Forum Index > Trail Talk > Pratt Valley shifted north in recent Google Earth imagery
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
puzzlr
Mid Fork Rocks



Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 7220 | TRs | Pics
Location: Stuck in the middle
puzzlr
Mid Fork Rocks
PostFri Sep 20, 2013 11:29 pm 
I noticed this because of my recent hike up the Pratt Valley. I don't think it's been this way very long in this area because I probably would have noticed. In fact if you click on the "historical imagery" button in GE, even the most recent imagery in that mode doesn't show this problem. I will be submitting this to the GE feedback forum, but don't have a lot of hope that anything will change. I've submitted a number of mistakes over the years and most of them have never been fixed.
Shifted terrain 1
Shifted terrain 1
Shifted terrain 2
Shifted terrain 2
Shifted terrain 3
Shifted terrain 3

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Joey
verrry senior member



Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 2796 | TRs | Pics
Location: Redmond
Joey
verrry senior member
PostSat Sep 21, 2013 10:59 am 
I noticed the "Shifted terrain 2" issue a couple days ago. Hopefully they have not messed up too many other spots.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
twodogdad
Member
Member


Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Posts: 846 | TRs | Pics
Location: seattle
twodogdad
Member
PostSat Sep 21, 2013 1:43 pm 
Imagine the headache such shifts are to smart-bomb operators. N

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
mtnresqr
Member
Member


Joined: 18 May 2010
Posts: 48 | TRs | Pics
mtnresqr
Member
PostWed Sep 25, 2013 12:40 pm 
Doing a rough check and using UTM, so that distance come out in simply "meters East & North", i checked at the Picture 3 area, and came up with a shift of 128 meters Easting and 209 meters Northing. That is very close to the "error shift" associated with a Datum shift from NAD27 and NAD83. We have plotted that in SAR, and come up with about 90-100 meters Easting by 220 meters Northing. For SAR we checked the entire State of Washington, and averaged to get those figures. So, maybe GoogleEarth is getting older maps at NAD27 and now coming in with NAD83 (WGS84) maps, or vice-versa.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
puzzlr
Mid Fork Rocks



Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 7220 | TRs | Pics
Location: Stuck in the middle
puzzlr
Mid Fork Rocks
PostMon Sep 01, 2014 1:00 pm 
Finally, a year later, new imagery including the Central Cascades has corrected the shifted area in the Pratt Valley. I've run across similar shifts elsewhere but don't look into them as deeply. Now the default view is correct but if you click on the historical imagery the most recent previous view shows the shift. I'm glad this is finally corrected. I submitted a bug last year but I doubt that had much to do with getting it fixed.
The area inside the yellow boundary was shifted on Google Earth imagery for almost a year.
The area inside the yellow boundary was shifted on Google Earth imagery for almost a year.
This update corrected several annoying imagery shifts in the central Cascades
This update corrected several annoying imagery shifts in the central Cascades

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
DRSpalding
Probably riding MTB



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 458 | TRs | Pics
Location: Redmond, WA
DRSpalding
Probably riding MTB
PostMon Sep 01, 2014 7:40 pm 
It's still wrong via GMap and Strava while using the satellite imagery, but Google Earth has it correct. I noticed it because my MTB track up the CCC road, riding out the existing (closed) road, and then onto the CCC trail has me crossing the river in the satellite view! The portion of the image looks to be shifted north by a couple hundred meters.
View larger size in new window If you shift to Topo High USA, you can see that my GPS track is faithfully on the road and trails. Does it normally take "a while" for the images to populate out from Google Earth usage to available to the normal API levels?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Joey
verrry senior member



Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 2796 | TRs | Pics
Location: Redmond
Joey
verrry senior member
PostMon Sep 01, 2014 8:20 pm 
It is simply some misaligned aerial imagery. If you look at the center of this map you can see that the aerial to the right of the center has been incorrectly shifted north. As a result your track shows that you have mastered the trick of walking on water.
View larger size in new window

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
DRSpalding
Probably riding MTB



