Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
Slugman It’s a Slugfest!
Joined: 27 Mar 2003 Posts: 16874 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Slugman
It’s a Slugfest!
|
Mon Jul 01, 2019 12:24 pm
|
|
|
True fact: Japanese people often leave stadiums clean after sporting events, the seating area and bathrooms. Tossing trash on the ground and then leaving it just isn't in their nature.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sky Hiker Member
Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 1469 | TRs | Pics Location: outside |
So we need more Japanese people hiking?
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kim Brown Member
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 Posts: 6899 | TRs | Pics
|
He's responding to my question. But yes, sounds like we do
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
|
Back to top |
|
|
kvpair Member
Joined: 18 Apr 2018 Posts: 119 | TRs | Pics Location: Sammamish |
|
kvpair
Member
|
Mon Jul 01, 2019 5:01 pm
|
|
|
I think that the point being made here is that in some cultures, people would be ashamed to litter since the notion of social duty is strong. America is a country of proud individualists and sometimes individualism and social norms conflict. However, in the absence of enforcement of social norms, we land up in the tragedy of the commons.
I actually am in agreement with the use of social media to shame the more egregious violators - live by Instagram, die by Instagram.
|
Back to top |
|
|
allie Member
Joined: 01 Jul 2014 Posts: 8 | TRs | Pics Location: seattle |
|
allie
Member
|
Mon Jul 01, 2019 9:18 pm
|
|
|
There are PCT hikers and trail runners that are in a hurry and counting grams and can’t be bothered to carry out their own trash. So much toilet paper and poop even 15+ miles from any Trailhead.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sky Hiker Member
Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 1469 | TRs | Pics Location: outside |
I see there's another lost hiker, lots more people out there for sure
|
Back to top |
|
|
rossb Member
Joined: 23 Sep 2002 Posts: 1679 | TRs | Pics
|
|
rossb
Member
|
Tue Jul 02, 2019 8:41 am
|
|
|
I think the big difference is how people find information about hiking. Fifty years ago, if you wanted to go hiking, you talked to someone who had done it before. Maybe you joined them. If you didn't know anyone, you picked up a book. In every book, the intro mentioned being safe and responsible. Stick to the trail, don't pick flowers, etc. Even if they didn't mention "Leave No Trace" specifically, the idea was in there. If you hiked with experienced hikers, they would mention the same thing.
Now people jump to the internet to find information. I don't blame them, I would probably do the same thing. Why spend extra money on books (or extra time at the library) when you can just find all the information online?
The problem is that people are oblivious. I see it all the time. I was up at Mount Townsend, a couple weeks ago, and there were people hiking off to the side, clearly stomping on the fragile plants. Somehow they though they were doing me a favor, even though I had found a small dry patch off to the side. (God forbid we actually come close to each other). While at Green Mountain, I saw a couple doing the same thing, but much worse. I have decided to be a little more brazen in my response. I said very clearly "you are off the trail", hoping they got the message. They probably didn't. Again, I think most people are oblivious.
It doesn't help that we have had a huge increase in people at the same time that the government has less money. There aren't enough of those little "don't walk here" signs. Officials put up a poster with Leave No Trace principles on it, but it gets thrashed within weeks.
I'm not sure if there is an easy answer, except I think the newspaper article helps. Hopefully people link to it, along with other links about being responsible in the wild. It is clear that websites (including social media sites) are how people find hikes these days. Maybe a concerted effort by the hiking websites could help. WTA does link to a "Leave No Trace" web page, but it is buried (and the link doesn't even work). It certainly isn't featured. You can look up hikes, browse hikes and be completely oblivious to the concept. The websites themselves could help, but so too could social media users. Linking to the article helps, as would linking to other articles. I'm sure there are lots of people who are unaware of the damage they are doing -- they don't know that small woody plants (heather, blueberries, etc.) are extremely fragile, and unfortunately, very easy to walk through. Just focusing on that (e. g. "All it takes is one bozo to damage a beautiful meadow", or "Did you know that it takes years for this little plant to grow inches?) would likely be a bit better than simple "Be Nice" messages. I'm sure there are lots of people who think they are leaving no trace (or at least leaving very little) but they are.
|
Back to top |
|
|
rossb Member
Joined: 23 Sep 2002 Posts: 1679 | TRs | Pics
|
|
rossb
Member
|
Tue Jul 02, 2019 8:50 am
|
|
|
Kim Brown wrote: | And one other thing – totally not scientific – someone from Europe told me once that in other countries, littering is just what they do; because an employee of some sort is always there to clean up after them. So when they come here – it’s what they do. Has anyone heard that before? Or was this person full of baloney? |
I don't know about that, but I did notice a difference in hiking in the Alps. There just doesn't seem to be any sort of wilderness ethic. People cut switchbacks all the time. The trails were basically thrashed. Maybe this is because it has been this way for a very long time (the Alps are the Alps in part because they've let sheep and cows graze all over the place). I found it surprising, nonetheless.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ski ><((((°>
Joined: 28 May 2005 Posts: 12832 | TRs | Pics Location: tacoma |
|
Ski
><((((°>
|
Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:06 am
|
|
|
Ross - your observations about going from the Spring-Manning "100 hike" books to finding information online so easily gets to the crux of it: people are skipping over those "forewards" and introductions in which Manning espoused (what was then) a relatively new ethic.
And the "obvliousness" comment is spot on: a lot of people are simply clueless. (Ten minutes on Interstate 5 should be ample evidence of that.)
Again, it goes back to the education thing. There simply isn't money available to pay for the problem to be solved by enforcement:
Sky Hiker wrote: | The reply I got from the King County exec was that the funding set aside for litter patrol and enforcement was used elsewhere in the budget. |
They'll give it lip service, but when push comes to shove, the money's going to go somewhere else - it's not going to pay for "litter patrols" out in the forest.
As to "enforcement": what sort of "enforcement" is actually happening? Did Casey Nocket get tossed in jail, or did she pay a paltry fine and get ordered to perform a few hours or community service? What happened to the brainless kid who set fire to the Columbia Gorge a couple years ago? Jail time, or just a fine and community service?
How much time, effort, and money was blown "enforcing" in those instances? What was gained? How many people were deterred from engaging in similar acts of idiocy?
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cyclopath Faster than light
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 7739 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
Cyclopath
Faster than light
|
Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:27 am
|
|
|
rossb wrote: | I think the big difference is how people find information about hiking. Fifty years ago, if you wanted to go hiking, you talked to someone who had done it before. Maybe you joined them. If you didn't know anyone, you picked up a book. In every book, the intro mentioned being safe and responsible. Stick to the trail, don't pick flowers, etc. Even if they didn't mention "Leave No Trace" specifically, the idea was in there. If you hiked with experienced hikers, they would mention the same thing. |
When I was new here, I bought some 100 Hikes books, but never read any of the forwards.
When I was a kid, they taught us to use common sense and respect when we go out in nature. At the time it was "leave nothing but foot steps, take nothing but pictures." We had a field trip to the woods and a meadow in elementary school.
To be honest, I don't understand how this isn't obvious to everybody.
|
Back to top |
|
|
coldrain108 Thundering Herd
Joined: 05 Aug 2010 Posts: 1858 | TRs | Pics Location: somewhere over the rainbow |
Since I have no expectations of forgiveness, I don't do it in the first place. That loop hole needs to be closed to everyone.
|
Back to top |
|
|
kvpair Member
Joined: 18 Apr 2018 Posts: 119 | TRs | Pics Location: Sammamish |
|
kvpair
Member
|
Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:36 am
|
|
|
Cyclopath wrote: | When I was a kid, they taught us to use common sense and respect when we go out in nature. At the time it was "leave nothing but foot steps, take nothing but pictures." We had a field trip to the woods and a meadow in elementary school.
To be honest, I don't understand how this isn't obvious to everybody. |
I 100% agree. Last week, I was with my 8 year old and we did a short trip to Kamikaze Falls. On the way down, this woman decided that she wanted to cut switchbacks and seemed offended when I explained to her why this was a bad idea. So I decided to take 10 minutes and obliterate the cut with fallen branches and rocks. I hope that my son learns a lesson from this. Parenting and to a perhaps lesser extent, schooling should teach personal responsibility and accountability.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sky Hiker Member
Joined: 03 Feb 2007 Posts: 1469 | TRs | Pics Location: outside |
It's unfortunate that it happens but everyone is in a rush. I myself don't really care for the lack of hikers ethics. Mostly when you yield to other hikers weather it be them coming up hill or giving them room to pass. A thank you or some acknowledgement is nice. I usually give the sarcastic "your welcome" statement. Obviously we have seen a significant drop in trip reports but more lazy trip reports w/o pictures.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cyclopath Faster than light
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 7739 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
Cyclopath
Faster than light
|
Tue Jul 02, 2019 11:02 am
|
|
|
You folks know the story of Julius Caesar. Maybe we need a hiking senate.
|
Back to top |
|
|
joker seeker
Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 7953 | TRs | Pics Location: state of confusion |
|
joker
seeker
|
Tue Jul 02, 2019 12:02 pm
|
|
|
I suspect there's something to the nature of the "on-ramps" to hiking that people used to versus currently go through. I doubt it's the whole story but I think it's nonetheless significant.
I really learned the ropes of hiking and backpacking with a boy scout troop whose leader was quite strong about leaving our camps and rest stops better than we'd found them (i.e. picking up the trash of others not just our own etc.). Some got their start with clubs like the Mounties, the Sierra Club, or the AMC. And yeah in the day of guidebooks lots of us at least read *one* of those prefatory sections in one of our guidebooks, even if we didn't read them all. Now you can spend an evening getting intrigued about hiking thanks to FOMO-inducing social media posts, get an idea of where to go from said posts (all the better to hammer that one spot relentlessly! the selfie opportunities are too compelling to do otherwise...), and stock up on gear that will arrive in boxes at the doorstep tomorrow. Time to hike!
Clubs and guidebook authors long ago learned that it was important for them to invest a decent chunk into education on safety and low-impact practices. Social media largely hasn't evolved to the same point yet.
I've challenged the admins of WH&C on FB to invest more in trying to match these sorts of efforts in their groups, and have volunteered to help if they are interested. So far I instead mostly see periodic fundraisers for one of the local SAR groups and policies banning photos of illegal practices (which are rather silently taken down). Some of the admins still regularly weigh in on threads where concern about overexposing fragile spots is being discussed to dismiss the concerns. Sigh.
I am, nonetheless, an optimist. Just as clubs evolved to have a strong educational component, I think that we're now at the "pine bough bed and bash/bury/burn" stage of evolution in terms of social media use and hiking. I bet that in twenty years, current online norms will be largely seen to be as retrograde as cutting boughs to sleep on or burying cans after burning them in the fire are seen to be now.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate NWHikers.net earns from qualifying purchases when you use our link(s).
|