Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
Schroder Member
Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 6696 | TRs | Pics Location: on the beach |
|
Schroder
Member
|
Tue Sep 24, 2019 5:32 pm
|
|
|
Bernardo wrote: | Where in the concrete process does the CO2 get expelled? |
Lime rock has to go through a kiln and it uses typically natural gas as fuel. When you drive by a cement plant the kiln is the long horizontal turning cylinder with a stack at the end where all the emissions originate. Not to mention what is used to do the mining.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Malachai Constant Member
Joined: 13 Jan 2002 Posts: 16088 | TRs | Pics Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny |
In Portland Cement limestone CaCO3 is “burnt” heated to produce CO2 and lime CaO. When the limestone “sets” CO2 is reabsorbed from the air into the lime the only loss is the carbon in the fuel used to burn the lime.
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pyrites Member
Joined: 16 Sep 2014 Posts: 1880 | TRs | Pics Location: South Sound |
|
Pyrites
Member
|
Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:21 pm
|
|
|
CO2 is released as inherent part of process of calcination of limestone. This produces the core active component of concrete.
Lonestar used to have a rotary kiln south of the ports in Seattle. Big pipe looking thing raised above head level, on a slight angle.
Best.
Keep Calm and Carry On?
Heck No.
Stay Excited and Get Outside!
Keep Calm and Carry On?
Heck No.
Stay Excited and Get Outside!
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bernardo Member
Joined: 08 Feb 2010 Posts: 2174 | TRs | Pics Location: out and about in the world |
|
Bernardo
Member
|
Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:35 pm
|
|
|
I knew a few folks here would have some technical knowledge of this.
Would it be very expensive to capture the emissions from the burning fuel? There's probably a lot of room for improvement there. I guess I'm wondering if the comparison with concrete is really based on optimized concrete production?
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sculpin Member
Joined: 23 Apr 2015 Posts: 1376 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Sculpin
Member
|
Wed Sep 25, 2019 7:19 am
|
|
|
Jake Neiffer wrote: | A forests capacity to sequester carbon is optimized if the trees are healthy and at an appropriate stand density. This may require cutting trees to accomplish. |
Healthy sure, but stand density? Carbon is sequestered by sunlight striking leaves. Even in the worst doghair stands, nearly all the sunlight is captured by needles and leaves. Can you back up your assertion about stand density affecting carbon sequestration?
Between every two pines is a doorway to the new world. - John Muir
Between every two pines is a doorway to the new world. - John Muir
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jake Neiffer Member
Joined: 07 Dec 2011 Posts: 825 | TRs | Pics Location: Lexington, OR |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NacMacFeegle Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2014 Posts: 2653 | TRs | Pics Location: United States |
I've got no problem with thinning the unnaturally dense replanted forests of the Pacific Northwest. I also wonder if there have been any studies done looking into how forest diversity affects carbon storage rates and potentials. In a diverse natural forest you get many species filling out the various layers of the forest, while in a commercial, monocultural forest they use herbicides to kill practically everything save for the species of tree they are growing. I would think that the more diverse and healthy the forest the greater the rate/potential for carbon storage would be.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pyrites Member
Joined: 16 Sep 2014 Posts: 1880 | TRs | Pics Location: South Sound |
|
Pyrites
Member
|
Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:34 pm
|
|
|
Stefan wrote: | the building probably is built out of wood because it will cost less. probably has nothing to do with desire for carbon footprint. |
I’ve been following this for maybe five years. Carbon sequestration and renewable resources are flags waved. One London architects even passes out Doug-fit seeds as part of his pitch.
Flexibility of design. Speed of off-site reductions in schedule and labor hours. Foundation methodology the same, except maybe 1/4 as much mass supported, restrained. Much less on site time, after foundation work, again, with much less labor. Time is not just paying interest on money borrowed or revenue lost. It’s also market risk. Condos may be selling like sushi one quarter, stink the next.
I think convergence of motivations, maybe.
Best.
Keep Calm and Carry On?
Heck No.
Stay Excited and Get Outside!
Keep Calm and Carry On?
Heck No.
Stay Excited and Get Outside!
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pyrites Member
Joined: 16 Sep 2014 Posts: 1880 | TRs | Pics Location: South Sound |
|
Pyrites
Member
|
Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:39 pm
|
|
|
For WA & OR States I think motivation is supporting local industry.
One recently opened plant in eastern WA.
https://m.facebook.com/vaagentimbers/
Best.
Keep Calm and Carry On?
Heck No.
Stay Excited and Get Outside!
Keep Calm and Carry On?
Heck No.
Stay Excited and Get Outside!
|
Back to top |
|
|
|