Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
Allison Feckless Swooner
Joined: 17 Dec 2001 Posts: 12287 | TRs | Pics Location: putting on my Nikes before the comet comes |
|
Allison
Feckless Swooner
|
Tue Mar 08, 2005 2:18 pm
|
|
|
I think we might be better off taking the discussion of this away from the thread about the guy who fell to his death recently.
What, if anything, should land managers do to protect us from being hurt in the backcountry?
Discuss.
www.allisonoutside.com
follow me on Twitter! @AllisonLWoods
www.allisonoutside.com
follow me on Twitter! @AllisonLWoods
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mount Logan Canada's Highest
Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 870 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle, WA |
I think that one of the compelling characteristics of the entire American experiment is the ideal of personal freedom. When government agencies over-regulate our activities, it flies in the face of some of the reasons for our nation's existence. Land managers should do just that, manage & protect the land--rather than babysit the public.
On the other side of the coin, it is vital for a healthy society to have safeguards in place that protect people from the consequences of other people's malicious or stupid actions; I think that laws and regulations should legitimately exist for this reason.
I guess what I'm saying is this: I should have the freedom to head out into the great outdoors and decide for myself how much risk I am willing to subject myself to, but I should be constrained from taking actions which unreasonably jeopardize the safety and well-being of others.
Rules that protect people from each other are necessary (don't drink and drive); rules that protect people from themselves are intrusive and an insult to our intelligence (don't drive without a seatbelt).
|
Back to top |
|
|
#19 Member
Joined: 17 Dec 2001 Posts: 2197 | TRs | Pics
|
|
#19
Member
|
Tue Mar 08, 2005 9:48 pm
|
|
|
Logan Jenott wrote: | I think that one of the compelling characteristics of the entire American experiment is the ideal for individualism and personal freedom. When government agencies over-regulate our activities, it flies in the face of some of the reasons for our nation's existence. Land managers should do just that, manage & protect the land--rather than babysit the public. |
I'll take a stab at a non-political response to your politically loaded statement. Removing a hand line from McClellands Butte is not baby sitting the public. Putting hand lines and nailing ladders up every peak would be babysitting the public. But that isn't happening, is it?
Quote: | I guess what I'm saying is this: I should have the freedom to head out into the great outdoors and decide for myself how much risk I am willing to subject myself to |
I know of nothing that keeps any of us from jeopradizing our own personal safety in the backcountry.
Quote: | Rules that protect people from each other are necessary (don't drink and drive); rules that protect people from themselves are intrusive and an insult to our intelligence (don't drive without a seatbelt) |
Another politically charged statement. If you believe mandatory seatbelt laws have no value to society , then I believe I should have the right to drink and drive. As long as I don't hurt anyone it should be OK. It is all about personal responsibility, right?
|
Back to top |
|
|
touron Member
Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Posts: 10293 | TRs | Pics Location: Plymouth Rock |
|
touron
Member
|
Tue Mar 08, 2005 9:52 pm
|
|
|
I wonder if anyone has ever been hurt falling off the haystack?
Touron is a nougat of Arabic origin made with almonds and honey or sugar, without which it would just not be Christmas in Spain.
Touron is a nougat of Arabic origin made with almonds and honey or sugar, without which it would just not be Christmas in Spain.
|
Back to top |
|
|
loofus carpet bagger
Joined: 27 Feb 2005 Posts: 80 | TRs | Pics Location: Tom Waits' Refrigerator |
|
loofus
carpet bagger
|
Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:07 am
|
|
|
marylou wrote: | What, if anything, should land managers do to protect us from being hurt in the backcountry?
Discuss. |
I could go way too deep on this, but I'll keep my answer simple and say "nothing." It isn't their job. They should protect the land, not the people using it. There are exceptions, of course, but they are highly circumstantial. My only gripe is the ever-increasing lack of trail/bridge maintenance coupled with the fees we pay for this stupid NW Forest Pass. It's getting so bad down here in Oregon that it makes more sense to just hike x-country than to try to find all the overgrown trails that usually don't lead anywhere interesting. It sure seems like the only trails that are ever maintained are the ones leading to "high use" problem areas. Go figure...Pretty soon the Forest Circus will ban offtrail travel and force us to stick to maintained routes, all but eliminating any kind of wilderness experience.
I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was going to blame you.
I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was going to blame you.
|
Back to top |
|
|
dicey custom title
Joined: 11 May 2004 Posts: 2870 | TRs | Pics Location: giving cornices a wider berth |
|
dicey
custom title
|
Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:17 am
|
|
|
touron wrote: | I wonder if anyone has ever been hurt falling off the haystack? |
Yes. People have been killed falling off the haystack.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Backpacker Joe Blind Hiker
Joined: 16 Dec 2001 Posts: 23956 | TRs | Pics Location: Cle Elum |
Nothing.
It's to open ended a question. To say that they should do anything means that they should do everything in their power to prevent whatever is possible of happening.
Nothing.
TB
"If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide."
— Abraham Lincoln
"If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide."
— Abraham Lincoln
|
Back to top |
|
|
Allison Feckless Swooner
Joined: 17 Dec 2001 Posts: 12287 | TRs | Pics Location: putting on my Nikes before the comet comes |
|
Allison
Feckless Swooner
|
Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:39 am
|
|
|
If you think the question is too broad, I have no objections with you reframing it. Go for it.
www.allisonoutside.com
follow me on Twitter! @AllisonLWoods
www.allisonoutside.com
follow me on Twitter! @AllisonLWoods
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chief Paulina Member
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 486 | TRs | Pics Location: Ochoco country |
Hi. We are from the government and are here to help you.
"Life's been good to me so far" - Joe Walsh
"Life's been good to me so far" - Joe Walsh
|
Back to top |
|
|
Malachai Constant Member
Joined: 13 Jan 2002 Posts: 16092 | TRs | Pics Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny |
What is a bit of a problem is a well traveled and maintained trail leading to a somewhat hazardous scramble. Perhaps a warning/memorial plaque would be appropriate like the one you see on the coast. I agree that a cable would probably create more problems than it would solve such things can become electrified in storms.
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
|
Back to top |
|
|
Allison Feckless Swooner
Joined: 17 Dec 2001 Posts: 12287 | TRs | Pics Location: putting on my Nikes before the comet comes |
|
Allison
Feckless Swooner
|
Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:13 pm
|
|
|
Personally, I don't want to see interference with the natual hazards. Let them be.
The exception to that might be footbridges, but as much to combat erosion as to get across the creek.
www.allisonoutside.com
follow me on Twitter! @AllisonLWoods
www.allisonoutside.com
follow me on Twitter! @AllisonLWoods
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stefan Member
Joined: 17 Dec 2001 Posts: 5091 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Stefan
Member
|
Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:26 pm
|
|
|
Land managers should do nothing.
If they did something, then it would cost money.
If it costs money then your trail park pass annual expense will increase.
People make mistakes. People die from mistakes. It sucks but that is reality.
|
Back to top |
|
|
kleet meat tornado
Joined: 06 Feb 2002 Posts: 5303 | TRs | Pics Location: O no they dih ent |
|
kleet
meat tornado
|
Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:32 pm
|
|
|
marylou wrote: | Personally, I don't want to see interference with the natual hazards. Let them be. |
Do you classify Mt. St. Helens as a natural hazard? They've got the whole dealy-o closed off "for your protection".
A fuxk, why do I not give one?
A fuxk, why do I not give one?
|
Back to top |
|
|
Allison Feckless Swooner
Joined: 17 Dec 2001 Posts: 12287 | TRs | Pics Location: putting on my Nikes before the comet comes |
|
Allison
Feckless Swooner
|
Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:37 pm
|
|
|
That's kind of an extreme example, and no, I'm okay with that being closed. Same with burn areas.
www.allisonoutside.com
follow me on Twitter! @AllisonLWoods
www.allisonoutside.com
follow me on Twitter! @AllisonLWoods
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jamin Smitchger Member
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Posts: 673 | TRs | Pics Location: Pullman |
I believe that government should do little if anything (besides placing warning signs) to protect us in the backcountry. For one thing, there is limitless potential to die out there if you are not prepared. Secondly, the vast majority of trails are completely safe and are generally not hazardous to the average person. Thirdly, a person who goes offtrail should be completely able to take care of himself in any normal situation. Fourthly, there will always be dumb people who push themselves beyond their limits and end up recieving a Darwin Award. This will occur even when safeguards are in place. For instance, a person who climbs over the rail at Wallace Falls and ends up "falling".
|
Back to top |
|
|
|