Forum Index > Full Moon Saloon > "Rescue" on Pacific Crest Trail
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
Ski
><((((°>



Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 12832 | TRs | Pics
Location: tacoma
Ski
><((((°>
PostFri May 22, 2015 10:38 am 
yeah? so tell me, Snowbrushy: when's the last time anybody did anything in Idaho that made any difference anywhere else? who cares what Idaho does? that's the place where they re-elected Larry Craig over and over again.... what can you expect?

"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach. I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Snowbrushy
Member
Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2003
Posts: 6670 | TRs | Pics
Location: South Sound
Snowbrushy
Member
PostFri May 22, 2015 10:40 am 
Ski wrote:
who cares what Idaho does?
Who cares what Oregon does?

Oh Pilot of the storm who leaves no trace Like thoughts inside a dream Heed the path that led me to that place Yellow desert stream.
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Ski
><((((°>



Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 12832 | TRs | Pics
Location: tacoma
Ski
><((((°>
PostFri May 22, 2015 10:43 am 
personally, I don't really care what Oregon does either. isn't Oregon the place where they still won't let you pump your own gas? but what Idaho does makes even less difference.... so who cares?

"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach. I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
hikersarenumber1
Member
Member


Joined: 21 Apr 2015
Posts: 466 | TRs | Pics
hikersarenumber1
Member
PostFri May 22, 2015 11:08 am 
Anyone suggesting charging for rescue is absolutely stupid. SAR would then become professional and it would also become way more expensive. People, all people who participate in outdoor activities would have to purchase rescue insurance. Insurance companies would profit. And if you think it would be cheaper for all you "competent" climbers and backcountry skiers, think again. Your run of the mill incompetent hiker gets lost or scared or tired or twists an ankle or gets cold or whatever. That's cheap. Your helicopter extractions and high angle rescues and avalanche debris searches are spendy and high risk. And don't think the insurance company is going to say, well this guy posts multiple cool trip reports on NWhikers every year and his photography is excellent (not over saturated at all) therefore he knows what he's doing. He gets a lower rate. Nope. A climber is a person climbing. Hell, they probably check your gear. A climber is a person with climbing gear. Skier, a person with ski gear. A hike where you slap on micros pikes to cross a snow field? Mountaineering.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
contour5
Member
Member


Joined: 16 Jul 2003
Posts: 2963 | TRs | Pics
contour5
Member
PostFri May 22, 2015 11:21 am 
Quote:
People like THIS who have no business in the mountains SHOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR THEIR RESCUE! PERIOD!
People like who? Ohioans? Women? Crampon-less un-trailworthy nincompoops in general? I didn't really get a sense of the hikers' competence level from reading the article. They did have emergency satellite gear and were able to survive long enough get helped out. It sounds like they were surprised by icy conditions.
Quote:
The hikers became disoriented on Sunday after losing the trail in an area where snow blanketed the ground and were prevented from returning to their car by icy conditions.
Quote:
"They got into an area that was very steep. There was a lot of snow on the ground, and ice, and they climbed up and were uncomfortable trying to get out of there," Linn County Sheriff Bruce Riley said. "
Quote:
Though deputies located the trio just after 11 p.m. Sunday night, they were not able to bring them to safety until just after 5 a.m. this morning due to the hazardous conditions. The hikers had planned on hiking the Pacific Coast Trail from Hoodoo to the Oregon-Washington border.
So they lost the trail in snow, tried to self rescue and got in over their heads. Could happen to anybody. Even the rescuers considered the conditions hazardous enough to postpone walking them out. Crampons and axes might have prevented them needing to be rescued. But they walked out from a ski area that's been closed all winter for lack of snow. Overall, it sounds like they were reasonably competent and well prepared. They miscalculated on the snow cover, became lost and then got surprised by icy conditions for which they were not fully prepared. There is really no test for hiker competence short of throwing yourself against the elements and recording the outcome.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
contour5
Member
Member


Joined: 16 Jul 2003
Posts: 2963 | TRs | Pics
contour5
Member
PostFri May 22, 2015 11:24 am 
Quote:
well this guy posts multiple cool trip reports on NWhikers every year and his photography is excellent (not over saturated at all) therefore he knows what he's doing. He gets a lower rate.
Wait a minute, what?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
hikersarenumber1
Member
Member


Joined: 21 Apr 2015
Posts: 466 | TRs | Pics
hikersarenumber1
Member
PostFri May 22, 2015 11:27 am 
And don't tell me about what they do in yrope. Higher population density in mountains, less litigious society etc etc

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Chico
Member
Member


Joined: 30 Nov 2012
Posts: 2500 | TRs | Pics
Location: Lacey
Chico
Member
PostFri May 22, 2015 11:41 am 
Ski wrote:
isn't Oregon the place where they still won't let you pump your own gas?
Not knowing any different being from Washington where we pump our own, I've done so in Oregon.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Windstorm
Member
Member


Joined: 16 Dec 2014
Posts: 288 | TRs | Pics
Windstorm
Member
PostFri May 22, 2015 12:26 pm 
If SAR volunteers didn't think it was worth it, they wouldn't go out there to help people without payment. That said, I doubt they would turn down a donation if people felt so inclined. In fact, donating is probably a better use of money than lining the pockets of insurance companies.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
joker
seeker



Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 7953 | TRs | Pics
Location: state of confusion
joker
seeker
PostFri May 22, 2015 2:14 pm 
Ski wrote:
who cares what Idaho does?
Indeed. I very much enjoy visiting some good friends who live in CdA, ID. Let's just say that when they have worked at selling the notion of living there, the state and local politics never features in their pitch. In fact, when they consider moving to Spokane, where they both work, this is one of their motivations.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
hikersarenumber1
Member
Member


Joined: 21 Apr 2015
Posts: 466 | TRs | Pics
hikersarenumber1
Member
PostFri May 22, 2015 4:31 pm 
Windstorm wrote:
If SAR volunteers didn't think it was worth it, they wouldn't go out there to help people without payment. That said, I doubt they would turn down a donation if people felt so inclined. In fact, donating is probably a better use of money than lining the pockets of insurance companies.
I believe it has been said most rescued people do make donations. That is definitely the right thing to do. What's right and what is right to force people to do...two different things. That other thread about risks and deaths on the mountains... do you want insurance companies weighing in on that?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
GrnXnham
Member
Member


Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 363 | TRs | Pics
Location: Graham, WA
GrnXnham
Member
PostSat May 23, 2015 6:14 pm 
Bernardo wrote:
We don't know the details, but they couldn't have been that far from the trailhead given the short amount of time they were hiking. By being unable to walk back, they ended up having to wait all day and a good part of the night for a rescue. I cringe though whenever anyone starts talking about charging for rescues.
How about a co-pay kind of like a lot of people have with medical insurance? You call SAR, you pay the first $500 or something like that? This would cut down on the stupid "I'm tired. Come get me!" calls but if people were in serious danger, they would go ahead and bite the bullet because $500 usually beats dying!

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Snowbrushy
Member
Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2003
Posts: 6670 | TRs | Pics
Location: South Sound
Snowbrushy
Member
PostSat May 23, 2015 7:21 pm 
hikersarenumber1 wrote:
Your run of the mill incompetent hiker gets lost or scared or tired or twists an ankle or gets cold or whatever. That's cheap.
It IS cheap and perhaps later determined it be sooo cheap that it's more of a "training mission" than a "rescue mission". Therefore, a simple non-binding $20.00 donation is requested and will be mailed. PS Spread the word... I'm a big fan of token gestures because they have worked for me in business. It's a token gesture and it seems to make fools think twice.

Oh Pilot of the storm who leaves no trace Like thoughts inside a dream Heed the path that led me to that place Yellow desert stream.
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
hikersarenumber1
Member
Member


Joined: 21 Apr 2015
Posts: 466 | TRs | Pics
hikersarenumber1
Member
PostSun May 24, 2015 5:34 am 
Snowbrushy wrote:
It IS cheap and perhaps later determined it be sooo cheap that it's more of a "training mission" than a "rescue mission". Therefore, a simple non-binding $20.00 donation is requested and will be mailed. PS Spread the word... I'm a big fan of token gestures because they have worked for me in business. It's a token gesture and it seems to make fools think twice.
GrnXnham wrote:
How about a co-pay kind of like a lot of people have with medical insurance? You call SAR, you pay the first $500 or something like that? This would cut down on the stupid "I'm tired. Come get me!" calls but if people were in serious danger, they would go ahead and bite the bullet because $500 usually beats dying!
Sounds like you want these more frequent, cheaper "unjustified" rescues that you deem to be caused by stupidity to subsidize your bigger, justified climbing rescues.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Bernardo
Member
Member


Joined: 08 Feb 2010
Posts: 2174 | TRs | Pics
Location: out and about in the world
Bernardo
Member
PostSun May 24, 2015 11:11 am 
That's not how I read it. I understood that Snowbrushy believes it is good to help out people in need even if they "don't deserve it" (tone of other commentators) because it's just good to be and do good.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Full Moon Saloon > "Rescue" on Pacific Crest Trail
  Happy Birthday treasureblue, CascadeSportsCarClub, PYB78, nut lady!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum