Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
kiliki Member
Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 2310 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
kiliki
Member
|
Mon Oct 10, 2005 5:30 pm
|
|
|
Quote: | I really wish that a NW historian with credentials would weigh in here. Maybe a Prof. at the UW. |
*cough, cough, stammer*
I'm probably the closest thing you've got-I work in public history though I don't get my "credentials" until I finish that dissertation-but trust me, that's the last thing you want in this forum. There's usually a pretty big disconnect between the kind of works academics are putting out and the kind of stuff history buffs are interested in.
|
Back to top |
|
|
salish Member
Joined: 17 Dec 2001 Posts: 2322 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
salish
Member
|
Mon Oct 10, 2005 5:56 pm
|
|
|
My short-term memory is not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my short-term memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiliki Member
Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 2310 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
kiliki
Member
|
Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:02 pm
|
|
|
Salish, what is the name of the book?
That reminds me, and just to put some actual academic knowledge to use, the only book I've heard repeatedly recommended about the L&C expedition is James Ronda's Lewis and Clark Among the Indians. I haven't read it myself, though.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Snowshoe Hare Defunct lagomorph
Joined: 03 Dec 2004 Posts: 1185 | TRs | Pics
|
Salish, that's interesting thanks for sharing the info. Of course there's many different opinions about L&C, many different perspectives. It's just another chapter in the messy and marvelous human story. I thought that particular quote from Axtell was funny and telling in a low-key way. I like the way some other Native American leaders or tribal members have come out and tried to be accommodating to those that are celebrating Lewis and Clark's Corp of Discovery, acknowledging what it meant to many of us on many different levels but at the same time using it to teach and educate us about how the Indians fit into the grand scheme.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Malachai Constant Member
Joined: 13 Jan 2002 Posts: 16088 | TRs | Pics Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny |
It is fun to read their actual journals also
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blue Dome Now with Retsyn
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 3144 | TRs | Pics Location: Cleaning up the dogma. |
|
Blue Dome
Now with Retsyn
|
Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:33 pm
|
|
|
Snowbrushy wrote: | In pre-history - who know's the first nwhiker? I don't. Maybe Kennewick Man? Maybe. |
Yeah, there is evidence that suggests an interesting take on the ancestry of the “first Americans.”
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/09/0903_030903_bajaskull.html
Quote: | Who Were The First Americans?
Stefan Lovgren
for National Geographic News
September 3, 2003
A study of skulls excavated from the tip of Baja California in Mexico suggests that the first Americans may not have been the ancestors of today's Amerindians, but another people who came from Southeast Asia and the southern Pacific area.
The question of who colonized the Americas, and when, has long been hotly debated. Traditionally, Native Americans are believed to have descended from northeast Asia, arriving over a land bridge between Siberia and Alaska some 12,000 years ago and then migrating across North and South America.
But recent research, including the Baja California study, indicates that the initial settlement of the continent was instead driven by Southeast Asians who occupied Australia 60,000 years ago and then expanded into the Americas about 13,500 years ago, prior to Mongoloid people arriving from northeast Asia.
"Our results change the traditional idea that all modern Amerindians present morphological affinities with East Asians as a result of a single migration," said Rolando González-José of the University of Barcelona, Spain, who led the study. "The settlement of the New World is better explained by considering a continuous influx of people from Asia."… |
This in no way reduces the plight of the American Indians or the grave injustices they’ve suffered. That the ancestry of the “first Americans” may be more diverse than first thought is just a mile marker on the way to the truth.
In any case, Lewis and Clark's brave journey was over land that had been, of course, well traveled for thousands of years.
“I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell.”
— Harry S. Truman
“I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell.”
— Harry S. Truman
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sawyer Member
|
|
Sawyer
Member
|
Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:44 pm
|
|
|
Here's how it was in '21, before the Mountaineers limited trips to 12 people. This one's on their Glacier Peak expedition in August of that year:
|
Back to top |
|
|
Snowbrushy Member
Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 6670 | TRs | Pics Location: South Sound |
Those are some great pic's! Thank's.
Oh Pilot of the storm who leaves no trace Like thoughts inside a dream Heed the path that led me to that place Yellow desert stream.
Oh Pilot of the storm who leaves no trace Like thoughts inside a dream Heed the path that led me to that place Yellow desert stream.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate NWHikers.net earns from qualifying purchases when you use our link(s).
|