4 ghz is 3.4ghz... |
Well not exactly. A lot of other factors play in to how long it takes to perform a task: How much on chip cache, how optimized the instruction pipeline is and how many clock cycles are required for each instruction.
IME Intel chips get more done at given frequency than AMD, though certainly my usage pattern is not typical.
The clock frequency is a roughly comparable number for most purposes.
|
Back to top |
|
|
jcocci Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2009 Posts: 483 | TRs | Pics Location: Longmont, CO |
|
jcocci
Member
|
Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:41 am
|
|
|
A response to the laptop discussion. I am a Mac guy but have a Surface Pro 3 for some me work stuff and I love it. Definitely recommend one if its fits your budget.
|
Back to top |
|
|
joker seeker
Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 7953 | TRs | Pics Location: state of confusion |
|
joker
seeker
|
Wed Nov 18, 2015 6:38 pm
|
|
|
The CPU discussion is always interesting. Of course there are some other key factors that can have a big impact on performance, depending on what you're actually trying to do - e.g. what sort of GPU you have, how fast the hard drive(s) is(are), followed by some others.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schroder Member
Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 6696 | TRs | Pics Location: on the beach |
|
Schroder
Member
|
Wed Nov 18, 2015 7:05 pm
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|