Forum Index > Public Lands Stewardship > Pro "bikes in the wilderness" story in the Yakima paper
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
kbatku
Questionable hiker



Joined: 17 Sep 2007
Posts: 3330 | TRs | Pics
Location: Yaquima
kbatku
Questionable hiker
PostTue Aug 16, 2011 5:13 pm 
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Go Jo
of the lykkens



Joined: 08 Jun 2003
Posts: 2248 | TRs | Pics
Location: Around The Bend
Go Jo
of the lykkens
PostTue Aug 16, 2011 5:44 pm 
Interesting read and comments, thanks for the link.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Ingunn
Hiking Viking



Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 1751 | TRs | Pics
Location: Redmond
Ingunn
Hiking Viking
PostTue Aug 16, 2011 8:42 pm 
up.gif

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
33teeth
Member
Member


Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 420 | TRs | Pics
33teeth
Member
PostTue Aug 16, 2011 8:53 pm 
up.gif up.gif up.gif

Is that a kind of beer?
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Malachai Constant
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 16092 | TRs | Pics
Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny
Malachai Constant
Member
PostTue Aug 16, 2011 10:05 pm 
Well this is a topic close to my heart. I actively hike AND mountain bike. My opinion is that anywhere horses are allowed bikes should be allowed. That is the position taken by most of the land managers here. Bikes can be incompatible with hikers on some trails such as many in the NW. Where a competent mountain biker descending a steep single track could pose a safety hazard to some hikers. As far as damage to trails I think that is a red herring as a competent biker will not drag the rear. I think horses should also be eliminated on such trails as their damage is more severe than bikers. The problem with implementing such a policy is that it requires thinking and common sense attributes often lacking in bureaucratic minds which demand strict adherence to "bright line" rules.

"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
onemoremile
Member
Member


Joined: 26 Dec 2010
Posts: 1305 | TRs | Pics
Location: Sequim
onemoremile
Member
PostTue Aug 16, 2011 10:35 pm 
Would allowing bicycles open the door for allowing other 'wheeled' items? I know I have a game cart that would enjoy a trip into the wilderness.

“Arbolist? Look up the word. I don’t know, maybe I made it up. Anyway, it’s an arbo-tree-ist, somebody who knows about trees.” G.W. Bush
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
rasbo
Member
Member


Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 373 | TRs | Pics
Location: orting
rasbo
Member
PostWed Aug 17, 2011 5:34 am 
well I see a can of worms here..seems anyplace wheels are let in problems arise...mt bikers jumping rocks riding of the trail,complaining about horses and people on the trail not yielding...Much of the same we see on trails here that allow bikes..And since you going to allow bikes how about the handicapped,should the trails be widened and made accessible for them to ride their cycles in there,,just my thoughts...I cant think of a more unpleasant trip into the wilderness than a guy on a bike yelling passing on the right...then zooming by...

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
John Morrow
Member
Member


Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1526 | TRs | Pics
Location: Roslyn
John Morrow
Member
PostWed Aug 17, 2011 6:53 am 
Malachai Constant wrote:
As far as damage to trails I think that is a red herring as a competent biker will not drag the rear.
This comment I have to politely disagree with. In theory I'd say it is true but 80% of the mountain bikers I see on the trail are out for speed. They have little regard for the switchback, or steep bend that they didn't see ahead of them. I challenge anyone who doubts skidding to hike up the Kachess Ridge trail from Easton north through Silver Creek, a highly popular mountain bike trail. That would be opposite the flow of bike traffic and just observe: you'll see front tires popping out of the trail and folks going around obstructions to reenter the trail. lots of skidding, and little regard for the traffic coming in opposite direction. 20% will behave exemplary. I do believe they belong there and are a valid use of the land, after all I bike too. Mostly I bike on former dirt bike trails behind my home in Roslyn--a place excellent for riding. Just not sure every trail was meant to be taken at 15 miles per hour. Thanks, MC, for letting me comment. John

“Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?”-Mary Oliver “A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual doom.” ― MLK Jr.
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
kbatku
Questionable hiker



Joined: 17 Sep 2007
Posts: 3330 | TRs | Pics
Location: Yaquima
kbatku
Questionable hiker
PostWed Aug 17, 2011 7:36 am 
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
More Cowbell
Warrior Princess



Joined: 01 Jul 2006
Posts: 5657 | TRs | Pics
Location: Alive on Earth
More Cowbell
Warrior Princess
PostWed Aug 17, 2011 7:51 am 
I'm curious, do bicycle clubs ever do trail maintenance to clear the downed trees or fix the nasty ruts in the trail they create? And to add to the list: French Cabin Creek trail is also a death trap for hikers due to speeding Mt. Bikers.

“If you want to forget all your other troubles, wear too tight shoes.” - Unknown
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
kbatku
Questionable hiker



Joined: 17 Sep 2007
Posts: 3330 | TRs | Pics
Location: Yaquima
kbatku
Questionable hiker
PostWed Aug 17, 2011 7:54 am 
people would be a LOT more pissed about horses if they galloped down the trails at 15 mph (btw) smile.gif

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
rasbo
Member
Member


Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 373 | TRs | Pics
Location: orting
rasbo
Member
PostWed Aug 17, 2011 8:02 am 
I have never seen a horse running in the wilderness,or had one get an attitude cause I was on the trail and it had to slow down....But have been on a few bucking in the wilderness..horses are a good way for some folks that cant walk well, or age has affected their abilities.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
wamtngal
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 2382 | TRs | Pics
Location: somewhere
wamtngal
Member
PostWed Aug 17, 2011 8:21 am 
rasbo wrote:
And since you going to allow bikes how about the handicapped,should the trails be widened and made accessible for them to ride their cycles in there
Wheelchairs are allowed in wilderness areas under ADA.

Opinions expressed here are my own.
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Token Civilian
Member
Member


Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 590 | TRs | Pics
Token Civilian
Member
PostWed Aug 17, 2011 8:42 am 
Duthie: Maintained constantly by the MTB club, yet it's muddy and rutty. Bikes don't cause damage? - Duthie falsifies that belief. Malachai - your comment about "competent" is the key. As with any user group, be they hikers, horsemen or bikers, the "competent" ones (as in following LNT practices, shoveling their horse sh*t off the trail, camping in hard sites, washing away from water sources, etc , for example) are sadly too uncommon. I love to hike. I also love me some sweet, sweet single track (Trek 6700 hard tail that handles like a dream on winding, twisting trail...mmmmm, single track). But the last thing I want when I hike is to be run down by a biker tear @$$ing down the trail, alternately silent so I get squashed as they come around a blind corner, or squealing brakes I can hear from a mile away, depending on their maintenance - either way they ruin the experience for other users. The flashing of typically gaudy colors through pristine scenery at unnatural speed also ruins the experience. Nope.....bikes stay on designated bike trails. There's plenty out there outside of Wilderness. If bikes are allowed into Wilderness, it'll destroy it for the vast majority of hikers. Yet another lowering of the bar. And BIKERS aren't prohibited from Wilderness - just their bikes. Bikers (the people) are free to hike or ride a horse back into Wilderness any time. Just leave your bikes at home.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Quark
Niece of Alvy Moore



Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 14152 | TRs | Pics
Quark
Niece of Alvy Moore
PostWed Aug 17, 2011 8:50 am 
Backcountry Bicycle Club does a lot of trailwork (as does 4 wheel clubs and Backcountry Horsemen). The issue is that bicycles are mechanized contraptions, and mechanized widgets are prohibited in Wilderness except for necessary maintenance. To change that, it would require an Act of Congress, and the proposal would likely not get that far due to advocates against it. Nice try, though.

"...Other than that, the post was more or less accurate." Bernardo, NW Hikers' Bureau Chief of Reporting
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Public Lands Stewardship > Pro "bikes in the wilderness" story in the Yakima paper
  Happy Birthday Crazyforthetrail, Exposed!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum