Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
puzzlr Mid Fork Rocks
Joined: 13 Feb 2007 Posts: 7220 | TRs | Pics Location: Stuck in the middle |
|
puzzlr
Mid Fork Rocks
|
Thu Mar 08, 2018 1:38 pm
|
|
|
I don't see this article from the March-April 2018 WTA Magazine on their blog yet so I'll copy it here. I'll add a link if I see it show up.
[Edit] WTA now has a survey up: Want a Simpler Pass System? Take This Survey
The rest of this is verbatim from the magazine.
=========
A Better Way for Recreation Passes?
Outdoor recreation is part of our culture in Washington, fueled by our diverse and breathtaking public lands. In fact, 72 percent of Washingtonians participate in trail-based recreation every year. Those outdoor enthusiasts have more in common than just a love of nature. Most also find the fee system that goes along with trail access — and the more than 20 different passes and permits that are offered in our state — as complicated and confusing as the tax code.
Recreation pass reviewed
Fortunately, legislators have heard this frustration loud and clear, and in 2016, funding was provided in the state budget to analyze the current recreation access fee system and develop recommendations to improve it.
The well-respected William D. Ruckelshaus Center, which specializes in nding solutions for a broad range of public policy issues, was contracted to lead the review process. The center pulled together a mix of stakeholders, from state agencies to the U.S. Forest Service to groups like WTA and Back Country Horsemen of Washington, to review and make recommendations for improving the fee system. In December 2017, the recommendations were published in a report, “Recreation Fees in Washington: Options and Recommendations,” and submitted to the Legislature.
Further analysis proposed
The report highlighted three “big idea” options for a total change in the recreation fee system, focusing on the Discover Pass. The options include
- Developing an alternate funding mechanism that could replace user-based fees (so there would no longer be a Discover Pass)
- Bundling a number of state passes and/or creating a joint pass that would allow hikers on both state and federal lands with just one pass
- Creating a single-vehicle Discover Pass to lower the cost (right now each Discover Pass can be used in two vehicles)
These options need to be explored further to see how they could be enacted and what the financial impacts might be. In his 2018 budget, Gov. Jay Inslee has included $75,000 to conduct a more comprehensive analysis. WTA supports this budget request, and we are advocating for it during the state legislative session. Once this analysis is completed, we hope to see a recommendation for an option that would create a less complex and more equitable recreation access system in Washington state.
|
Back to top |
|
|
cascadeclimber Member
Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Posts: 1427 | TRs | Pics
|
How about we ask Amazon to pay some state taxes and professional athletes to pay for their own workplaces and make non-motorized use of state owned public land free again?
Spending an additional $75,000 to study altering the way in which the general public is fleeced to use land we already own and pay to maintain seems like throwing good money after bad.
Along the way, let's decouple WTA from its dependence on "trail maintenance" revenue from the DNR and oblige the DNR to show that it has existing budget to maintain new infrastructure before it's built.
|
Back to top |
|
|
pcg Member
Joined: 09 Jun 2012 Posts: 334 | TRs | Pics
|
|
pcg
Member
|
Thu Mar 08, 2018 3:52 pm
|
|
|
Thanks for posting the links and giving a summary. I’m assuming you’re inviting discussion so here are my comments…
puzzlr wrote: | The report highlighted three “big idea” options for a total change in the recreation fee system, focusing on the Discover Pass. The options include
… creating a joint pass that would allow hikers on both state and federal lands with just one pass. |
I already have a Senior Pass that allows me free access to federal land. Why should I pay for another pass that does the same, just to get access to WA land. (I’m assuming that a pass for both Fed and WA would be more expensive than one for just WA.)
puzzlr wrote: | ...Creating a single-vehicle Discover Pass to lower the cost (right now each Discover Pass can be used in two vehicles |
Didn't it used to be single-vehicle? I thought that going from a single-vehicle pass to a two-vehicle pass was a response to user complaints.
I was glad when it went to two-vehicle as it allows more flexibity, i.e. we use our low-clearance 2wd high mpg vehicle for most trips, but when snow, etc. requires it we use a 4wd. I'm glad to only have to buy one discover pass for both cars, instead of one for each. Going back to a single-vehicle pass is a backward step as it will cost me more to have to buy two separate passes again.
And.. How does Oregon manage and maintain state land w/o requiring a special pass. Yes, if you enter a state park there is a one-time fee, but for the vast majority of state land (not state parks) access is free. Recreational areas (many include boat launches) are free to use except there is a charge to camp at a developed camp site. Oregon seems to be happy to use proceeds from timber sales on state land to pay for trail and parking area maintenance I suppose. I hope someone that knows more about this than me will add more info.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Malachai Constant Member
Joined: 13 Jan 2002 Posts: 16093 | TRs | Pics Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny |
Don't have a big problem with Discover Pass as it pretty cheap and we live in Issaquah next to several parks and places where it can be used. What I have a problem with is the Snopark Pass which has become way more expensive and limited with most places that do not have the grooming sticker revert to de facto exclusive snow mobile use. I note there is no thought of adding Snopark Pass to the others.
Oh yeah I also have the Geezer Pass
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
|
Back to top |
|
|
Just_Some_Hiker Member
Joined: 02 Jan 2013 Posts: 691 | TRs | Pics Location: Snoqualmie, WA |
Malachai Constant wrote: | What I have a problem with is the Snopark Pass which has go way more expensive and limited with most places that do not have the grooming sticker revert to de facto exclusive snow mobile use. |
Not a fan of sno-park passes, either. Especially since they no longer recognize Washington sno-park passes in Oregon and vice-versa. They're only a worthwhile investment if you're a snowmobiler.
|
Back to top |
|
|
huron Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2004 Posts: 1038 | TRs | Pics
|
|
huron
Member
|
Thu Mar 08, 2018 6:58 pm
|
|
|
cascadeclimber wrote: | Spending an additional $75,000 to study altering the way in which the general public is fleeced to use land we already own and pay to maintain seems like throwing good money after bad.
Along the way, let's decouple WTA from its dependence on "trail maintenance" revenue from the DNR and oblige the DNR to show that it has existing budget to maintain new infrastructure before it's built. |
Agree. For $75K you could hire someone full time to pick up trash and stock restrooms across the state. No WTA free passess either. Too much incentive for them to support restrictions.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pyrites Member
Joined: 16 Sep 2014 Posts: 1884 | TRs | Pics Location: South Sound |
|
Pyrites
Member
|
Thu Mar 08, 2018 7:58 pm
|
|
|
pcg wrote: | ponse to user complaints.
I was glad when it went to two-vehicle as it allows more flexibity, i.e. we use our low-clearance 2wd high mpg vehicle for most trips, but when snow, etc. requires it we use a 4wd. I'm glad to only have to buy one discover pass for both cars, instead of one for each. Going back to a sin |
Exactly. It’s one vehicle at a time. Does the State want me to always take me to take the 4wd? Why?
Keep Calm and Carry On?
Heck No.
Stay Excited and Get Outside!
Keep Calm and Carry On?
Heck No.
Stay Excited and Get Outside!
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kim Brown Member
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 Posts: 6899 | TRs | Pics
|
The single user pass sounds like an option. One pass for one car at a reduced rate but the 2-car pass will still exist...?
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kim Brown Member
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 Posts: 6899 | TRs | Pics
|
All volunteer orgs who work on DNR land can offer a free pass. It's not just WTA volunteers.
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
|
Back to top |
|
|
huron Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2004 Posts: 1038 | TRs | Pics
|
|
huron
Member
|
Thu Mar 08, 2018 8:59 pm
|
|
|
I believe the only reason they want access passes in place is to justify enforcement of passes (Ranger employment plan.) Has anyone done this math?
Total pass revenue - concession fees & marketing & admin - pass enforcement & signage = amount available for trails
My guess is the efficiency of the system is very low.
|
Back to top |
|
|
grannyhiker Member
Joined: 29 Jul 2006 Posts: 3519 | TRs | Pics Location: Gateway to the Columbia Gorge |
pcg wrote: | How does Oregon manage and maintain state land w/o requiring a special pass. |
State lottery funds.
May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view.--E.Abbey
May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view.--E.Abbey
|
Back to top |
|
|
boot up Old Not Bold Hiker
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Posts: 4745 | TRs | Pics Location: Bend Oregon |
|
boot up
Old Not Bold Hiker
|
Thu Mar 08, 2018 9:27 pm
|
|
|
sounds like a load of BS and really just excuses to make it cost MORE.
WA cut of the reciprocation agreement with Oregon.
Oregon passes are cheaper to start with and you don't have to put a car license on it. We can decide if we need to take the high clearance, lower gas mileage SUV, or the high mileage sedan without paying for an extra pass that would cost more than the gas saved. Worst case, is the OR pass encourages carpooling.
Only 2 places in Central Oregon even require the state pass. The good and the bad is that I use both parks very often so its an easy decision. Tumalo state park is 2 miles from my house, and Smith Rock is worth the 40 minute drive during the week. (too crowded on weekends).
Sno park pass is cheaper too, especially since you don't have to buy a groomed trail pass as an add-on, as you do in WA(even if you aren't using the groomed track in places). Of course that is because the only groomed tracks are pay as you go in Oregon, which is actually pretty fair.
No WTA in Oregon. Oddly, this state seems to be making the trails work without a WTA, and keeping prices lower on trail access......hmmmmm.....
WA is getting a bit out of control on the nickel and diming its people. No regrets on leaving for me, but it was an amazing place in the 90's
|
Back to top |
|
|
Riverside Laker Member
Joined: 12 Jan 2004 Posts: 2818 | TRs | Pics
|
I wish we had free gas to get to trailheads.
|
Back to top |
|
|
RumiDude Marmota olympus
Joined: 26 Jul 2009 Posts: 3590 | TRs | Pics Location: Port Angeles |
|
RumiDude
Marmota olympus
|
Fri Mar 09, 2018 1:35 am
|
|
|
puzzlr wrote: | The report highlighted three “big idea” options for a total change in the recreation fee system, focusing on the Discover Pass. The options include
- Developing an alternate funding mechanism that could replace user-based fees (so there would no longer be a Discover Pass)
- Bundling a number of state passes and/or creating a joint pass that would allow hikers on both state and federal lands with just one pass
- Creating a single-vehicle Discover Pass to lower the cost (right now each Discover Pass can be used in two vehicles)
These options need to be explored further to see how they could be enacted and what the financial impacts might be. |
My reading of this may be flawed so correct me if I am wrong, but these seem to be three totally different and independent options. So for instance if they went with the first listed option, there would be no need at all for a Discover Pass: "Developing an alternate funding mechanism that could replace user-based fees (so there would no longer be a Discover Pass)" Of the three options listed there, that seems to be the one that would totally remove the necessity for either of the other two options. As a matter of fact all three seem kinda mutually exclusive.
Well, that's how I am reading this.
Rumi
"This is my Indian summer ... I'm far more dangerous now, because I don't care at all."
"This is my Indian summer ... I'm far more dangerous now, because I don't care at all."
|
Back to top |
|
|
grannyhiker Member
Joined: 29 Jul 2006 Posts: 3519 | TRs | Pics Location: Gateway to the Columbia Gorge |
Quote: | No WTA in Oregon. Oddly, this state seems to be making the trails work without a WTA, and keeping prices lower on trail access......hmmmmm..... |
Trail Keepers of Oregon, which owns the oregonhikers.org forum and Field Guide. Mostly confined to NW Oregon and SW Washington, although they are trying to expand statewide.
May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view.--E.Abbey
May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view.--E.Abbey
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate NWHikers.net earns from qualifying purchases when you use our link(s).
|