Forum Index > Trail Talk > Body found on Mt. Si
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
car68
Out on the skids



Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 296 | TRs | Pics
Location: Could be anywhere.
car68
Out on the skids
PostMon Jun 29, 2015 12:08 pm 
TLake, If you could unfog your memory I would love to hear what you know. The database is only as good as what was entered. And back in the mid 90's.... Anyway anything would help.

I'm the guy 911 calls.
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
hikermike
Member
Member


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 1238 | TRs | Pics
Location: Tacoma
hikermike
Member
PostMon Jun 29, 2015 1:01 pm 
Nobody noticed 5'7" and size 12 shoes? that's also weird

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
fourteen410
Member
Member


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 2629 | TRs | Pics
fourteen410
Member
PostMon Jun 29, 2015 2:06 pm 
hikersarenumber1 wrote:
Pretty sure the authorities have a database with these things. Also fairly certain said database is more up to date and more easily searched than t lake's memory.
Between you and Kevin, what's with the dismissive attitude? If the authorities thought this case was a slam dunk, they wouldn't ask the public for help. Tlake's recollection could be quite helpful. Perhaps not. Either way, what's the harm in contacting the tip line?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Adohrn
Member
Member


Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Posts: 308 | TRs | Pics
Adohrn
Member
PostMon Jun 29, 2015 2:36 pm 
Hikermike when a forensic anthropologist is determining the age, height, ect.. its always a plus or minus game. Unless you can pin down those numbers conclusively its always better to have a large plus or minus so you don't unnecessarily exclude the person your looking for. The remains after 20 something years of exposure will only be partial making precision much harder. 30-60 should be read 45 +- 15 years. 5.7-6 feet tall should be read 5.9 and 1/2 +- 2 1/2. Sure the guy was unlikely to have been 5.7, but its not impossible that he was.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Seventy2002
Member
Member


Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 512 | TRs | Pics
Seventy2002
Member
PostMon Jun 29, 2015 3:17 pm 
Adohrn wrote:
a case from the 90's would definitely fall through the cracks.
Not necessarily. The NCIC has maintained a Missing Person File since 1975. The ability to match found remains with a reported missing person depends, of course, on the quality of the initial investigation but also on the available information. The system can collect a wide range of identifiers put only if the reporting party can answer the questions or can direct the investigator to someone who can. There are also plenty of people who are pretty much alone in the world. If they disappear there may be no one who feels obligated to report it.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Snowbrushy
Member
Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2003
Posts: 6670 | TRs | Pics
Location: South Sound
Snowbrushy
Member
PostMon Jun 29, 2015 3:28 pm 
hikermike wrote:
Nobody noticed 5'7" and size 12 shoes? that's also weird
Only his girlfriend knows. huh.gif

Oh Pilot of the storm who leaves no trace Like thoughts inside a dream Heed the path that led me to that place Yellow desert stream.
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Randito
Snarky Member



Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 9513 | TRs | Pics
Location: Bellevue at the moment.
Randito
Snarky Member
PostMon Jun 29, 2015 3:30 pm 
Seventy2002 wrote:
There are also plenty of people who are pretty much alone in the world. If they disappear there may be no one who feels obligated to report it.
That is certainly true -- but it seems like in this case their car have been left in the Mt Si Parking lot? After while the car would get impounded. Perhaps if the registration doesn't match any missing persons report, no further investigation is made. Or the only person that might have reported them missing -- gave them a little push...

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
hikersarenumber1
Member
Member


Joined: 21 Apr 2015
Posts: 466 | TRs | Pics
hikersarenumber1
Member
PostTue Jun 30, 2015 2:43 pm 
fourteen410 wrote:
hikersarenumber1 wrote:
Pretty sure the authorities have a database with these things. Also fairly certain said database is more up to date and more easily searched than t lake's memory.
Between you and Kevin, what's with the dismissive attitude? If the authorities thought this case was a slam dunk, they wouldn't ask the public for help. Tlake's recollection could be quite helpful. Perhaps not. Either way, what's the harm in contacting the tip line?
I'd bet a whole paycheck that the law enforcement investigating this will consider and have access to any missing person files that made the local news in the 90s. If it was hey remember that guy visiting your roommate in the 90s that was from Florida? How he said he was going for a hike in Febuary and never came back? Did anyone report him missing? There is no need to waste law enforcement time. The issues with missing person databases are mostly issues across jurisdictions and states. But thanks again for pointing out more innapropriate postings.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Yana
Hater



Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 4212 | TRs | Pics
Location: Out Hating
Yana
Hater
PostTue Jun 30, 2015 7:25 pm 
hikersarenumber1 wrote:
There is no need to waste law enforcement time.
Yet curiously enough, a member of the King County Sheriff's Office said:
car68 wrote:
TLake, If you could unfog your memory I would love to hear what you know. The database is only as good as what was entered. And back in the mid 90's.... Anyway anything would help.

PLAY SAFE! SKI ONLY IN CLOCKWISE DIRECTION! LET'S ALL HAVE FUN TOGETHER!
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
tlake
Member
Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 118 | TRs | Pics
tlake
Member
PostTue Jun 30, 2015 8:26 pm 
car68 wrote:
TLake, If you could unfog your memory I would love to hear what you know. The database is only as good as what was entered. And back in the mid 90's....
I left a email message with the tip line with all I could remember.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
meandering Wa
Member
Member


Joined: 25 Jun 2010
Posts: 1516 | TRs | Pics
Location: Redmond
meandering Wa
Member
PostWed Jul 01, 2015 7:43 am 
tlake that is great. Thank you.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
The Angry Hiker
SAR Blacklistee



Joined: 13 Jun 2008
Posts: 2890 | TRs | Pics
Location: Kentwila
The Angry Hiker
SAR Blacklistee
PostWed Jul 01, 2015 9:36 am 
RandyHiker wrote:
quote="Seventy2002"]There are also plenty of people who are pretty much alone in the world. If they disappear there may be no one who feels obligated to report it.
That is certainly true -- but it seems like in this case their car have been left in the Mt Si Parking lot?[/quote] When was the new trailhead opened? If the body has been up there since the 90's, could he have parked at the OLD Si trailhead? On an average summer weekend, that lot fills up and people park blocks away and hoof-it up the road to the trail head. So if he drove, the car could've been left anywhere. Anyway, that's my contribution to the Mike Hammer Amateur Hour. up.gif

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Ringangleclaw
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 1559 | TRs | Pics
Ringangleclaw
Member
PostWed Jul 01, 2015 9:53 am 
I think that parking lot has been there since I first scaled the Mighty Si in the mid seventies

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Seventy2002
Member
Member


Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 512 | TRs | Pics
Seventy2002
Member
PostWed Jul 01, 2015 11:05 am 
The Angry Hiker wrote:
So if he drove, the car could've been left anywhere.
Yeah, if he drove. One could check for vehicles towed with a certain radius of the trailhead, winnow out the vehicles that were not redeemed, and check the status of their owners. It is unlikely that 25-year-old vehicle impound records are available for study, however.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Malachai Constant
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 16092 | TRs | Pics
Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny
Malachai Constant
Member
PostThu Jul 02, 2015 10:33 am 
New trailhead opened in the early 70's the area around lower old trail and Little Si was clear cut and impassable for at least a decade. Access to Little Si was by trespass from the river in the 1980s used mostly by climbers for practice. In the 1990s DNR got access from the river and Little Si trail built Old Si Trail was reopened. Around 2000 present parking lot opened and river access shut off. Cliffs on Little Si bolted around then.

"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Trail Talk > Body found on Mt. Si
  Happy Birthday Traildad!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum