Forum Index > Photography Talk > Digital Backup & Recovery
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
MCaver
Founder



Joined: 14 Dec 2001
Posts: 5124 | TRs | Pics
MCaver
Founder
PostMon Nov 10, 2003 9:08 pm 
Anyone have experneice with lightweight recovery mechanisms? I'm thinking more of parity and recovery files than things like tape backup systems of CDs. I've been thinking that burning my photos to CD would be a lot more resilient if I had data recovery mechanisms built in on the CD itself (and a backup CD copy of course). I have some experience with parity files, but the software for creating them doesn't seem to like subdirectories, with I make extensive use of. I'd hate to have to make parity files for every directory! I've tried both SmartPar and QuickPar. Anyone have any expereince or suggestions in this area?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
MCaver
Founder



Joined: 14 Dec 2001
Posts: 5124 | TRs | Pics
MCaver
Founder
PostMon Nov 10, 2003 10:31 pm 
If anyone cares tongue.gif I'm thinking of using PAR2 to create recovery files for each subdirectory of my photos, breaking them into 700Mb chunks and burning them to CDs, recovery records and all. Eventually I'd like to end up with 2 archive hard drives (one off site) and maybe a CD copy somewhere for easy use. For now, 2 CDs and a hard drive. Anyone shoot holes in this plan? The recovery files take up an additional 10% of space, but it's worth it for the protection.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
MCaver
Founder



Joined: 14 Dec 2001
Posts: 5124 | TRs | Pics
MCaver
Founder
PostMon Nov 10, 2003 10:34 pm 
Eeks! I have 14,671 photos, taking up 30Gb! eek.gif

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Tom
Admin



Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 17854 | TRs | Pics
Tom
Admin
PostMon Nov 10, 2003 10:50 pm 
Wouldn't DVD be a better backup option? DVD burners are getting reasonably cheap at a little over $100 AR and I think the extra space / less hassle would be worth it. My computer came with a DVD+RW burner but I've been to lazy to get everything organized and backup my HD. The parity recovery files seem like a good idea. For now I got a 160 GB hard drive for $75 which is my primary backup.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
MCaver
Founder



Joined: 14 Dec 2001
Posts: 5124 | TRs | Pics
MCaver
Founder
PostMon Nov 10, 2003 10:53 pm 
A DVDR would be great if I had the $$ but I'm strapped until after the holidays, and maybe beyond. bawl.gif

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Slugman
It’s a Slugfest!



Joined: 27 Mar 2003
Posts: 16874 | TRs | Pics
Slugman
It’s a Slugfest!
PostMon Nov 10, 2003 11:39 pm 
I just got an 80 gig external hard drive for $100, but it came with Norton Ghost so I feel extra secure. I also just purchased the McAfee Internet Security suite for $70 and a $40 mail-in rebate. It should keep out most threats. If the house catches fire, I just grab the external and head for safety. I was going to get a CD burner for backup, but Tanja pointed out that our 600mhz computer was semi-obsolete, and any new computer likely would have a CD or DVD burner installed. Up until now, I've had no firewall, no backup, no nothing. Talk about living dangerously!

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Sore Feet
Member
Member


Joined: 16 Dec 2001
Posts: 6307 | TRs | Pics
Location: Out There, Somewhere
Sore Feet
Member
PostTue Nov 11, 2003 1:23 am 
DVDs would be the easier way to go hassle wise, imo. Except that writable DVDs are hella expensive compared to CDRs.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Dayhike Mike
Bad MFKer



Joined: 02 Mar 2003
Posts: 10958 | TRs | Pics
Location: Going to Tukwila
Dayhike Mike
Bad MFKer
PostTue Nov 11, 2003 1:26 am 
MCaver wrote:
If anyone cares tongue.gif I'm thinking of using PAR2 to create recovery files for each subdirectory of my photos, breaking them into 700Mb chunks and burning them to CDs, recovery records and all. Eventually I'd like to end up with 2 archive hard drives (one off site) and maybe a CD copy somewhere for easy use. For now, 2 CDs and a hard drive. Anyone shoot holes in this plan? The recovery files take up an additional 10% of space, but it's worth it for the protection.
PAR2 is a *great* solution, but you should be able to get by with even less overhead -- even 5% is pretty hardcore, given a small block size. Make folders of 665 megs apiece and generate 35 megs of 128K or 64K blocks. Throw whatever you can fit onto a 700 meg CD and burn it for $0.10 per disc. Heck. Burn two while you're at it. For 30 Gigs, you're looking at 45 discs or so. 90 discs if you burn two copies. Grand total of 9 bucks and a bit of time. Not bad...

"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." -P.J. O'Rourke "Ignorance is natural. Stupidity takes commitment." -Solomon Short
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
MCaver
Founder



Joined: 14 Dec 2001
Posts: 5124 | TRs | Pics
MCaver
Founder
PostTue Nov 11, 2003 1:31 am 
Thanks for the par2 info. I've been running some tests at default block size and 10% redundancy and things look good. Smaller block size would make more sense since I'm trying to protect against sector/block corruption, not entire missing parts. I've been using QuickPar and it's very nice, even integrates into the shell. I already have the CDR hardware so I'm not worried about that. Blanks are cheap.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
H. Hound
Member
Member


Joined: 09 May 2003
Posts: 1205 | TRs | Pics
Location: Exit 32
H. Hound
Member
PostTue Nov 11, 2003 7:07 am 
Before you feel safe and secure with CD backup, you might want to read this article. Personally, I back up everything I care about to a toy server, with mirrored hard drives. If I was feeling really paranoid I would use offline file synchronization and keep synchronized copies on my laptop. Just my 2c - KN

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Alan Bauer
Member
Member


Joined: 11 Jan 2002
Posts: 942 | TRs | Pics
Location: Fall City, Washington
Alan Bauer
Member
PostTue Nov 11, 2003 8:17 am 
I have no faith in CD backups beyond 12 months and this being in a fully dust-free, non-damp or humid or light environment. Therefore the way I have done things is that each year I make sure my data and all photos go through a complete full updated backup from beginning to end (I back up as I go throughout the year the new material). I simply destroy the old set then. What this does is gives me a setup where I always have a backup set on CD that is <12 months old. I also have a 120gb hard disk that is my other backup. For a personal example: a CD of images from a friend of two trips we did together in 2000....three different drives all fail to read it now. But what this story starts to tell follows what I have read and heard from others...major brands like TDK, Maxell, etc... all failing in less than 4 years.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
MCaver
Founder



Joined: 14 Dec 2001
Posts: 5124 | TRs | Pics
MCaver
Founder
PostTue Nov 11, 2003 10:14 am 
Just to clarify, from my earlier post:
MCaver wrote:
I'd like to end up with 2 archive hard drives (one off site) and maybe a CD copy somewhere for easy use.
Hot-swappable hard drives (firewire) will be my primary and secondary backups. CDs will just be for easy use around the house. Everything will have parity files as well for protection against sector/block corruption. This should protect me from anything short of a major local disaster.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Slugman
It’s a Slugfest!



Joined: 27 Mar 2003
Posts: 16874 | TRs | Pics
Slugman
It’s a Slugfest!
PostTue Nov 11, 2003 1:16 pm 
I remember when CDs were marketed as lasting "forever", but about 1/2 of all the music CDs I've ever bought now don't work. Average Americans screwed by big biz again!

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Malachai Constant
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 16093 | TRs | Pics
Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny
Malachai Constant
Member
PostTue Nov 11, 2003 1:33 pm 
I think the manufactured CD's have a pretty long life if not dirty or scratched because they are nothing more than hoes burnt in an Al film. The burnt ones are made by a photo process and deteriorate over time even if unplayed.

"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Tom
Admin



Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 17854 | TRs | Pics
Tom
Admin
PostSun Dec 07, 2003 1:04 am 
How do you use PAR2? I downloaded something called QuickPar. Is this the program most use? Is there a way to add complete directories? Also, what happens if your parity file goes bad? Or are there parity files on parity files? dizzy.gif

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Photography Talk > Digital Backup & Recovery
  Happy Birthday Lead Dog, dzane, The Lead Dog, Krummholz!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum