Forum Index > Trail Talk > Car break in thread
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
napali2004
Member
Member


Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 82 | TRs | Pics
napali2004
Member
PostThu Oct 12, 2006 8:09 am 
I think it's a good idea and something I would want to be aware of. Since I will more than likely always have my kid with me, I would avoid areas with a lot of break ins. Last week a couple in Oregon was attacked by a guy breaking into cars at the trailhead. http://salem-news.com/articles/october062006/couple_hurt_10606.php

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Traildoggie
Member
Member


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 158 | TRs | Pics
Location: Near Arlington
Traildoggie
Member
PostFri Oct 13, 2006 4:18 pm 
I like this idea and think it's informative not negative. we were vandalized at the end of august this year at the Monogram Lake trailhead. gas line cut, took > 1 week and $800 to fix. there was a note on the trail register describing a similar incident previously but we chose (unwisely, as it turns out) to go anyway. We've witnessed vandalized cars on Mt Loop outside Granite so many times we won't overnight anywhere on that road. We were vandalized near the Marten Lake trailhead near south Baker about 4 years ago, and a long time ago at the white chuck trailhead. So, we've paid our dues. Nothing is 100% safe but if thieves are targeting certain areas I would go elsewhere. As it is now you could park somewhere that is being heavily hit by vandals and have absolutely no way of knowing unless it's so bad it actually makes the newspaper.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Traildoggie
Member
Member


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 158 | TRs | Pics
Location: Near Arlington
Traildoggie
Member
PostFri Oct 13, 2006 4:23 pm 
S'cuse me...meant to say I would vote to put this as a sticky under Trail talk. Won't be useful if new threads keep getting started cause not everyone knows to look for it.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Ulrich
Member
Member


Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Posts: 174 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Ulrich
Member
PostFri Oct 13, 2006 4:49 pm 
From all the anecdotal evidence it appears that most car break-ins and related vandalisms take place on weekends (?), on cars left unattended from Friday to Monday mornings. As stated before we've seen broken glass on numerous trailheads on Monday mornings. Being retired we have the luxury to hike during the week. Most of the time our car was the only one at very remote and also very popular trailheads. Luckily we never experienced any break-ins so far.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Tim and Angel
Angel now an Angel



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 376 | TRs | Pics
Location: Pugetopolis
Tim and Angel
Angel now an Angel
PostSun Oct 15, 2006 7:46 pm 
I feel very lucky this has not happened to me yet. There has got to be some way, some device that can frighten thieves or vandals away....I am talking about something other than sitting on a tail gate holding a shotgun loaded with rock salt anticipating unsavory types. A motion detection activated "punch to the face" air bag? up.gif A glass break detector that automatically sounds an alarm from another area (wireless) Like a remote loudspeaker siren portable hidden a few yards away. Tear gas or mace mist that is activated by opening a glove box. ...I guess the damage would have been done to the first vehicle, but the perpetrators may leave the rest of the lot alone. Anyway, I am all for this thread.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Allison
Feckless Swooner



Joined: 17 Dec 2001
Posts: 12287 | TRs | Pics
Location: putting on my Nikes before the comet comes
Allison
Feckless Swooner
PostSun Oct 15, 2006 7:54 pm 
Hm, so it seems we're largely in agreement about this idea in theory. The devil, it appears, is in the details. Where to put it? Some say TRs, some say TT. Personally, it see it better fitting in TRs as it's essentially a subset of TRs, but would hate to see it not happen based on a small detail. I do not see the thread as either negative or positive, merely informational. Any of you who read my posts may know that I'm low drama on the crime related threads, on the rare occasion I post on them. Sticky or no sticky? Personally, I prefer the sticky so that there are not multiple threads. I'd love to see ONE thread strictly on TH incidents. Just the facts, and nothing about preventative or countermeasures, if you catch my drift. The advantage to sticky is that everyone knows about the thread, the disadvantage, for those of you who browse the subforums one at a time (I use the magnifying glass upper left corner to only see new posts) is visual clutter.

www.allisonoutside.com follow me on Twitter! @AllisonLWoods
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Tim and Angel
Angel now an Angel



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 376 | TRs | Pics
Location: Pugetopolis
Tim and Angel
Angel now an Angel
PostSun Oct 15, 2006 8:16 pm 
Yeah, I agree, ML. TR and sticky. Trail head, date, and maybe a brief description of the crime. (vandalized, gas line, busted window, theft) Just the facts. This would be great and I bet it would be viewed every time a new post surfaced.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Dayhike Mike
Bad MFKer



Joined: 02 Mar 2003
Posts: 10958 | TRs | Pics
Location: Going to Tukwila
Dayhike Mike
Bad MFKer
PostSun Oct 15, 2006 8:40 pm 
My vote is still for Trail Talk. And no sticky. It's actually counterproductive to have it as a sticky as people will simply get used to having it on top and ignore it. If you're concerned about additional threads, mods can merge errant posts in with the main thread if necessary. Hopefully, there will be relatively few break-ins and this won't be necessary too often. Even if it does require intervention now and again, people will eventually remember it's there, and get used to searching for it and posting in it.

"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." -P.J. O'Rourke "Ignorance is natural. Stupidity takes commitment." -Solomon Short
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
GeoHiker
Rocky Walker



Joined: 26 Feb 2005
Posts: 6033 | TRs | Pics
Location: Off the Deep End
GeoHiker
Rocky Walker
PostTue Oct 17, 2006 2:26 pm 
I think it's a great idea and should be stickied somewhere. I tend to agree with DHM that I ignore the stickied threads, but then if it's important I'll know right where to find it without hunting it down. This post was fresh on my mind Wed. morning when I took off early for the TOL campout and ended up camping at Walupt Lake. Creepy guy in a van was parked all alone right at the TH 200 ft. from where I was camping. Since I was the only one camping in that HUGE campground it was a bit disconcerting. It cut about 3 hrs out of my hiking day before I finally decided to chance it and hike. Needless to say I had to rush and wasn't in the best frame of mind the rest of the day thinking the guy would come back. I wish something could be done, but other than posting a lookout with a rifle the scums are going to keep doing this kind of theft. I've only had my rig broken into once. Last summer in Vancouver Canada and was lucky enough to only lose some clothes and sunglasses. My car was towed and it took 4 hrs to find it and pay the $85 towing fee. Add on the $150 for the window and I got off easy. I could have easily lost all my camping and hiking gear. I camp all the time in remote areas and tend to avoid the popular TH's if possible. I camped a lot in the Mtn Loop area last year and never had a problem, but know that area is hit hard. I guess it's not a matter of if , but a matter of when.

You call some place paradise, kiss it goodbye......Eagles
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
1k
Member
Member


Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Posts: 606 | TRs | Pics
Location: Ballard
1k
Member
PostWed Oct 18, 2006 7:00 pm 
GeoHiker wrote:
I guess it's not a matter of if , but a matter of when.
I don't believe it is inevitable to get vandalized, but the more you hike, the more likely something will happen. The longer a car is left unattended, the more vulnerable it is. I think the point of a break-in thread would be to lower the odds that you arrive back at the TH and find a window broken. If there are reports of increased activity at certain places, why not choose somewhere else to go? The trick, and benefit of a break-in thread, is to know where the bad guys have recently been. Up to date info like that would be useful to making informed decisions.

Life is short, hike hard...
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Nancy
Member
Member


Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 110 | TRs | Pics
Location: Edmonds
Nancy
Member
PostThu Oct 19, 2006 2:24 pm 
On Monday October 2 we returned to our car at 3:23 at the Mt. Dickerman trail head and found it vandalized. The Jeep next to us had its rear window bashed in and the SUV to the left was untouched. We figured that belonged to the hikers we met that got a late start. It looked like the vandals first tried to punch in the lock in the front passenger door and failed. So they just punched in the side of the car next to the lock, and ransacked the car. The only thing they got was an old pair of prescription sunglasses with a very heavy prescription. Our car is now in the shop and the damage is $1000 which we will pay as our deductible is $1000. We returned to this trail head exactly one week later on Columbus Day, hiked to the top, and returned to an unvandalized parking lot. Some said we were foolish to do this, but we felt that if you fall off a horse you just have to get back up there and ride on.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Dayhike Mike
Bad MFKer



Joined: 02 Mar 2003
Posts: 10958 | TRs | Pics
Location: Going to Tukwila
Dayhike Mike
Bad MFKer
PostThu Oct 19, 2006 2:28 pm 
Sorry to hear about it Nancy... frown.gif
Nancy wrote:
The only thing they got was an old pair of prescription sunglasses with a very heavy prescription.
Which they apparently needed, since they couldn't tell you'd left nothing of value in your car from 3-4 feet away while looking through the window. Hopefully their corrected eyesight will prevent them from needless destruction in the future and enable them to pick out the fools who leave laptops, wallets, and treasury bonds behind for easy collection by the thieves.

"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." -P.J. O'Rourke "Ignorance is natural. Stupidity takes commitment." -Solomon Short
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Dayhike Mike
Bad MFKer



Joined: 02 Mar 2003
Posts: 10958 | TRs | Pics
Location: Going to Tukwila
Dayhike Mike
Bad MFKer
PostThu Oct 19, 2006 2:30 pm 
GeoHiker wrote:
I've only had my rig broken into once. Last summer in Vancouver Canada and was lucky enough to only lose some clothes and sunglasses. My car was towed and it took 4 hrs to find it and pay the $85 towing fee. Add on the $150 for the window and I got off easy. I could have easily lost all my camping and hiking gear.
Wow. Further proof that towing companies *ARE* the equivalent of highway robbery. hockeygrin.gif

"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." -P.J. O'Rourke "Ignorance is natural. Stupidity takes commitment." -Solomon Short
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Traildoggie
Member
Member


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 158 | TRs | Pics
Location: Near Arlington
Traildoggie
Member
PostThu Oct 19, 2006 2:39 pm 
Sorry to hear about the Dickerman trail head. Maybe everyone knows this but I'll say it anyway. Vandalism is covered under the "comprehensive"portion of your insurance and is not treated like a car accident. the deductible is different and more likely $100. Depending on the damage you can decide if you want to claim anything or pay it yourself out of pocket. we recently hit a deer and that also was covered under comprehensive.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
GeoHiker
Rocky Walker



Joined: 26 Feb 2005
Posts: 6033 | TRs | Pics
Location: Off the Deep End
GeoHiker
Rocky Walker
PostThu Oct 19, 2006 3:24 pm 
Dayhike Mike wrote:
GeoHiker wrote:
I've only had my rig broken into once. Last summer in Vancouver Canada and was lucky enough to only lose some clothes and sunglasses. My car was towed and it took 4 hrs to find it and pay the $85 towing fee. Add on the $150 for the window and I got off easy. I could have easily lost all my camping and hiking gear.
Wow. Further proof that towing companies *ARE* the equivalent of highway robbery. hockeygrin.gif
Tack on the 3 hrs that I was stuck at the border going through a "random clearance check" to get back into the USA, it was not a good day. down.gif It's alarming to read about so many breakins. I'd be interested to see some statistics from the Forest Service if this is a growing trend or cyclic in nature. Good friend of mine worked for the FS out of Skykomish 20 some years ago and there was a huge problem all up and down the US 2 corridor. They finally had to bring in outside help with the FBI and busted 2 guys.

You call some place paradise, kiss it goodbye......Eagles
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Trail Talk > Car break in thread
  Happy Birthday treasureblue, CascadeSportsCarClub, PYB78, nut lady!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum