Forum Index > Trail Talk > North Cascades Biggest/Steepest - the numbers
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
Killer
Member
Member


Joined: 16 May 2003
Posts: 51 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Killer
Member
PostMon Jun 02, 2003 6:07 pm 
I have emerged from my winter cave with the results of much research, and possibly this site's longest post. For anyone interested... I thought it would be interesting to measure some of my favorite mountains in WA to see which ones were biggest/steepest from top to bottom. Instead of looking at the elevation of a peak, which does not tell you how tall a mountain is, only how high above sea level it is, I measured summit to immediate valley -- vertical relief. A tall mountain may not be impressive if it isn't steep, so I measured steepness, too. I borrowed a formula devised by Edward Earl from the Yahoo Prominence group to come up with values that factor both height and steepness. He calls it "Cliff Measure" or CM = (rise^2)/(rise+run). To make the numbers more intuitive: A 1,000 ft flagpole gets a CM of 1,000. A 1,000 ft hill with a 45-degree slope gets a score of 500. Basically take the vertical relief of the peak and subtract from that number based on the steepness (or lack of steepness) of the slope. It's difficult to figure out the maximum CM for a peak without writing a program to do it, so I made an educated guess. Usually that meant measuring from the summit down the mountain until the terrain starts to flatten out in the valley below. However, David Metzler, a mathematician, mountain afficionado and all-around good guy, did figure out some maximum CMs for comparison to some of the planet's best: Peak Max CM --------------------------------------- Rainier 3320 feet Davis Pk (N Cascades) 2717 Half Dome 2714 El Capitan 2431 Whitney 1936 Logan 6043 Denali 6027 Annapurna Fang 7792 Gurja Himal 7769 -------------------------------------------------------------- Here are some of my calculations, best read with a fixed-width font ---Cascades--- Peak Vertical Relief (ft) Distance (mi) Aspect CM Davis Pk * 5,623 1.19 ne 2655.6 Castle Rock 7,100 2.30 east 2619.5 Rainier ** 11,400 7.50 nw 2548.2 McGregor 6,700 2.10 south 2523.6 Tricouni 6,082 1.64 east 2509.3 Goode 6,000 1.60 ne 2491.7 Despair 5,763 1.47 east 2455.7 Agnes 5,771 1.48 north 2451.5 Elephant Butte 5,220 1.14 north 2424.4 Rainier 12,000 9.00 sw 2419.4 Eldorado 6,386 2.00 west 2406.5 Jack 7,450 3.00 west 2383.1 HiddenLakeLO 5,830 1.60 sw 2380.5 Blum 6,750 2.35 north 2378.2 Hozomeen 5,040 1.09 north 2353.0 Big Devil 6,635 2.30 north 2344.3 Colonial 6,500 2.20 ne 2332.2 Luna 5,100 1.15 north 2328.1 Johannesburg 5,450 1.40 north 2312.9 Flora 7,300 3.00 east 2302.9 Primus 6,500 2.25 north 2298.7 Ruby 6,200 2.00 west 2293.6 Snowking ne ridge 4,514 0.85 ne 2263.5 Snowfield subpk 6,137 2.00 south 2255.7 Davis Pk 6,100 2.00 south 2233.5 Whitehorse 6,100 2.00 north 2233.5 Primus 6,535 2.40 east 2223.5 Pt 6872 (l beaver crk) 4,522 0.89 north 2217.6 Sloan Pk 5,540 1.60 se 2194.1 Forbidden 6,100 2.10 south 2164.9 Big Four 4,200 0.75 north 2161.8 Crater 6,250 2.24 south 2160.9 Triumph 5,000 1.25 north 2155.2 Pugh 6,194 2.20 west 2154.2 Eldorado 7,000 3.00 west 2145.4 Terror 7,000 3.00 south 2145.4 Baring 3,675 0.50 north 2138.7 Pyramid Mtn *** 7,145 3.20 east 2123.5 Booker 5,660 1.80 south 2112.6 White Chuck 5,801 1.92 south 2111.5 Three Fingers 4,000 0.70 east 2079.0 Jack 6,665 2.80 north 2071.1 Luna 5,815 2.00 south 2065.0 Johannesburg 6,800 3.00 west 2042.4 Pioneer RidgeW 4,245 0.88 west 2026.7 Shuksan 4,590 1.10 north 2026.2 1660m 4,350 0.95 south 2020.3 Formidable 5,969 2.29 west 2020.0 Dome 6,000 2.25 south 2013.4 Garfield 4,000 0.75 south 2010.1 Index 3,231 0.38 west 1993.2 Baring 3,138 0.35 north 1974.9 Shuksan 8,260 5.00 se 1968.5 Booker 4,019 0.83 ne 1922.6 Hozomeen 6,450 2.90 west 1911.7 Baring 5,265 1.75 sw 1911.1 Glacier Pk 7,034 3.60 west 1900.0 Church 5,150 1.70 south 1877.6 Baker 10,150 8.50 se 1872.1 Goode 5,300 1.85 sw 1864.2 Snowfield 7,100 3.80 east 1855.8 Blum 7,180 4.00 west 1821.6 Garfield 4,460 1.25 south 1798.5 Logan 7,000 3.85 nw 1793.0 Shuksan 4,770 1.50 ne 1793.0 Triumph 6,300 3.00 east 1792.7 Pioneer Ridge 4,100 1.00 north 1792.1 Challenger 5,000 1.70 east 1788.8 Buckner 6,000 2.70 south 1777.3 Shuksan **** 8,431 6.00 south 1772.1 Index 3,220 0.50 north 1769.4 * Davis Peak near Newhalem, believed to be the only place in the lower 48 that drops over one vertical mile within one horizontal mile. Max CM is 2,717 according to David Metzler. You can see the upper NE face from the Diablo Lake overlook. ** Metzler calculated Rainier's max CM to be 3,320, by far the best in the lower 48 - Point Success to Kautz Creek: 9,022 feet in 2.89 miles. *** This measures to the edge of Lake Chelan. Interestingly, the lake's deepest point is near this peak, which makes 8,631 ft of vertical, the deepest gorge in North America. To the middle of the lake it is 3.75 miles, for a CM roughly of 2620, just guessing. **** Probably the greatest vertical relief for a non-volcanic peak in WA. The CM isn't very high because this measures over the relatively flat and expansive Sulphide Glacier. This measures to the surface of dam-made Baker Lake. Here are a few other major peaks in the lower 48. Again, not necessarily max CM: ---Olympics--- Vertical Distance Aspect CM Constance 6,823 3.04 south 2035.19 Carrie 5,645 2.45 sw 1714.98 Tom 5,624 2.50 sw 1680.78 Anderson 4,315 1.36 east 1619.65 Brothers 3,726 1.00 se 1541.54 Olympus 7,000 5.43 nw 1373.69 Olympus 5,503 3.70 se 1209.43 ---Sierras--- I used the book "The High Sierra: Peaks, Passes and Trails" to identify the major peaks in the range. The biggest peaks in the Sierras are the fault block escarpments like San Jacinto and the eastern wall of the high sierra. These peaks get significant extra vertical from abutting large valleys that drop slowly. I measured both to the edge of the valley and to the deepest points in the valleys. The huge steep walls of Yosemite also make high CMs, with Half Dome the highest in CA at CM=2714 according to Metzler. CM Peak Vertical Distance Aspect 2649.9 San Jacinto 8,867 3.94 north 2286.5 El Cap 3,134 0.22 south (the nose) 2246.8 San Jacinto 10,175 6.80 east 2241.3 Lone Pine 6,985 2.80 east (to edge of valley) 2234.0 Williamson 8,383 4.37 east (to edge of valley) 2035.9 El Cap 3,550 0.50 south 2003.5 Telescope 10,024 7.60 west (to edge of valley) 1799.6 Whitney * 7,919 5.10 east (to edge of valley) 1732.0 Telescope 9,049 7.24 east (to edge of valley) 1698.0 Telescope 11,256 12.00 east 1642.1 Morrison 4,635 1.60 north 1491.4 Whitney 10,695 12.50 east 1295.1 Humphreys 7,000 5.84 east 1218.2 Mt Sill 4,585 2.40 east 1204.8 Whitney 2,000 0.25 east face 1150.0 Ritter 3,885 1.75 east 1117.0 Matterhorn Pk 5,200 3.60 north 1102.2 Black Kaweah 4,405 2.50 south 1060.4 N Palisade 4,000 2.10 north 990.6 Winchell 5,056 3.93 west 638.4 Darwin 4,005 4.00 ne 472.2 Darwin 2,981 3.00 west * Whitney Max CM is 1936 ---Rockies--- Obviously not comprehensive, I don't have software for this region, maybe someone with topo software and a lot of time on their hands can fill out this list. Peak Vertical Distance Aspect CM MT Kinnerly* 5,550 1.13 north 2680.8 WY Grand Teton 6,910 3.00 east 2098.8 Squaretop 3,595 0.72 north 1747.2 CO Sopris W 6,307 2.62 west 1975.0 N Maroon 3,814 0.87 east 1730.2 Maroon 3,756 0.89 east 1668.5 Sneffels 4,550 1.43 nw 1710.8 Longs 2,455 0.48 ne 1207.9 to chasm lake Longs 5,950 5.08 east 1080.2 Blanca 5,745 6.84 se 788.4 Blanca 1,945 0.30 north 1071.9 Pikes Pk 3,010 1.21 north 963.9 Pikes Pk ** 5,110 3.83 east 1030.7 to Hell Gate * Glacier NP, one of the top contenders in the lower 48 for big, steep faces. ** I deemed this the maximum vertical for Pikes, though it is subjective.
Davis Peak from Little Jack Mtn.
Davis Peak from Little Jack Mtn.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
polarbear-
Guest




polarbear-
Guest
PostMon Jun 02, 2003 7:46 pm 
So where would Mt. Stuart fall in that list (or do we have to wait until next Spring)?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote View IP address of poster
Blake
Member
Member


Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 326 | TRs | Pics
Location: offtrail
Blake
Member
PostMon Jun 02, 2003 8:21 pm 
That is very cool! i'm surprised that Mcgregor doesn't go down a mile within a radius of one mile from the top, i think it must be close, since that pretty much towers above a valley 7,000 feet below.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
-lol-
Member
Member


Joined: 17 Dec 2001
Posts: 767 | TRs | Pics
-lol-
Member
PostMon Jun 02, 2003 8:43 pm 

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Backpacker Joe
Blind Hiker



Joined: 16 Dec 2001
Posts: 23956 | TRs | Pics
Location: Cle Elum
Backpacker Joe
Blind Hiker
PostMon Jun 02, 2003 8:55 pm 
Good lord. You are a sick man/woman! winksmile.gif agree.gif winksmile.gif That is a LOT of information. Thanks. TB

"If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide." — Abraham Lincoln
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
rubberlegs
Guest




rubberlegs
Guest
PostMon Jun 02, 2003 9:43 pm 
Steve Fry published a similar list in the old Signpost Magazine about 15-20 years ago. I have a copy at work... he measured steepest faces in 0.1 and 1.0 miles. Mt Baring was the steepest face in 0.1 miles horizontal. He had some data on non-Cascade peaks for comparison also...

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote View IP address of poster
smmslt
Prominencian



Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Posts: 89 | TRs | Pics
Location: Vancouver, WA
smmslt
Prominencian
PostMon Jun 02, 2003 10:54 pm 
Metzler went beyond Cliff Measure to devise a formula for computing the "impressiveness" of an entire mountain, factoring local relief and slope of a peak against the surrounding terrain. The discussion of Spire Measure and a number of interesting links can be found here. Pretty interesting stuff.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
rubberlegs
Guest




rubberlegs
Guest
PostMon Jun 02, 2003 11:08 pm 
Jim Brisbine attempts a "projection" measurement on his list of major peaks: Washington's Major Peaks

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote View IP address of poster
papps
Guest




papps
Guest
PostTue Jun 03, 2003 8:04 am 
rubberlegs wrote:
Steve Fry published a similar list in the old Signpost Magazine about 15-20 years ago. I have a copy at work... he measured steepest faces in 0.1 and 1.0 miles. Mt Baring was the steepest face in 0.1 miles horizontal. He had some data on non-Cascade peaks for comparison also...
When I initially skimmed the post I thought maybe "killer" was Mr Fry? Either way, little peaks with big faces are one of the things that makes the Cascades so special. IMO. Another view of Davis.
Davis from Heaven
Davis from Heaven

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote View IP address of poster
Killer
Member
Member


Joined: 16 May 2003
Posts: 51 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Killer
Member
PostTue Jun 03, 2003 10:59 am 
Thanks for the photo. I couldn't find that view anywhere on the Internet.
Quote:
Polarbear - where would Mt. Stuart fall in that list
Stuart 4,750 2.25 north 1356.7 Stuart is impressive with spires and cliffs in all directions, but it doesn't fair as well on this measurement, which measures only one angle. It isn't as steep top to bottom as a cliff like Big Four, and the valleys are less than 5000ft or so below Stuart, which is not a big number compared to other NCasc peaks. Still, Stuart is one of my favorites and just goes to show that numbers ain't everything. Check out Metzler's spire measure for a truer rank.
Quote:
tk-421 - what determines which direction you make your measurements?
I tried to choose the direction and distance that would yield the best numbers. Usually it was the deepest valley, sometimes the steepest face.
Quote:
Mt. Si has a pretty impressive CM if you measure the west slope
Si 3,760 1.10 west 1477.6 Finally, the credit it deserves!
Quote:
smmslt - Metzler went beyond Cliff Measure to devise a formula for computing the "impressiveness" of an entire mountain
Yeah, Metzler's work is amazing. If you haven't clicked that link you are crazy. I didn't realize he updated his site recently. Nice. He's probably got a few more tricks up his sleeve.
Quote:
Rubberlegs - Steve Fry published a similar list in the old Signpost Magazine
I have heard about Fry's article but couldn't find it on WTA's web archive. That would have saved some time smile.gif Anyone know of a link? "This post is in no way an endorsement of Alice Cooper, his music, or his political views."

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
paps
Member
Member




paps
Member
PostTue Jun 03, 2003 11:31 am 
Killer wrote:
Thanks for the photo. I couldn't find that view anywhere on the Internet.
your welcome, but I didn't get it from the internet. wink.gif

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
rubberlegs
Guest




rubberlegs
Guest
PostTue Jun 03, 2003 11:50 am 
"Washington's Steepest Mountain Faces", from Signpost April 1984, pp 14-17. In .1 mile, in order, top 5: Baring, S Hozomeen, Davis, SE Twin Spire, Index... ah what the heck... Copper Lake Wall, bear Mt, N Pk Garfield, Booker, SW Hozomeen, SW Hozomeen again???, Tomyhoi, Peak 7895 (Mt Spickard quad), Shuksan, Three Fingers, Bullen, S Hozomeen again?!!, Hozomeen (yawn... again...), Pass Creek Cliff (USGS Mt Challenger, S end Mineral Mt massif), Lemah. In 1 mile: Davis, Johannesburg, Luna, Elephant, Hozomeen, Colonial, McMillan Spire, Whitehorse, Rainier, Jack, S Hozomeen, Colonial again, Chimney Pk, Storm King, Shuksan, Buck, Spickard, Peak 6972 (Snowfield Peak massif, USGS Ross Dam), Terror, Booker.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote View IP address of poster
Miss Normandy
Member
Member


Joined: 23 May 2003
Posts: 171 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Miss Normandy
Member
PostSun Jun 08, 2003 11:07 am 
Somebody posted something a week or so back about a hike in the CR Gorge (or was it somewhere else in Oregon?) that was like Si in the great vertical climb in only 5 miles... well I'm going to be in the Portland area for a week and I wanted to check it out but I've been scouring the site and I can't find it anywhere. Little help? I think it had the word Creek in the name.

Support Search and Rescue. GET LOST!
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
-florida
Guest




-florida
Guest
PostSun Jun 08, 2003 11:14 am 
Mt Defiance/Starvation Creek...

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote View IP address of poster
-florida
Guest




-florida
Guest
PostSun Jun 08, 2003 11:26 am 
more info.... Starvation Ridge Trail is probably the one you are talking about... 5.6 miles 3000' elev. in less than 4 miles (total gain 3600') The trail is described in the Falcon Guide "Hiking the Columbia River Gorge" It would probably be worth picking it up. Or I could probably copy and fax to you somewhere.... Just a thought....

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote View IP address of poster
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Trail Talk > North Cascades Biggest/Steepest - the numbers
  Happy Birthday noahk!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum