Forum Index > Public Lands Stewardship > Everyone Hates the DNR Timber Plan
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author     Message
AA+
Ski
><((((>



Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 11685 | TRs | Pics
Location: tacoma
Ski
><((((>
PostSat Feb 01, 2020 6:59 pm 
^ sure there is:

institute a state income tax instead of the regressive sales tax upon which the state budget so heavily relies, and disproportionately hits those at the lower end of the socio-economic scale.

but that would be too simple. wink.gif

--------------
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach. 
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
altasnob
Member
Member


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 587 | TRs | Pics
Location: Tacoma
altasnob
Member
PostMon Aug 24, 2020 9:37 am 
On July 16, there was a summary judgment motion in Skagit County Superior Court that if granted, would have dismissed the timber case. The motion to dismiss was brought by the State (the defendants in the case). The judge sided with the plaintiffs (Skagit County, and a bunch of other entities that financially benefit from increased log cutting). So the law suit continues.

I have the pleadings for this hearing if anyone cares about the detailed legal arguments being made on the case (hundreds of pages long).

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Public Lands Stewardship > Everyone Hates the DNR Timber Plan
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
   Use Disclaimer Powered by phpBB Privacy Policy