Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
carlb328 Member
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 327 | TRs | Pics Location: Yakima, WA |
|
carlb328
Member
|
Sun Sep 16, 2018 8:55 am
|
|
|
So, I am hoping to move back to Washington (again) within the next year or so. I am thinking that if I have the money maybe I will get a small truck like a Ranger for hiking and fishing.
I have an old Mazda 6 now, and it does pretty well on logging roads, but the manual shift cable bracket is a bad design, and bumpy roads can make the shifter cables pop up, which means I can only put it in third gear by pulling on the linkages. That does not make starting or freeway driving feasible.
Anyways, for our steep, rugged, wet, often snowy or muddy back roads would you prefer the front wheel drive of a car, or the higher ground clearance and carrying capacity of a 2WD truck?
Yes 4WD would be better, but I may not be able to afford it.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ski ><((((°>
Joined: 28 May 2005 Posts: 12832 | TRs | Pics Location: tacoma |
|
Ski
><((((°>
|
Sun Sep 16, 2018 9:19 am
|
|
|
I have 319K on a '94 Ranger 2WD 3.0 V6 with a 5-speed and I've never had any issues with the shifter. The transmission has been replaced twice, but the shifter has always worked fine.
Goes anywhere I point it. Hauls anything I can load into it. Last tank of fuel it averaged 18.95 MPG (city/highway).
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
|
Back to top |
|
|
skiorkayak Member
Joined: 09 Feb 2013 Posts: 49 | TRs | Pics
|
+1 on the Ford Ranger. Makes a great hiking/skiing vehicle. You can get a mid 90s 4wd for pretty cheap. I'm on my 3rd and all have gotten over 300k miles. Wether you get 2 or 4wd, make sure it's a 6 cylinder, not a 4.
|
Back to top |
|
|
texasbb Misplaced Texan
Joined: 30 Mar 2009 Posts: 1153 | TRs | Pics Location: Tri-Cities, WA |
|
texasbb
Misplaced Texan
|
Sun Sep 16, 2018 2:37 pm
|
|
|
I agree with Jeff--clearance and toughness. While you can get a weenie FWD sedan or hatchback up many, many forest roads, doing it regularly will wreak havoc on it. Get something that will hold up to the abuse. 4WD is much better the RWD, but with a little weight in the back of a pickup, you can get it to the vast majority of places.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ski ><((((°>
Joined: 28 May 2005 Posts: 12832 | TRs | Pics Location: tacoma |
|
Ski
><((((°>
|
Sun Sep 16, 2018 7:14 pm
|
|
|
^ the "granny low" first gear in that 5-speed Ranger gearbox (actually designed and built by Mazda) has gotten me up and down some pretty sketchy little dirt paths that most people would think passable only with 4WD.
Steer clear of the 2300cc OHC 4 cylinder Ranger engine. It's the old Pinto 2300 with a modified (two spark plug per cylinder) head. I don't care what Ford said about their redesigned head - it's still a Pinto four-banger and it's still a gutless P.O.S. - go with the 3.0L or 4.0L V6. Buddy of mine just picked up a '99 4.0L 2WD auto/trans and loves it - got it for about $3200 because the passenger side was crunched in a bit.
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
|
Back to top |
|
|
treeswarper Alleged Sockpuppet!
Joined: 25 Dec 2006 Posts: 11277 | TRs | Pics Location: Don't move here |
|
treeswarper
Alleged Sockpuppet!
|
Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:07 am
|
|
|
I believe it depends on your driving skills as well and "being one with your vehicle".
I am a mediocre driver and had a hard time keeping up in my 4x4 Silverado, with a logger in a chained up and well weighted down 2 wheel drive crew cab Ford. We were pushing through snow at the time.
I've seen this happen before with other folks driving. A two wheel drive outdoing a 4x4 because of operator skill differences.
I am happy to hear good reports on Ford Rangers. My tomato ranger is approaching 100K and I start to worry about that. I shall be leaving today with my glamping trailer which is pulled with the Tomato.
What's especially fun about sock puppets is that you can make each one unique and individual, so that they each have special characters. And they don't have to be human––animals and aliens are great possibilities
What's especially fun about sock puppets is that you can make each one unique and individual, so that they each have special characters. And they don't have to be human––animals and aliens are great possibilities
|
Back to top |
|
|
joker seeker
Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 7953 | TRs | Pics Location: state of confusion |
|
joker
seeker
|
Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:28 am
|
|
|
I've driven some very rough WA roads in my RWD Ford E250-based camper van. E.g. the road up to Twin Lakes (near Mt Winchester up near the border for instance, when it was in fairly rough shape). I have yet to want to go somewhere in WA that I haven't been able to take this van to. Whereas there are many places in UT and AZ that I'd love to check out where this van will never go (due more to deep soft fine sand than to rough terrain; though there's some of the latter too). Just fwiw.
And we used to have a FWD van with a bit less ground clearance (VW Eurovan) that we got to similar places, including to now-inaccessible-by-vehicle Dutch Miller Gap trailhead, which had a notorious road (on one trip we passed a 4x4 truck that had a broken axle for instance).
|
Back to top |
|
|
mike Member
Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 6398 | TRs | Pics Location: SJIsl |
|
mike
Member
|
Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:46 am
|
|
|
I've had a couple of RWD Rangers and gotta say they get me there and the gutless 4cyl has been reliable and gets as high as 28mpg hwy, avg 23-24mpg. My experience working in the woods on the wet side a 2WD is fine 95+% of the time and is much more economical. Clearance plus a little weight in the back is key. e.g. a 4WD will start plowing in snow same as 2WD and both need chains anyway.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schroder Member
Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 6722 | TRs | Pics Location: on the beach |
|
Schroder
Member
|
Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:53 am
|
|
|
You didn't mention an AWD/4WD SUV as an option. I had a 4x4 F150 for quite a while and I would prefer one of my SUV's over that because of maneuverability. Clearance differences were negligible. The truck was miserable to turn around on a one lane logging road against a wall and a cliff. SUV's are easily had and cheaper than most truck options.
|
Back to top |
|
|
WaState Member
Joined: 27 Sep 2013 Posts: 138 | TRs | Pics
|
|
WaState
Member
|
Wed Oct 10, 2018 5:58 pm
|
|
|
No matter what you get, it is nice to have something that you can lay down and sleep in at the trail head. Gives you the option to drive in the night before.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve Phlogiston Purveyor
Joined: 29 Jan 2002 Posts: 769 | TRs | Pics Location: Bothell |
|
Steve
Phlogiston Purveyor
|
Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:40 pm
|
|
|
Between those two options I'd pick the truck. You can throw some weight in the back to bump up the friction on the drive tires and clearance is important.
Like Joker I used to go on the MFSRR up to the Hardscrabble lake logging road or to DMG TH and back in the 80s and 90s it was killer on low clearance vehicles.
My TH vehicle now is a late 90s 4Runner 4WD. Ones in good condition still command a high price, though.
Despair is only for those who see the end beyond all doubt.
Despair is only for those who see the end beyond all doubt.
|
Back to top |
|
|
BigBrunyon Member
Joined: 19 Mar 2015 Posts: 1458 | TRs | Pics Location: the fitness gyms!! |
if you're talkin' rigs, you're talkin' clearance. some them roads you can't be on if you don't have the clearance needed!!
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chief Joseph Member
Joined: 10 Nov 2007 Posts: 7709 | TRs | Pics Location: Verlot-Priest Lake |
Personally, I like a front wheel drive car with stiff suspension over most rear wheel drive trucks.
Go placidly amid the noise and waste, and remember what comfort there may be in owning a piece thereof.
Go placidly amid the noise and waste, and remember what comfort there may be in owning a piece thereof.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Randito Snarky Member
Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9513 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
|
Randito
Snarky Member
|
Fri Dec 21, 2018 7:32 pm
|
|
|
My kids are currently driving a 2008 vortex V6 GMC Yukon that just clicked over 330,000. Amazing I never thought of GM products being that durable. Fits them, their 3 kids and all crap you need with 3 small kids.
|
Back to top |
|
|
treeswarper Alleged Sockpuppet!
Joined: 25 Dec 2006 Posts: 11277 | TRs | Pics Location: Don't move here |
|
treeswarper
Alleged Sockpuppet!
|
Sun Dec 23, 2018 8:44 am
|
|
|
What it comes down to, for me, is what do you NEED? Do you need to haul stuff? Get a pickup. Do you get stuff delivered easily? Get a car.
What's especially fun about sock puppets is that you can make each one unique and individual, so that they each have special characters. And they don't have to be human––animals and aliens are great possibilities
What's especially fun about sock puppets is that you can make each one unique and individual, so that they each have special characters. And they don't have to be human––animals and aliens are great possibilities
|
Back to top |
|
|
|