Forum Index > Public Lands Stewardship > St. Helens concessions
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
greg
Member
Member


Joined: 23 Jun 2003
Posts: 1159 | TRs | Pics
greg
Member
PostSat Oct 15, 2005 8:53 am 
Not sure I'm liking the sound of this. Concession Opportunities Offered at the Mount St. Helens National Volcanic Monument VANCOUVER, WA ––Concessionaires are being sought by the Gifford Pinchot National Forest to provide a broad range of visitor services at sites located throughout the Mount St. Helens National Volcanic Monument. Opportunities are being offered in four areas: Sites along State Route 504 including Johnston Ridge Observatory, Coldwater Ridge Visitor Center; sites along Forest Roads 99, 26, and 25 such as the Cascade Peaks Concession site, Windy Ridge Interpretive site, Bear Meadow area; sites along Forest Roads 83 and 81 including Ape Cave, Marble Mountain Sno-Park; and the Pine Creek Work Center compound. Services offered include restaurant operation, retail gift sales, educational book sales, mobile food and sundries vending, recreational equipment rentals, outfitter guide services, theater operation, development and operation of concessionaire-owned and operated rustic lodging facilities, and conversion of the Pine Creek Work Center facility to public recreational uses such as an organizational camp or RV campground. A complete description of potential opportunities is found in A Prospectus for the Delivery of Visitor Services, Mount St. Helens National Volcanic Monument, which is available for download at http://www.fs.fed.us/gpnf/purchasing/solicitations/proposals.shtml or by contacting Steve Nelson at the Forest Headquarters in Vancouver at (360) 891-5175 or by e-mail at smnelson@fs.fed.us. The term of the permit will be five years, with longer terms possible depending on the nature of the proposed service and level of investment. A pre-application informational meeting for prospective applicants is scheduled for 10 a.m. on Thursday November 3, 2005 at the Gifford Pinchot National Forest Headquarters, 10600 NW 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA. The purpose of the meeting is to answer questions about the prospectus and the facilities and opportunities included in the Volcanic Monument recreation complexes. The deadline for receipt of applications is 4 p.m. on Friday January 27, 2006. * * *

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Alan Bauer
Member
Member


Joined: 11 Jan 2002
Posts: 942 | TRs | Pics
Location: Fall City, Washington
Alan Bauer
Member
PostSun Oct 16, 2005 7:34 pm 
greg--blah, I'm not fond of that idea either the more I stewed over it for a day. It's bad enough that Cougar, WA exists and has nothing to offer but Coke and corn-nuts at a gas station, but why dump places up in the heart of that south side of the mountain? Or those north side visitor centers? I certainly don't feel people need something along FS 25 to help them get from point A to B..... Keep it remote and keep the tow truck drivers busy with a good job

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Eric
Peak Geek



Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 2062 | TRs | Pics
Location: In Travel Status
Eric
Peak Geek
PostSun Oct 16, 2005 7:52 pm 
Whatever happened with the scheme to connect 504 to the East side FS roads that the locals were pushing?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
greg
Member
Member


Joined: 23 Jun 2003
Posts: 1159 | TRs | Pics
greg
Member
PostSun Oct 16, 2005 8:07 pm 
There's another thread here titled "Forest Service selling our heritage." That's what this feels like to me. On the one hand, the Forest Service won't let hikers go to some special places in the blast zone, such as St. Helens and Spirit lakes and much of the blast zone -- for research purposes now 25 years later -- and on the other hand they're trying to turn frontcountry areas into volcano Disneyland. As for pushing the road through, I think it's a pipe dream of local lawmakers that is dead in the water since it faces mega opposition and doesn't stand a chance of getting funded.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Alan Bauer
Member
Member


Joined: 11 Jan 2002
Posts: 942 | TRs | Pics
Location: Fall City, Washington
Alan Bauer
Member
PostSun Oct 16, 2005 9:15 pm 
Exactly how I feel too, greg....this summer I had the wonderful pleasure as I stood both at the southern terminus and northern terminus of the Truman Trail...and you can't believe how dumb I felt standing there looking at pink/yellow little pieces of tape "closing off" the trail to protect me from all of the terrible things that could happen to me. Of course, both times I saw VAN LOADS of WSU research students, none over age 22, waltzing in to this dangerous territory. I guess I could have too if I just hiked with a rant.gif hard hat? Sigh... Oh, and both times I watched helecopters land 2-3 times in there as well. But at least the FS can feel happy about people being able to have heated toilets instead of world class outhouses, and they can end their suffering from having to settle for Gas Station Blend coffee on the route to the mountain area. I can sleep better knowing that, by golly--no more Shell Station Blend in Packwood on the way south!!

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
mgd
Member



Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 3143 | TRs | Pics
Location: Full Moon Saloon
mgd
Member
PostSun Oct 16, 2005 10:28 pm 
Maybe nwhikers should bid on the contract. hmmm.gif

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
lookout bob
WTA proponent.....



Joined: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 3045 | TRs | Pics
Location: wta work while in between lookouts
lookout bob
WTA proponent.....
PostMon Oct 17, 2005 10:36 am 
this IS another fine example of the FS selling our heritage.....they certainly could not afford to do anything of the sort themselves...no $ for investment.......so farm it out to some concessionaire who can sell cheesy ornaments of St Helens glass and brickabrac and geegaws to car tourists......greasy cheeseburgers for $8 ( fries extra....) and whatever else they can pawn off on car tourists ( or is it tourons....?????) I HATE the idea......why can't we just leave it as it is? Sounds like I need to get on the scoping list for Mt St Helens National Monument...... rant.gif rant.gif

"Altitude is its own reward" John Jerome ( from "On Mountains")
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Don
Member
Member


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 2013 | TRs | Pics
Location: Fairwood, WA
Don
Member
PostFri Oct 21, 2005 8:37 pm 
Quote:
why can't we just leave it as it is?
Because there is tourism money to be had. Mount Rainier, North Cascades and Olympic all have them, whether it is the NWIA or Guest Services, Inc. or others. The fact is that a lot of tourists come to see Mount St. Helens and currently there is a lot of lost revenue on behalf of the national monument. I'm not siding, just answering the question. Mount St. Helens is just getting too popular for us to expect it to stay primitive. Besides, you always have the option to keep driving...

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Public Lands Stewardship > St. Helens concessions
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum