Forum Index > Photography Talk > Milky Way shots - how to?
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
gb
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 6310 | TRs | Pics
gb
Member
PostWed Apr 09, 2014 7:47 pm 
So, I just bought a digital camera and I would like to take a few Milky Way shots. I would imagine you can't meter Milky Way shots with a modern digital camera - no? I know that with my old film camera and ISO 50 film I could get good star shots at F3.5 to F4 for whatever length of time. So what settings do you use for ISO, aperture and what minimum shutter speed will allow for a Milky Way shot?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Seventy2002
Member
Member


Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 512 | TRs | Pics
Seventy2002
Member
PostWed Apr 09, 2014 10:39 pm 
No personal experience, but this looks like what you want. http://www.davemorrowphotography.com/p/tutorial-shooting-night-sky.html

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
DaveMorrowPhoto
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Posts: 4 | TRs | Pics
DaveMorrowPhoto
Member
PostThu Apr 10, 2014 3:44 pm 
Seventy2002 thanks for sharing my link smile.gif Gb, that tutorial will walk you through everything from start to finish. Luckly we have dark skies out here in the PACNW, I'm just waiting for some clear ones in the near future:) Have fun! Dave

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
509
Member
Member


Joined: 03 Oct 2007
Posts: 998 | TRs | Pics
Location: 509
509
Member
PostFri Apr 11, 2014 8:43 am 
DaveMorrowPhoto wrote:
Luckly we have dark skies out here in the PACNW, I'm just waiting for some clear ones in the near future:)
Stick the camera on a tripod and shoot for the longest exposure time probably will be 30 seconds. Set the ISO range at highest and then move down until you get black skies. There are some really cheap mounts you can build to do wide-field astrophotography. Do a search on "barn door mounts" and "astrophotography". Cheap is definited as $15. Skies in Washington are horrible due to light pollution. There is NO PLACE in the state where you cannot see a light dome. The Cascades are particularly a basket case due to Puget Sound light pollution. AND the city of Seattle is going to put in BRIGHTER street lights because LED's are so cheap to run!! The good news some of the darkest skies in the US are just south of us in eastern Oregon. The Steens and the desert east are really the place to for dark skies. They even beat the southwest these days due to all the growth in Arizona.

Retired Forester....rambling round www.usbackroads.blogspot.com
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Cyclopath
Faster than light



Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Posts: 7744 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Cyclopath
Faster than light
PostFri Apr 11, 2014 10:46 am 
509 is right about the light domes. Try to use them to your advantage, and go far out. Harts Pass is as good a spot as any around here. The "rule of 600" says that if you're using a 24 mm lens you have about 25 seconds before the stars begin to trail. I keep my exposures to 20 seconds. Aperture and ASA will depend on the brightness in the sky and on your exposure time, which depends on what lens you're using. This was from a Canon 5D v3 and 24 mm f/1.4 L v2. I'm guessing because I don't have the details handy, but this was 20 seconds and probably f/2 and probably ASA 6400 or 12800, possibly 25600.
The light over the horizon is from Seattle and Vancouver. This was pretty close to midnight because I wanted a dark sky. Pity about the jet. But it prints beautifully!

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
joker
seeker



Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 7953 | TRs | Pics
Location: state of confusion
joker
seeker
PostFri Apr 11, 2014 2:14 pm 
A few aids for finding dark sky: http://darksky.org/component/content/article?id=91 http://www.jshine.net/astronomy/dark_sky/ And for finding moon phases (so you can plan ahead for no or low moon nights): http://stardate.org/nightsky/moon There are also various aids (including of course smartphone apps) to help predict the position of the Milky Way in the sky for given nights/times. (probably all in the tutorial linked to above, but in case not...)

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
DaveMorrowPhoto
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Posts: 4 | TRs | Pics
DaveMorrowPhoto
Member
PostFri Apr 11, 2014 8:09 pm 
509 wrote:
Skies in Washington are horrible due to light pollution. There is NO PLACE in the state where you cannot see a light dome. The Cascades are particularly a basket case due to Puget Sound light pollution. AND the city of Seattle is going to put in BRIGHTER street lights because LED's are so cheap to run!!
really? The wilderness in the North Cascades and the Olympic Peninsula are both pitch black ( without a moon in the sky ). Alvord Desert they say is the darkest, but there is some light from little farm houses here and there. I still think the Olympic Penn is the darkest once you really get out there... Even at Ruby Beach ( attached photo I took there last summer ). There isn't any visible light pollution.
None the less, you can still get some great photos with light pollution, just so long as it's not to much:)

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
509
Member
Member


Joined: 03 Oct 2007
Posts: 998 | TRs | Pics
Location: 509
509
Member
PostSat Apr 12, 2014 11:51 am 
DaveMorrowPhoto wrote:
really? The wilderness in the North Cascades and the Olympic Peninsula are both pitch black ( without a moon in the sky ).
REALLY....The people that are NOT into astronomy have a different definition of "pitch black". I did have a GIS map produced that showed the United States and those areas without ANY light domes visible. I will try and find it and post here. Here is the scale used by most amateur astronomers for gauging sky darkness without a meter: Bortle Scale The central Cascades are a four or five on the scale. I'll have to ask a friend about the Olympics, when he lived on the coast he would go up to Hurricane Ridge. I have seen Bortle 1 skies only a few times in my life. Last time was up on the Beaverhead National Forest in Montana. Once you see those skies it just lives in your memory forever.

Retired Forester....rambling round www.usbackroads.blogspot.com
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
mike
Member
Member


Joined: 09 Jul 2004
Posts: 6398 | TRs | Pics
Location: SJIsl
mike
Member
PostSat Apr 12, 2014 12:10 pm 
509 wrote:
Hurricane Ridge.
Victoria is a torch. Vancouver is pretty prominent around here.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
gb
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 6310 | TRs | Pics
gb
Member
PostSun Apr 13, 2014 9:01 am 
Thanks, again for the replies. I hadn't recalled the amount of time that it takes for the stars to begin to show streaks. I'm heading to Utah, so there should be ample opportunity to shoot dark skies. The nighttime skies are not as bright as they used to be down there now with the coal fired power plants near Page and the Garkane power plant. I remember some nights twenty years ago that would absolutely blow your socks off.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Ringangleclaw
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 1559 | TRs | Pics
Ringangleclaw
Member
PostMon Apr 14, 2014 6:04 pm 
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Malachai Constant
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 16093 | TRs | Pics
Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny
Malachai Constant
Member
PostMon Apr 14, 2014 6:22 pm 
Great night shots in North Korea, but I don't want to go there. wink.gif

"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
509
Member
Member


Joined: 03 Oct 2007
Posts: 998 | TRs | Pics
Location: 509
509
Member
PostTue Apr 15, 2014 2:20 pm 
Malachai Constant wrote:
Great night shots in North Korea, but I don't want to go there. wink.gif
The sad part is that we can have both dark skies and a modern lifestyle. If you think about it a DARK SKY is the ONLY part of the natural environment that can be made accessible to everyone....no matter where they live. You can't say that about parks, national forests, or BLM lands. Cost is not only minimal, but in most cases it is profitable to save energy and the night sky.

Retired Forester....rambling round www.usbackroads.blogspot.com
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
bobbi
stillaGUAMish



Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 8012 | TRs | Pics
Location: olympics!
bobbi
stillaGUAMish
PostWed Apr 16, 2014 8:54 pm 
lol.gif paranoid.gif shakehead.gif agree.gif embarassedlaugh.gif
for Kim Brown
for Kim Brown

bobbi ૐ "Today is your day! Your mountain is waiting. So…get on your way!" - Oh, the Places You’ll Go! By Dr. Seuss
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
509
Member
Member


Joined: 03 Oct 2007
Posts: 998 | TRs | Pics
Location: 509
509
Member
PostThu Apr 17, 2014 12:41 pm 
That's probably the ONLY Milky Way most urban people have ever seen!!! During the big earthquake in LA during the 80's the power was out for several days over a large area. People called the local government and wanted to know "why did the government change the sky after the earthquake"? No information if they liked the city sky or the "real" sky better.

Retired Forester....rambling round www.usbackroads.blogspot.com
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Photography Talk > Milky Way shots - how to?
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum