Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
like2thruhike Member
Joined: 28 May 2009 Posts: 1288 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
I like the idea of a Subaru....but what about a Honda or a Toyota?
Less drama.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve Phlogiston Purveyor
Joined: 29 Jan 2002 Posts: 769 | TRs | Pics Location: Bothell |
|
Steve
Phlogiston Purveyor
|
Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:03 pm
|
|
|
You can get a used 4Runner or Tacoma, et al, for a less than a subaru according to my searches. My wife loves her subaru, but I'll likely be replacing my vehicle with a 4Runner partly because the subaru roof racks are too short for me to feel comfortable about mounting my 17'+ kayaks on top and the limited space inside for more than two people.
Despair is only for those who see the end beyond all doubt.
Despair is only for those who see the end beyond all doubt.
|
Back to top |
|
|
iron Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2008 Posts: 6392 | TRs | Pics Location: southeast kootenays |
|
iron
Member
|
Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:31 pm
|
|
|
i found the subaru to be plenty adequate for 4-5 people and 17' kayaks on the roof. but, i hear what you're saying about more options. seems like the 4runner or tacoma is a whole different animal in terms of MPG. our '95 subie was 30 MPG and it's going to be hard to swallow the thought of a drop in MPG.
does anyone have a consumer reports USED card buying guide they'd be willing to lend me? current year or sometime recent? i know they issue these annually. on eBay, they run about $40, which is understandable, but not something i want to pay.
|
Back to top |
|
|
contour5 Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2003 Posts: 2963 | TRs | Pics
|
|
contour5
Member
|
Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:41 pm
|
|
|
I'm kind of partial to 92 to 94 Astro vans; shortie model. Available with AWD, for well under $2k. Mileage isn't the greatest, but there's tons of room for sleeping space. Goes pretty good on snow, with adequate tires. And! You can drop a short block V8 in there if you're lookin to hot rod.
I know this is a bit drifty in the current thread; just wanted to toss it out there for others who might be looking for the perfect trail car...
|
Back to top |
|
|
Navy salad Member
Joined: 09 Sep 2008 Posts: 1865 | TRs | Pics Location: Woodinville |
I've had a 97 Outback that I bought used around 2002 with around 45,000 miles on it at the time. Since then, yes, I've replaced the head gasket--once--but have not had a HG problem since. I've also replaced the CV boots 2 or 3 times, but at least this isn't an expensive repair. I recently had a Suburu Tech (who happens to be a NWHikers' member) replace the clutch just because it was due. It's now got around 200K miles on it +/- and going strong. I've taken it on 80 mile long gravel, potholed roads on Vancouver island several times and all through the Cascades. It's been a great car for both hauling kayaks (as many as four on top, although three is more like it) and many many hiking trips. I intend to drive it until it either falls apart or gets too expensive to maintain.
|
Back to top |
|
|
DIYSteve seeking hygge
Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 12655 | TRs | Pics Location: here now |
|
DIYSteve
seeking hygge
|
Tue Jan 28, 2014 5:48 pm
|
|
|
like2thruhike wrote: | I like the idea of a Subaru....but what about a Honda or a Toyota? |
Subie AWD is superior. Honda makes great cars. Toyota makes very good cars. But both AWD systems kinda suck.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Malachai Constant Member
Joined: 13 Jan 2002 Posts: 16093 | TRs | Pics Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny |
We have 4 runner and a CRV and have many friends who have had subbies what BS says about CRVs is true it is more for going skiing without chains. The 4runner has a very adaptable 4x4 system that includes AWD, compound low, and true 4x4 which is superior to AWD in extreme conditions as does the Tacoma. My friends with Subbies have all had head gasket or tranny problems. I never liked the engines as it is quite inefficient as compared to the others. I also liked preunibody Explorer which we got 200k before contributing it to charity. Just MHO.
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bedivere Why Do Witches Burn?
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 7464 | TRs | Pics Location: The Hermitage |
|
Bedivere
Why Do Witches Burn?
|
Tue Jan 28, 2014 8:18 pm
|
|
|
If trail and cargo capability trump mileage, get the 4Runner.
Other than the gasket issues Subies are, for the most part, quite reliable.
My WRX is being retired from trailhead duty this year in favor of a 4x4 pickup. It doesn't help any that I installed slight lowering springs and stiffer struts on it last summer. Still, it handled the Middle Fork road just fine last weekend.
It's an '06 model that I bought in early '09 for $10K less than what a new one would cost. It had 38K miles so still had the balance of the factory warranty and in all respects was just as nice as a new one.
I've put 100K on it since then and only had very minor issues that could happen with any car though it is now going through oil at higher rate than it used to - about 1 qt every 1500 miles. I think it's the seals in the turbo but can't be sure.
The turbo engines don't have headgasket issues but you do take on the added risk of a turbo failure. They're rare, but they do happen.
A good friend of mine has been a mechanic his whole life and he likes Subies - got one for his wife and it's been mostly trouble free.
|
Back to top |
|
|
boot up Old Not Bold Hiker
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Posts: 4745 | TRs | Pics Location: Bend Oregon |
|
boot up
Old Not Bold Hiker
|
Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:17 pm
|
|
|
gotta say my wife's '12 Impreza is winning me over.
I can't figure out the complaints about the CVT. Nissan's early CVT's were crap and a very different design and are probably responsible for giving CVT a bad name.
I just did 6 hours of driving the Impreza last Saturday, winter gas, much of it in traffic or on streets or gravel/slimey roads or above optimum gas saving speeds on freeway. Below freezing the entire drive in, on winter gas. Still managed an average of about 36mpg per its gauge. To me that is a big deal. Some people obviously don't care about gas mileage, so that wouldn't be a big deal.
Big thing I have noticed in slimey mud or gravel or icey roads, is that the Impreza feels much much more stable than my Honda AWD. Subie knows how to design AWD. And I still have the OEM tires on which everyone says are crap.
Honda's respond well to careful and frequent maintenance. Actually, they require it, in my experience. Also Honda has had some Dark Years. We got out from under a 2000 Accord that was a disaster. So far my Element is doing ok, but all fluids need to be changed every 30k miles, fer instance.
We bought our Impreza Premium model for a smokin good deal. It was a special order to get that simple model with few trinkets. I don't like buying someone else's headache, so I prefer to buy new. I combine getting usually one up from the bottom of the line, and some good bargaining and end up paying what someone else is paying for a car with a bunch of miles on it and a bunch of doodads that are going to break down sooner.
If I had to replace my Honda Element tomorrow for some reason. I would give a close look at the 2014 Forester, cheapest model, which is much better gas mileage than the older ones. And I would get the CVT.
There are already people on the Impreza forum racking up more mileage on the CVT than I will ever put on a car. I have not been hearing of any problems.
Different cars for different needs though.
YMMV
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bogart Member
Joined: 26 May 2009 Posts: 83 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Bogart
Member
|
Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:02 am
|
|
|
iron wrote: | i found the subaru to be plenty adequate for 4-5 people and 17' kayaks on the roof. but, i hear what you're saying about more options. seems like the 4runner or tacoma is a whole different animal in terms of MPG. our '95 subie was 30 MPG and it's going to be hard to swallow the thought of a drop in MPG. |
Iron -
Mileage may be worse on the Outback. I have a '98 Outback, with Hankook iPikes on it year round, plus bike rack & ski racks year round. I'm also running one size up in tire from stock, and replaced the struts/springs so it runs about 2" higher than stock. Main issues affecting mileage would be tires, and then a toss up between the lift & roof hardware. Mostly in city driving I average 21 mpg, road trips I'll get up to about 25.
I drive about 5000 miles annually, so the difference between 20 mpg vs. 25 mpg @ $4 per gallon costs me $200/yr. Your mileage will vary, so to speak...
Big Steve and others have listed decent resources. If you like the Suby stuff, there are a ton of people doing interesting & practical stuff on outback.org. That's a pretty huge knowledge base to fall back on from a DIY and cost management perspective. The headgasket issue is not catastrophic (as long as you commit to monitoring coolant) and a known cost, so limits your exposure.
|
Back to top |
|
|
DIYSteve seeking hygge
Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 12655 | TRs | Pics Location: here now |
|
DIYSteve
seeking hygge
|
Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:35 am
|
|
|
Malachai Constant wrote: | I never liked the engines as it is quite inefficient as compared to the others. |
That changed with the 2012 Impreza 2.0L. EPA 36MPG highway rating, best AWD MPG available. See bootup's post re real time 36MPG. We're getting it on highway trips too, routinely getting 32MPG on ski trips with winter gasoline and a ski pod on top of the car. Pairing with the CVT helps the MPG. And it's a roomy car: back seat leg room is better than older Outbacks.
|
Back to top |
|
|
HitTheTrail Member
Joined: 30 Oct 2007 Posts: 5460 | TRs | Pics Location: 509 |
Bogart wrote: | I have a '98 Outback, with Hankook iPikes on it year round, plus bike rack & ski racks year round. I'm also running one size up in tire from stock... |
I have heard Wildernessed say a couple of times that if one tire has a problem you have to replace all four of them. I think it is related to a balancing issue with the AWD. I know it happened to him at least once and maybe twice. Just something to consider.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Randito Snarky Member
Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9513 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
|
Randito
Snarky Member
|
Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:16 am
|
|
|
BigSteve wrote: | like2thruhike wrote: | I like the idea of a Subaru....but what about a Honda or a Toyota? |
Subie AWD is superior. Honda makes great cars. Toyota makes very good cars. But both AWD systems kinda suck. |
I had a 1998 AWD Honda CRV -- I put 184,000 miles on it. Other than oil/filter changes it needed the following repairs over the fourteen years I drove it:
o Replace radiator
o Replace clutch
o Replace brake pads.
o Replace timing belt and water pump.
o Replace clutch again (not it's fault, I fried the clutch towing a dead camper van a short distance d'oh)
I found the AWD on the 1998 to work well enough for getting to and from the ski area and in and out of the parking lot without chains.
When I purchased the 1998 I compaired it to the RAV4, Subaru wagon and forester. One thing I recall was that the CRV had more ground clearance than either Subaru -- and I find ground clearance to be a more important factor for driving unmaintained logging to trailheads than AWD.
Anyway -- my general reccommendation is to test drive the CRV, RAV4, Ford Escape as well as the Subaru -- and be sure to sit in the back seat of each. This was an important factor in me not choosing a 1998 Forrester -- as it's back seat felt like I was sitting on a thinnly padded pipe. In the 1998 RAV4 the back seat was suitible only for munkins. If you plan on carpooling with friends to the trail head, back seat comfort is a consideration.
I'm now driving a 2013 AWD CRV -- the AWD system is superior to the that of the 1998 CRV -- but I can't say how it compares to the current Subaru offerings.
|
Back to top |
|
|
DIYSteve seeking hygge
Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 12655 | TRs | Pics Location: here now |
|
DIYSteve
seeking hygge
|
Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:40 am
|
|
|
Agree re superior reliability of Hondas. CRV is a great car, but the AWD is way behind Subie. Also agree that Honda and Toyota fit and finish kick ass on Subie. I've had cars with Subaru, Honda and Toyota AWD and IME the latter two suck in icy and loose dirt conditions. (As Mal notes, locked up traditional transfer case 4WD is another animal.)
Here are two of many videos out there demonstrating the the superiority of Subie AWD vs. Honda, Toyota, Ford/Mazda, Chevy, Nissan:
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve Phlogiston Purveyor
Joined: 29 Jan 2002 Posts: 769 | TRs | Pics Location: Bothell |
|
Steve
Phlogiston Purveyor
|
Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:51 am
|
|
|
HitTheTrail wrote: | I have heard Wildernessed say a couple of times that if one tire has a problem you have to replace all four of them. I think it is related to a balancing issue with the AWD. I know it happened to him at least once and maybe twice. Just something to consider. |
This is correct. According to Subaru all tires must be within 1/32" diameter to each other to avoid damaging the AWD system, so rotating your tires at the proscribed intervals is important.
Despair is only for those who see the end beyond all doubt.
Despair is only for those who see the end beyond all doubt.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|