Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
HitTheTrail Member
Joined: 30 Oct 2007 Posts: 5455 | TRs | Pics Location: 509 |
I got an email from the WTA today that contained a link to their hike finder map. Since I use NWhikers for most of my beta I was curious and spot checked a couple of featured hikes. One that caught my eye was a hike called, “Middle Fork Entiat River” located in Ardenvoir. I grew up in Ardenvoir and have never heard of the Middle Fork Entiat River. When I clicked on it the hike was about the Main Entiat River trail some 25 miles up the road. Also, I saw a hike for Klonaqua Lakes starting down near the 8-mile bridge on the Icicle. That hike actually starts at the Main Icicle TH some five miles up the road. And that was just two hikes that caught my eye. Is there any QC being done on that map?
Please don’t take this as criticism of the WTA. I think they are a great organization and donate quite a bit more than the minimum dues amount. I just think their most visible interface to the public should be accurate.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sore Feet Member
Joined: 16 Dec 2001 Posts: 6307 | TRs | Pics Location: Out There, Somewhere |
No they are definitely not doing any sort of QA on their user submitted data - that would require an immense amount of work (I speak as someone who works in Web QA), not to mention a massive amount of familiarity with the data they're actually attempting to display. Chances are they're just dropping in markers on the coordinates that users submit.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kim Brown Member
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 Posts: 6899 | TRs | Pics
|
It's volunteer-driven. They coordinate with a cadre of volunteers to research, hike, and write up the guidebook entries. Anyone can offer to volunteer. If someone volunteers to submit a "guidebook entry," (different from a trip report), that is what is posted on the website. Unless it's reported to be incorrect, that's what is on the site. If you see something that needs to be corrected, there's a button on the entry that you can use to send the correction suggestion to WTA.
I checked out the Middle Fork Entiat River, and those are trip reports, so there's no coordinated volunteer effort to submit a "guidebook entry."
So long story short, a person from WTA does not actually go to the trail heads with a GPS unit, but rely on volunteers for the guidebook entries; trip reports are not checked for accuracy; the website has a disclaimer about hikers doing further research===
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pyrites Member
Joined: 16 Sep 2014 Posts: 1884 | TRs | Pics Location: South Sound |
|
Pyrites
Member
|
Thu Mar 23, 2017 12:45 pm
|
|
|
I haven't paid attention to trail locations on WTA's maps. But if road access locations are no longer correct, or trail descriptions are out of date, WTA will change them. I've sent careful notes about road access, down to 0.1 of a mile. When I checked back a week or so later they were revised. Similarly a trail was described as sunny and open. Trees grow. They revised it to shaded, with a few view spots in the guide. I'm not sure if you can get direct access to revising the guide. I prefer not to. I like a more consistent "voice" in the writing.
Best.
Keep Calm and Carry On?
Heck No.
Stay Excited and Get Outside!
Keep Calm and Carry On?
Heck No.
Stay Excited and Get Outside!
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chico Member
Joined: 30 Nov 2012 Posts: 2500 | TRs | Pics Location: Lacey |
|
Chico
Member
|
Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:51 pm
|
|
|
Is submitting corrections like Google Maps where you have to convince the reviewer that you know more than they do so they'll accept it?
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kim Brown Member
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 Posts: 6899 | TRs | Pics
|
You can submit any kind of change, as Pyrites illustrates. The proposed changes are researched for accuracy - even if it's just looking at a Green Trails map. So while it might be tempting to give wrong directions to a beloved place, it might work for awhile, but eventually it will be corrected by someone!
Within the WTA office, chances are someone there has hiked X trail. Several WTA staff have been hiking, backpacking, climbing, building trail, fishing, bicycling, etc. in Washington state for decades (well, not continuously, they take breaks). But the hiking content is volunteer-driven, and guidebook entries and corrections submissions are based on reasonable trust and reasonable follow-up research. Which means there's an occasional mistake, or as Pyrites pointed out, changes in the terrain.
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
|
Back to top |
|
|
mbravenboer Member
Joined: 20 Oct 2013 Posts: 1422 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
I've been writing guide entries for the WTA and have tried to maintain my entries a bit with comments I notice.
Unfortunately, not all newly written guide entries are accurate or complete. The previous guide entries from guide books are often better.
I think it would be wise for the WTA to adopt a summitpost model where trails have an owner who takes responsibility for keeping the info accurate. It simply does not scale to have the WTA team themselves do it.
Unfortunately, guide entries do not support comments, so it is challenging to communicate about the guide entry (hard to keep up with trip reports where comments may be sprinkled on the correctness of the entry).
For entries written by volunteers, you can see in the left bar the 'WTA correspondent' who wrote the entry.
Some entries I've done:
I have a big backlog of drafts. Somehow it takes me a day to write these things to be interesting and accurate, so it's hard to get it done.
If you do something that's really wrong and confusing, definitely submit and edit, or send me a PM and then I can try to improve it.
Edit: I do have to say that something seems wrong with the coordinates. For the guide entries I just mentioned, two of them had wrong locations, in an interesting way: Ruby was the winter NW route, and Artist Point was the summer parking area. That's definitely not the location in the entry a while ago.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate NWHikers.net earns from qualifying purchases when you use our link(s).
|