Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
Tom Admin
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Posts: 17835 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Tom
Admin
|
Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:23 pm
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ski ><((((°>
Joined: 28 May 2005 Posts: 12798 | TRs | Pics Location: tacoma |
|
Ski
><((((°>
|
Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:40 pm
|
|
|
Good grief.
It's possible that both the National Park Service and Washington State Parks will need to clarify exactly where e-bikes are allowed and where they are not.
The public should not be relying on The Seattle Times or any other publication or website for information concerning regulations on public lands.
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Admin
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Posts: 17835 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Tom
Admin
|
Sun Sep 08, 2019 11:44 pm
|
|
|
WA e-bike law says class 1 and 2 e-bikes can ride on shared-use paths unless local jurisdiction restricts them. It also says the local regulation must be consistent along the entire length of a shared-use path that crosses two or more jurisdictional boundaries in order for the local regulation to be enforceable. On designated non-motorized trails with a natural surface they are disallowed by default unless local jurisdiction allows them. So as I interpret things, class 1 and 2 e-bikes are allowed on the John Wayne trail by default (due to non-natural surface) unless WA State Parks specifically disallows them or deems them to be motorized vehicles. Not only that but I think the DNR (who also has jurisdiction) would need to agree.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ski ><((((°>
Joined: 28 May 2005 Posts: 12798 | TRs | Pics Location: tacoma |
|
Ski
><((((°>
|
Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:14 am
|
|
|
^ okay, Tom.... I am already confused....
...sounds to me like some public lands management agencies need to figure out how to communicate the regulations in plain English if they expect to get any sort of compliance.
confusion on part of users = non-compliance.
failure on part of lands management agencies to communicate clearly to users = non-compliance.
this is not rocket science.
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Admin
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Posts: 17835 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Tom
Admin
|
Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:26 am
|
|
|
No, they don't need to communicate anything unless they want to (1) disallow e-bikes on shared paths with a non-natural surface (e.g. paved or gravel) or (2) allow e-bikes on "non-motorized" trails with a natural surface. It's actually pretty simple.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Malachai Constant Member
Joined: 13 Jan 2002 Posts: 16088 | TRs | Pics Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny |
What the heck is a natural surface trail? When I have been on work parties we are always supposed to dig down to mineral soil. The act of making a trail precludes it being a natural surface. When making MTB trails in Canada we paved the route over soft ground with local stone.
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
|
Back to top |
|
|
treeswarper Alleged Sockpuppet!
Joined: 25 Dec 2006 Posts: 11272 | TRs | Pics Location: Don't move here |
|
treeswarper
Alleged Sockpuppet!
|
Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:35 am
|
|
|
Ski wrote: | ^ okay, Tom.... I am already confused....
...sounds to me like some public lands management agencies need to figure out how to communicate the regulations in plain English if they expect to get any sort of compliance.
confusion on part of users = non-compliance.
failure on part of lands management agencies to communicate clearly to users = non-compliance.
this is not rocket science. |
It seems to be.
First of all, we have people who haven't the faintest notion of what an E bike does, or how it rides, or that it really isn't different from a regular bike in that the rider controls how fast, where, and how it operates.
I would be curious to know, 'cept none of the "experts" on this forum would answer, how many have actually ridden an ebike. I would guess that very few have. That is the major problem in ebike legislation. They are new, and well organized already existing lobby groups fear them. Note the bits about invading "my" space.
E bikes have no large lobbying group, yet. People For Bikes supports e bike riding and has done a bit to help legislate, but for the most part, it can be compared to when snowboarders started up on ski hills, except e bikes don't fall off chairlifts and trip up others who are on the chair with them. Which brings up another matter. Isn't having your mountain bike ferried up the hill on a chairlift "cheating"?
Frankly, I just want to ride rails to trails type paths, and two tracks in the woods for my recreational riding. And, I am hoping to build up stamina to ride a regular bike long distance. Regardless on what folks have posted, riding an e bike does help with fitness levels. Guess the naysayers, if at all, have only ridden with the maximum assist or just using a throttle. We who own the bikes know it to be different. My new bike is even harder to pedal up The Steep Hill than my Radmini. That ought to make the "you must suffer and not have fun" crowd happy.
We will be taking our Radminis up to the woods today, along with an unleashed dog. I'm sure the world will inch closer to doomsday because of two old ladies on e bikes and one unleashed dog. Stay away from the Loup Loup area today if you want solitude.
What's especially fun about sock puppets is that you can make each one unique and individual, so that they each have special characters. And they don't have to be human––animals and aliens are great possibilities
What's especially fun about sock puppets is that you can make each one unique and individual, so that they each have special characters. And they don't have to be human––animals and aliens are great possibilities
|
Back to top |
|
|
Joseph Joseph
Joined: 13 Jun 2018 Posts: 258 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
Joseph
Joseph
|
Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:40 am
|
|
|
Tom wrote: | I'm confused. What are you opposed to? Bikes in national parks? Or allowing e-bikes where bikes can go? You don't seem to really know where e-bikes can ride. |
if your question is directed at me (not sure since you didn't quote anything), then my answer is that I think I made it pretty clear that I'm opposed to these e-bikes in national parks. Let me know if you need further clarification.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Joseph Joseph
Joined: 13 Jun 2018 Posts: 258 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
Joseph
Joseph
|
Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:43 am
|
|
|
treeswarper wrote: | We will be taking our Radminis up to the woods today, along with an unleashed dog. I'm sure the world will inch closer to doomsday because of two old ladies on e bikes and one unleashed dog. Stay away from the Loup Loup area today if you want solitude. |
Have at it - I have no idea what the loup loup area is, but if dogs are supposed to be leashed there, then you really ought to leash it.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Admin
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Posts: 17835 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Tom
Admin
|
Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:38 am
|
|
|
Malachai Constant wrote: | What the heck is a natural surface trail? When I have been on work parties we are always supposed to dig down to mineral soil. The act of making a trail precludes it being a natural surface. When making MTB trails in Canada we paved the route over soft ground with local stone. |
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=46.61.710
Quote: | (9) Except as otherwise provided in this section, an individual shall not operate an electric-assisted bicycle or motorized foot scooter on a trail that is specifically designated as nonmotorized and that has a natural surface tread that is made by clearing and grading the native soil with no added surfacing materials. A local authority or agency of this state having jurisdiction over a trail described in this subsection may allow the operation of an electric-assisted bicycle or motorized foot scooter on that trail. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Admin
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Posts: 17835 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Tom
Admin
|
Mon Sep 09, 2019 11:34 am
|
|
|
Joseph wrote: | Tom wrote: | I'm confused. What are you opposed to? Bikes in national parks? Or allowing e-bikes where bikes can go? You don't seem to really know where e-bikes can ride. |
if your question is directed at me (not sure since you didn't quote anything), then my answer is that I think I made it pretty clear that I'm opposed to these e-bikes in national parks. Let me know if you need further clarification. |
You responded to your claim of "lots of places where people can enjoy riding the e-bikes and get out in the wilderness." with "anywhere you can legally ride a regular pedal bike". That didn't make much sense because it isn't legal to ride an e-bike anywhere you can ride a regular pedal bike. The order you seem opposed to gives discretion to allow this. I am confused why you are opposed since you seem to be in favor of allowing people to ride e-bikes where they can legally ride a regular pedal bike. I am guessing you just don't want to see bikes in national parks.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Malachai Constant Member
Joined: 13 Jan 2002 Posts: 16088 | TRs | Pics Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny |
Tom thanks for the information, it still seems kind of vague but I suppose a few trails in more remote areas may fall under that definition. I was wondering specifically about the designated MTB trails on East Tiger and in the Chuckanuts.
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
|
Back to top |
|
|
MultiUser Member
Joined: 16 Feb 2011 Posts: 190 | TRs | Pics Location: United States |
Malachai Constant wrote: | Tom thanks for the information, it still seems kind of vague but I suppose a few trails in more remote areas may fall under that definition. I was wondering specifically about the designated MTB trails on East Tiger and in the Chuckanuts. |
DNR does not allow ebikes on nonmotorized trails.
This is a good summary. https://www.evergreenmtb.org/ebikeaccess# AFAIK it is not updated for the recent change, which will have little impact in WA anyway.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Admin
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Posts: 17835 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Tom
Admin
|
Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:05 pm
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Joseph Joseph
Joined: 13 Jun 2018 Posts: 258 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
Joseph
Joseph
|
Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:17 pm
|
|
|
Tom wrote: | Joseph wrote: | Tom wrote: | I'm confused. What are you opposed to? Bikes in national parks? Or allowing e-bikes where bikes can go? You don't seem to really know where e-bikes can ride. |
if your question is directed at me (not sure since you didn't quote anything), then my answer is that I think I made it pretty clear that I'm opposed to these e-bikes in national parks. Let me know if you need further clarification. |
You responded to your claim of "lots of places where people can enjoy riding the e-bikes and get out in the wilderness." with "anywhere you can legally ride a regular pedal bike". That didn't make much sense because it isn't legal to ride an e-bike anywhere you can ride a regular pedal bike. The order you seem opposed to gives discretion to allow this. I am confused why you are opposed since you seem to be in favor of allowing people to ride e-bikes where they can legally ride a regular pedal bike. I am guessing you just don't want to see bikes in national parks. |
Yes - that's correct. I do not want e-bikes in national parks or in wilderness areas (such as alpine lakes, etc). Other areas are fine and there's other places where people can ride the e-bikes as the poster who posted on the loup loup indicated. So I guess anywhere you can ride the e-bikes other than national parks and wilderness areas. Kind of channeling my inner Harvey Manning.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|