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 458 | TRs | Pics
Location: Redmond, WA
DRSpalding
Probably riding MTB
PostMon Sep 01, 2014 10:07 pm 
Yes, I understand that. It is, however, correct in Google Earth (the app). I was wondering why the user-API-accessible maps were different and if we could expect the new content to come up aligned properly as it is in Google Earth.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
puzzlr
Mid Fork Rocks



Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 7220 | TRs | Pics
Location: Stuck in the middle
puzzlr
Mid Fork Rocks
PostTue Sep 02, 2014 12:28 am 
I'm sure it will eventually propagate into the Google maps satellite view. Most of the time the imagery is the same. I rarely use that view because I find Google Earth much better for virtual exploring, so I probably won't notice when it catches up. Let us know if you do.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
DRSpalding
Probably riding MTB



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 458 | TRs | Pics
Location: Redmond, WA
DRSpalding
Probably riding MTB
PostTue Sep 02, 2014 3:24 pm 
The imagery dated 7/15/2014 in GE is clearly newer/different than what is being pulled by Gmap4 and Strava. If you look at the sat views of each where the new bridge is going in just to the east of the CCC Trail trailhead and road closure on the Middle Fork Road, you can see the excavation happening and the old bridge is already gone. The view in Gmap4 and Strava show the old bridge and perhaps only a minor amount of prep for the construction from the 7/13/2013 imagery. So, perhaps it will get corrected soon.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
DIYSteve
seeking hygge



Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 12655 | TRs | Pics
Location: here now
DIYSteve
seeking hygge
PostTue Sep 02, 2014 3:38 pm 
I've seen at least two other places with screwy aerial views on the Gmap sat image database during my route planning this summer

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
puzzlr
Mid Fork Rocks



Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 7220 | TRs | Pics
Location: Stuck in the middle
puzzlr
Mid Fork Rocks
PostTue Sep 02, 2014 6:10 pm 
DRSpalding wrote:
you can see the excavation happening and the old bridge is already gone.
Great spotting. That was in July when the creek was diverted, the abutments were in place and the temporary road dipped down into the old creek bed.
MP 10.6 bridge, July 19, 2014
MP 10.6 bridge, July 19, 2014
By now the concrete bridge decking is in place. It's looked like this for several weeks now and I wonder what the next step is.
MP 10.6 bridge, August 16, 2014
MP 10.6 bridge, August 16, 2014

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
DRSpalding
Probably riding MTB



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 458 | TRs | Pics
Location: Redmond, WA
DRSpalding
Probably riding MTB
PostTue Sep 23, 2014 10:14 am 
The new maps, properly aligned, are now showing up in the API driven uses of the sat photos.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
wolffie
Member
Member


Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 2693 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
wolffie
Member
PostTue Sep 23, 2014 1:52 pm 
Maybe it was them who caused to Oso landslide. I don't think they should have a right to go altering our landscape like this. If they go dumping forests onto rivers like that, won't it dam up the river, causing possible dam failure and catastrophic flooding? I'm afraid of them. I've seen Google Maps make lakes that cross contour lines. Anybody who can do that has too much power.

Some people have better things to do with their lives than walking the dog. Some don't.
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
puzzlr
Mid Fork Rocks



Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 7220 | TRs | Pics
Location: Stuck in the middle
puzzlr
Mid Fork Rocks
PostWed Oct 01, 2014 10:04 am 
This is unfortunate. For the year that the imagery was shifted the route of the Middle Fork road was correct. But now in October, 2014 a section of the road has been routed to match the old incorrect shifted imagery. The road route is correct on Google Maps, so I don't know how to go about fixing this. I guess I'll file another bug and wait another year for it to get fixed.
Middle Fork Road Error
Middle Fork Road Error
[Edit] Filed the bug. Already got a response that says a correction has been made but it may be 6 months waah.gif for it to show up in GE.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Trail Talk > Pratt Valley shifted north in recent Google Earth imagery
  Happy Birthday mtnwkr!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum