Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
Pahoehoe Member
Joined: 12 Oct 2017 Posts: 563 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Pahoehoe
Member
|
Mon Sep 23, 2019 7:53 pm
|
|
|
olderthanIusedtobe wrote: | I gotta say it. For all of the "blame everything on the millennials" talk...who raised them? Don't they get some of the blame too? Kids don't appear out of nowhere and they don't exist in a vacuum. |
I was joking... although I take no responsibility because I havent raised anyone.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Randito Snarky Member
Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9495 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
|
Randito
Snarky Member
|
Mon Sep 23, 2019 8:06 pm
|
|
|
Pahoehoe wrote: | Are there any other national forest or park areas that you need a permit to day hike into? I don't really see that going over very well. |
Yes, for example Half Dome in Yosemite and Mt Whitney both require day permits. The demand is far beyond the quota, so a lottery is used to allocate the day permits. Mt St Helens is another example of an area where a daily quota is imposed on day hikers.
Looking further , large swaths of wilderness areas in California have quotas and permits. The PNW is more of an outlier in terms of easy access, lack of red tape and uncrowded conditions.
|
Back to top |
|
|
joker seeker
Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 7953 | TRs | Pics Location: state of confusion |
|
joker
seeker
|
Mon Sep 23, 2019 8:40 pm
|
|
|
Yes - you also need permits for day outings at places like Coyote Buttes and Paria Canyon (northern AZ and southern UT border area), the Subway as well as the upper Narrows at Zion, the Fiery Furnace in Arches, etc etc
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pahoehoe Member
Joined: 12 Oct 2017 Posts: 563 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Pahoehoe
Member
|
Mon Sep 23, 2019 8:49 pm
|
|
|
I forgot about Mt. St Helens, but that's a climb. An easier one, but still a climb.
Besides St. Helens, are there reservations? A lottery? First come?
I'm curious how it works.
One thing I dont like about the Enchantments permit lottery is that everyone starts fresh each year. I feel like every year a person enters and doesn't get a permit, their odds should improve.
I don't like the way it's nearly unobtainable although I have been there enough times I'm good, the first time really is amazing...
I still think condensing the people in a few places, especially the masses of day hikers is better than spreading them out...
I wonder how many are vacationing in Leavenworth and want to hike nearby versus people specifically heading to Colchuck for a day hike...
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kim Brown Member
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 Posts: 6900 | TRs | Pics
|
gb wrote: | Well, it happens there are rare plants not far off the trail... |
That's what I was told by the USFS as well, when we were back in there doing trail work.
Also, the heather that was trampled to death in the 60's - 80's still hasn't recovered despite several attempts to revegetate large areas. The growing season is so short. We were shown very large patches of hardpan dirt - not soil - dead dirt - as a result of unregulated, over -use - tent cities. Branches and bark hacked off of larch trees, and whole trees sawn off at the base all for firewood...
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
|
Back to top |
|
|
olderthanIusedtobe Member
Joined: 05 Sep 2011 Posts: 7689 | TRs | Pics Location: Shoreline |
Pahoehoe wrote: | I was joking... although I take no responsibility because I havent raised anyone. |
Didn't mean to single you out. Blame the millennials is a common rallying cry on this board. I also haven't raised anyone so it must not be my fault either.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pahoehoe Member
Joined: 12 Oct 2017 Posts: 563 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Pahoehoe
Member
|
Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:08 pm
|
|
|
Kim Brown wrote: | gb wrote: | Well, it happens there are rare plants not far off the trail... |
That's what I was told by the USFS as well, when we were back in there doing trail work.
Also, the heather that was trampled to death in the 60's - 80's still hasn't recovered despite several attempts to revegetate large areas. The growing season is so short. We were shown very large patches of hardpan dirt - not soil - dead dirt - as a result of unregulated, over -use - tent cities. Branches and bark hacked off of larch trees, and whole trees sawn off at the base all for firewood... |
Still, though, how do we really stop that beyond education? The permit system limits camping... Day hikers doing the whole loop dont really have a lot of time to trample off trail or chop down trees.
And again, this is a small zone in a big area. Most of the Cascades rarely see feet. Would it really be better to spread all those feet out more to trample more plants or condense them where they are?
I get that its unattractive and it takes a long time (if ever) to heal, but there are vast stretches that arent impacted. Its it really a huge conservation issue or an aesthetics issue?
We cant keep everyone (except ourself) out and people are going to people.
|
Back to top |
|
|
gb Member
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 6303 | TRs | Pics
|
|
gb
Member
|
Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:06 am
|
|
|
RandyHiker wrote: | Pahoehoe wrote: | Are there any other national forest or park areas that you need a permit to day hike into? I don't really see that going over very well. |
Yes, for example Half Dome in Yosemite and Mt Whitney both require day permits. The demand is far beyond the quota, so a lottery is used to allocate the day permits. Mt St Helens is another example of an area where a daily quota is imposed on day hikers.
Looking further , large swaths of wilderness areas in California have quotas and permits. The PNW is more of an outlier in terms of easy access, lack of red tape and uncrowded conditions. |
Here is another one: https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/willamette/passes-permits/recreation/?cid=stelprdb5358688
And there has been a lot of noise on crowding and permits in the Three Sisters Wilderness.
|
Back to top |
|
|
gb Member
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 6303 | TRs | Pics
|
|
gb
Member
|
Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:25 am
|
|
|
Pahoehoe wrote: | Kim Brown wrote: | gb wrote: | Well, it happens there are rare plants not far off the trail... |
That's what I was told by the USFS as well, when we were back in there doing trail work.
Also, the heather that was trampled to death in the 60's - 80's still hasn't recovered despite several attempts to revegetate large areas. The growing season is so short. We were shown very large patches of hardpan dirt - not soil - dead dirt - as a result of unregulated, over -use - tent cities. Branches and bark hacked off of larch trees, and whole trees sawn off at the base all for firewood... |
Still, though, how do we really stop that beyond education? The permit system limits camping... Day hikers doing the whole loop dont really have a lot of time to trample off trail or chop down trees.
And again, this is a small zone in a big area. Most of the Cascades rarely see feet. Would it really be better to spread all those feet out more to trample more plants or condense them where they are?
I get that its unattractive and it takes a long time (if ever) to heal, but there are vast stretches that arent impacted. Its it really a huge conservation issue or an aesthetics issue?
We cant keep everyone (except ourself) out and people are going to people. |
Yes, it is a small zone in a big area, but that small zone is also where the rare plants are found. The trail in the upper Enchantments follows a very narrow plateau of which much is vegetated between areas of higher and more barren terrain. For the most part the rocky barren terrain is not that much at risk. There are not a lot of areas like this high plateau in the Cascades, mainly in the Pasayten - and that may or may not have the same rare plants. They haven't been recorded there. As Kim says, with a short growing season and with generally dry summers, these areas are fragile and don't regenerate well at this elevation.
The mid to lower zone is mainly at risk in areas where woody plants like fragile huckleberry and heather can be found.
You are right about one thing for sure, that people will be people - and as such tend to be careless - not intentionally, but careless, nonetheless - they go off walking through heather not thinking about impact.
As to spreading people out, at present that still would work, as there are many, many trails and areas that don't get much use. And in low use areas, the heather and other plants will regenerate, although it takes time. When I travel off trail, to the greatest extent possible I avoid walking in heather, low bush huckleberry, and in wet, mossy areas. I usually walk from stone to stone. How do you educate people to do that? At one time I thought about writing a guide book that would delineate perhaps a dozen cross-country routes and complement that with conversation about how to travel off trail in the mountains with environmental conscientiousness. But I decided such a book would do more harm than good.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pahoehoe Member
Joined: 12 Oct 2017 Posts: 563 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Pahoehoe
Member
|
Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:42 am
|
|
|
Every reasonably traveled area will get social trails.
How many boots does it take to turn a spot to dust? The 1000s in the enchantments are mostly stepping on someone else's preexisting impact.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cyclopath Faster than light
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 7697 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
Cyclopath
Faster than light
|
Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:38 am
|
|
|
gb wrote: | When I travel off trail, to the greatest extent possible I avoid walking in heather, low bush huckleberry, and in wet, mossy areas. I usually walk from stone to stone. How do you educate people to do that? |
Tell everyone how great light trail runners are and how boots have gone the way of the dodo. You should see me tap dance across creeks trying to keep my feet dry.
I don't think you'll be able to convince many people to care about plants. People are taught that human wants and needs come first among the community of life. Some people begrudgingly accept that cute furry animals have a right to exist, but plants are a stretch. Especially heather, you can see that in people's gardens. I'm not saying this attitude is right, I'm saying it's a steep uphill battle.
But boots keep your feet dry in wet mossy areas, and have better grip. My 6 oz Merrells take a while to dry out, and it's easier to walk around.
The reason I felt compelled to hike the Chants is everybody (especially on this forum) speaks like it's the best place in the state, probably in the PNW.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cyclopath Faster than light
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 7697 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
Cyclopath
Faster than light
|
Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:45 am
|
|
|
In any case, I don't think the parking change has deterred very many people from day hiking there. I wouldn't consider a 5 mile road walk acceptable, but a lot of people seem to. It looks like more people are going in through Snow, I guess at least Spring and Manning would be happy about that.
In other news, there are porta potties on Icicle Road at several popular climbing parking areas.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kim Brown Member
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 Posts: 6900 | TRs | Pics
|
Pahoehoe wrote: | I get that its unattractive and it takes a long time (if ever) to heal, but there are vast stretches that arent impacted. Its it really a huge conservation issue or an aesthetics issue? |
Conservation was a big factor in the implementation of the permit system in the first place, so I'd put a yes to that.
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pahoehoe Member
Joined: 12 Oct 2017 Posts: 563 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Pahoehoe
Member
|
Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:07 am
|
|
|
Kim Brown wrote: | Pahoehoe wrote: | I get that its unattractive and it takes a long time (if ever) to heal, but there are vast stretches that arent impacted. Its it really a huge conservation issue or an aesthetics issue? |
Conservation was a big factor in the implementation of the permit system in the first place, so I'd put a yes to that. |
I guess what I was getting at was are there plants that are likely to go extinct or animals being impacted in a way that threatens them to risk their survival?
It doesnt take many people to kill heather.
Is a few areas of heavy impact versus a lot of areas of moderate impact better?
Are the dayhikers/trail runners really causing the impact or is it backpackers?
How many people can they realistically limit it to and will it make a difference?
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kim Brown Member
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 Posts: 6900 | TRs | Pics
|
No clue.
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate NWHikers.net earns from qualifying purchases when you use our link(s).
|