Forum Index > Gear Talk > Would you chose FW car or RW truck for NW back roads?
Previous :: Next Topic  
Author Message
carlb328
Member
Member


Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 250 | TRs
Location: Yakima, WA
carlb328
  Top

Member
PostSun Sep 16, 2018 7:55 am 
Reply to topic Reply with quote
So, I am hoping to move back to Washington (again) within the next year or so. I am thinking that if I have the money maybe I will get a small truck like a Ranger for hiking and fishing.

I have an old Mazda 6 now, and it does pretty well on logging roads, but the manual shift cable bracket is a bad design, and bumpy roads can make the shifter cables pop up, which means I can only put it in third gear by pulling on the linkages. That does not make starting or freeway driving feasible.

Anyways, for our steep, rugged, wet, often snowy or muddy back roads would you prefer the front wheel drive of a car, or the higher ground clearance and carrying capacity of a 2WD truck?

Yes 4WD would be better, but I may not be able to afford it.
Back to top
View user's profile Search for posts by this user Send private message Send e-mail Reply to topic Reply with quote
Ski
><((((°>



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 9568 | TRs
Location: tacoma
Ski
  Top

><((((°>
PostSun Sep 16, 2018 8:19 am 
Reply to topic Reply with quote
I have 319K on a '94 Ranger 2WD 3.0 V6 with a 5-speed and I've never had any issues with the shifter. The transmission has been replaced twice, but the shifter has always worked fine.
Goes anywhere I point it. Hauls anything I can load into it. Last tank of fuel it averaged 18.95 MPG (city/highway).

--------------
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach. 
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
Back to top
View user's profile Search for posts by this user Send private message Send e-mail Reply to topic Reply with quote
Jeff
Ramen Elitist



Joined: 18 Aug 2008
Posts: 2769 | TRs
Location: Someone get me out of Everett, WA
Jeff
  Top

Ramen Elitist
PostSun Sep 16, 2018 8:47 am 
Reply to topic Reply with quote
I'd go for ground clearance and durability. There are enough places accessible to a RWD truck to keep you busy for a lifetime. It comes with the increased cost of reduced MPG though. I'd take a car over a truck if gas prices are a concern.

With that said, 4WD is a great thing to have in the snow. You can get by with chains or thrive with a set of snow tires. I've never encountered mud that required 4WD. Truthfully I only like it because I hate getting out to chain up when chains are required except on 4WD.
Back to top
View user's profile Search for posts by this user Send private message Send e-mail Reply to topic Reply with quote
skiorkayak
Member
Member


Joined: 09 Feb 2013
Posts: 41 | TRs

skiorkayak
  Top

Member
PostSun Sep 16, 2018 10:12 am 
Reply to topic Reply with quote
+1 on the Ford Ranger. Makes a great hiking/skiing vehicle. You can get a mid 90s 4wd for pretty cheap. I'm on my 3rd and all have gotten over 300k miles. Wether you get 2 or 4wd, make sure it's a 6 cylinder, not a 4.
Back to top
View user's profile Search for posts by this user Send private message Reply to topic Reply with quote
texasbb
Misplaced Texan



Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 862 | TRs
Location: Tri-Cities, WA
texasbb
  Top

Misplaced Texan
PostSun Sep 16, 2018 1:37 pm 
Reply to topic Reply with quote
I agree with Jeff--clearance and toughness.  While you can get a weenie FWD sedan or hatchback up many, many forest roads, doing it regularly will wreak havoc on it.  Get something that will hold up to the abuse.  4WD is much better the RWD, but with a little weight in the back of a pickup, you can get it to the vast majority of places.
Back to top
View user's profile Search for posts by this user Send private message Reply to topic Reply with quote
Ski
><((((°>



Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 9568 | TRs
Location: tacoma
Ski
  Top

><((((°>
PostSun Sep 16, 2018 6:14 pm 
Reply to topic Reply with quote
^ the "granny low" first gear in that 5-speed Ranger gearbox (actually designed and built by Mazda) has gotten me up and down some pretty sketchy little dirt paths that most people would think passable only with 4WD.

Steer clear of the 2300cc OHC 4 cylinder Ranger engine. It's the old Pinto 2300 with a modified (two spark plug per cylinder) head. I don't care what Ford said about their redesigned head - it's still a Pinto four-banger and it's still a gutless P.O.S. - go with the 3.0L or 4.0L V6. Buddy of mine just picked up a '99 4.0L 2WD auto/trans and loves it - got it for about $3200 because the passenger side was crunched in a bit.

--------------
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach. 
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
Back to top
View user's profile Search for posts by this user Send private message Send e-mail Reply to topic Reply with quote
treeswarper
Alleged Sockpuppet!



Joined: 25 Dec 2006
Posts: 8667 | TRs
Location: Don't move here
treeswarper
  Top

Alleged Sockpuppet!
PostMon Sep 17, 2018 6:07 am 
Reply to topic Reply with quote
I believe it depends on your driving skills as well and "being one with your vehicle". 

I am a mediocre driver and had a hard time keeping up in my 4x4 Silverado, with a logger in a chained up and well weighted down 2 wheel drive crew cab Ford.  We were pushing through snow at the time. 

I've seen this happen before with other folks driving.  A two wheel drive outdoing a 4x4 because of operator skill differences.

I am happy to hear good reports on Ford Rangers.  My tomato ranger is approaching 100K and I start to worry about that.   I shall be leaving today with my glamping trailer which is pulled with the Tomato.

--------------
What's especially fun about sock puppets is that you can make each one unique and individual, so that they each have special characters. And they don't have to be human––animals and aliens are great possibilities
Back to top
View user's profile Search for posts by this user Send private message Reply to topic Reply with quote
joker
seeker



Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 7427 | TRs
Location: state of confusion
joker
  Top

seeker
PostMon Sep 17, 2018 7:28 am 
Reply to topic Reply with quote
I've driven some very rough WA roads in my RWD Ford  E250-based camper van. E.g. the road up to Twin  Lakes (near Mt Winchester up near the  border for instance, when it  was in  fairly rough shape). I have yet to want to go somewhere in  WA that  I haven't been able to  take this van  to. Whereas there are many places in  UT  and  AZ that  I'd  love to check out where this  van will never  go  (due more to deep  soft fine sand than to  rough terrain; though there's some of the  latter too). Just fwiw.

And we used to  have  a FWD van with a bit less ground clearance (VW Eurovan) that we got to similar  places,  including to now-inaccessible-by-vehicle Dutch Miller Gap  trailhead,  which had a notorious road (on  one trip we passed a 4x4 truck that had a broken axle for instance).
Back to top
View user's profile Search for posts by this user Send private message Reply to topic Reply with quote
mike
Member
Member


Joined: 09 Jul 2004
Posts: 6028 | TRs
Location: SJIsl
mike
  Top

Member
PostMon Sep 17, 2018 10:46 am 
Reply to topic Reply with quote
I've had a couple of RWD Rangers and gotta say they get me there and the gutless 4cyl has been reliable and gets as high as 28mpg hwy, avg 23-24mpg. My experience working in the woods on the wet side a 2WD is fine 95+% of the time and is much more economical. Clearance plus a little weight in the back is key. e.g. a 4WD will start plowing in snow same as 2WD and both need chains anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Search for posts by this user Send private message Reply to topic Reply with quote
Schroder
Member
Member


Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 5317 | TRs
Location: on the beach
Schroder
  Top

Member
PostMon Sep 17, 2018 10:53 am 
Reply to topic Reply with quote
You didn't mention an AWD/4WD SUV as an option.  I had a 4x4 F150 for quite a while and I would prefer one of my SUV's over that because of maneuverability.  Clearance differences were negligible. The truck was miserable to turn around on a one lane logging road against a wall and a cliff.  SUV's are easily had and cheaper than most truck options.
Back to top
View user's profile Search for posts by this user Send private message Send e-mail Reply to topic Reply with quote
WaState
Member
Member


Joined: 27 Sep 2013
Posts: 86 | TRs

WaState
  Top

Member
PostWed Oct 10, 2018 4:58 pm 
Reply to topic Reply with quote
No matter what you get,  it is nice to have something that you can lay down and sleep in at the trail head.  Gives you the option to drive in the night before.
Back to top
View user's profile Search for posts by this user Send private message Reply to topic Reply with quote
  Display:     All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Forum Index > Gear Talk > Would you chose FW car or RW truck for NW back roads?
  Happy Birthday LeafEater!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
   Use Disclaimer Powered by phpBB Privacy Policy