Forum Index > Full Moon Saloon > What happened to Amelia Earhart - evidential trail Marshall Islands
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
gb
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 6309 | TRs | Pics
gb
Member
PostWed Jul 05, 2017 3:06 pm 
I wouldn't ordinarily pay much credence to anything on the History Channel, but this looks interesting, showing Sunday at 9PM. MSNBC just did a bit on this. Some of the evidence includes the fact that the Marshall Islands made a series of Amelia Earhart stamps, including one of her landing in the Marshall Islands in 1937 and some telling photographs. http://www.history.com/specials/amelia-earhart-the-lost-evidence

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
InFlight
coated in DEET



Joined: 20 May 2015
Posts: 847 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle area
InFlight
coated in DEET
PostWed Jul 05, 2017 9:37 pm 
National news showed a grainy BW photo of some Japanese prisoners. One is supposed to be Earhart, and the other her navigator. https://localtvwdaf.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/photo.jpg?quality=85&strip=all&strip=all Who knows, really hard to tell.

“I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately...” ― Henry David Thoreau
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Seventy2002
Member
Member


Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 512 | TRs | Pics
Seventy2002
Member
PostThu Jul 06, 2017 8:41 am 
InFlight wrote:
a grainy BW photo of some Japanese prisoners.
If we look at the uncropped image we see a group of people congregating at the end of a wharf. No guards, no security of any kind. They don't look like prisoners to me.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
thunderhead
Member
Member


Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 1519 | TRs | Pics
thunderhead
Member
PostThu Jul 06, 2017 9:54 am 
No evidence that that is Earhart, nor is there any evidence it was taken after the disappearance. Some old world war 2 era maritime manuals might be able to ID those 2 freighters to pin down the date, but I have not seen any such evidence yet(which still leaves the old grainy photo clearly unable to ID anyone). And not to mention the obvious, but radio calls clearly indicate they were lost and running low on fuel. The fact that this is a famous "mystery" leads to silly conspiracy theories... but there is no reason to think it was anything more than a flight crew getting lost in a big ocean, in an age when radios and long range flight were in their infancy. Especially when Earhart herself was a pretty poor pilot and neither really understood their new radios(and HF radios suck even with modern technology and good training).

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
gb
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 6309 | TRs | Pics
gb
Member
PostThu Jul 06, 2017 5:26 pm 
For myself, I will withhold judgement until I see the program, which could be fascinating.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
AR
724



Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 1514 | TRs | Pics
Location: Saratoga Passage
AR
724
PostThu Jul 06, 2017 8:59 pm 
If the picture is real, that's obviously them. The ship is towing the exact plane. Which just happens to be all together after ditching. This is like pulling a full scale picture of a UFO landing and former president Nixon shaking the visitors hand, should they have one. No one is going to convince me this picture is real. I'm also going to call out thunderhead for this jab... "Especially when Earhart herself was a pretty poor pilot and neither really understood their new radios" ...how many times did you fly with her?

...wait...are we just going to hang here or go hiking?
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
thunderhead
Member
Member


Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 1519 | TRs | Pics
thunderhead
Member
PostFri Jul 07, 2017 8:39 am 
I base my opinion on those who did fly with her and wrote about it. The consensus in the aviation community is that she was not good. In addition... their lack of understanding of their radios is indisputable... leaving behind antennae that could have increased their ability to navigate. They didn't even understand Morse code, in an era when its use was routine, and when their radio navigation performance would be degraded without it. The fact that they got lost and probably ran out of fuel is not surprising at all.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
DIYSteve
seeking hygge



Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 12655 | TRs | Pics
Location: here now
DIYSteve
seeking hygge
PostFri Jul 07, 2017 9:44 am 
NPR ran an item about it yesterday. The woman interviewed -- who had some level of expertise re such things -- saw it per a reviewer's preview and she was unpersuaded by the allegedly new evidence. But she acknowledged that it was an entertaining show. So it's got that going for it.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Randito
Snarky Member



Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 9513 | TRs | Pics
Location: Bellevue at the moment.
Randito
Snarky Member
PostFri Jul 07, 2017 8:22 pm 
Hitting Howland Island with the equipment they had (and their level of training) would have been a fricking miracle -- yet people feel the need for some sort of complex explanation -- the simple explanation is they missed the island, ran out of fuel, crashed into the sea and were killed on impact or drowned or eaten by sharks -- but that doesn't make for "good television"

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
InFlight
coated in DEET



Joined: 20 May 2015
Posts: 847 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle area
InFlight
coated in DEET
PostFri Jul 07, 2017 11:20 pm 
RandyHiker wrote:
Hitting Howland Island with the equipment they had (and their level of training) would have been a fricking miracle -- yet people feel the need for some sort of complex explanation -- the simple explanation is they missed the island, ran out of fuel, crashed into the sea and were killed on impact or drowned or eaten by sharks -- but that doesn't make for "good television"
There was a US Coast Guard vessel (Itaska) at Howland. Both the ship and Earharts Electra were equipped with radio direction finders. If they had come within 200 miles or so of Howland Island, they would had a very good chance of getting a decent bearing from the on board equipment, or the ships receivers. Locating Howland Island with the USCG support wasn't really a long shot.

“I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately...” ― Henry David Thoreau
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
thunderhead
Member
Member


Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 1519 | TRs | Pics
thunderhead
Member
PostSat Jul 08, 2017 9:22 am 
If Noonan and Earhart understood their radios better, coordinated better with the coast guard, and had not left behind part of the antennae, it certainly would have increased their odds... but even then, given the somewhat cloudy conditions and technology of the era, failure was still possible.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
gb
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 6309 | TRs | Pics
gb
Member
PostSat Jul 08, 2017 10:13 am 
It was very bad weather when they started out and Noonan preferred Celestial Navigation the distance was 2556 NM. Map:
I'd like to see what is presented, then I'll judge.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
InFlight
coated in DEET



Joined: 20 May 2015
Posts: 847 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle area
InFlight
coated in DEET
PostSat Jul 08, 2017 10:33 am 
thunderhead wrote:
If Noonan and Earhart understood their radios better, coordinated better with the coast guard, and had not left behind part of the antennae, it certainly would have increased their odds... but even then, given the somewhat cloudy conditions and technology of the era, failure was still possible.
The missing trailing antenna was strictly for 500hz transmissions. It wouldn't effect the receiver or bendix radio compass. They probably should have had a skilled radio operator for the overwater portions.

“I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately...” ― Henry David Thoreau
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Pyrites
Member
Member


Joined: 16 Sep 2014
Posts: 1884 | TRs | Pics
Location: South Sound
Pyrites
Member
PostSat Jul 08, 2017 11:08 am 
I saw a teaser interview with the talking head pilot they have as a "expert" for the show. Emphasized his combat missions in introduction as if pertinent to analysis of thin evidence. Even in the short interview he did that technique where he advocates while crossing the steep side hill. After it's implied that of course you agree and everything is after is stated as fact. Dixey Ray kept a nuke bomb from her AEC/NRC days. Used it in conspiracy with Weyco to initiate the St Helens explosion. Mission Accomplished. The bands of Sasquatch defending their inner core homeland by vandalizing Weyco's equipment were wiped out. And everyone knows that after a brief hiatus that Weyco's board feet went up in the massive salvage log. It's proof they were ready. And we all agree that sales and profits went up. And the USFS got their Monument to compete with the NPS. See, we have a volcano too. Blah blah. Those old Ham radio guys with their aluminum patch off some other atoll were more credible.

Keep Calm and Carry On? Heck No. Stay Excited and Get Outside!
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Pyrites
Member
Member


Joined: 16 Sep 2014
Posts: 1884 | TRs | Pics
Location: South Sound
Pyrites
Member
PostSat Jul 08, 2017 11:17 am 
And as late as 1950 B-29's transiting to and from Kadena flew at night. If you can get above clouds celestial navigation is rock solid. So you fly at night and land twenty minutes after sunup. If your pilot is cautious the navigator, co-pilot, and bombardier all separately navigate.

Keep Calm and Carry On? Heck No. Stay Excited and Get Outside!
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Full Moon Saloon > What happened to Amelia Earhart - evidential trail Marshall Islands
  Happy Birthday Traildad!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum