Forum Index > Trail Talk > Armstrong Mountain
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
Abert
Member
Member


Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 588 | TRs | Pics
Location: Sequim
Abert
Member
PostTue Nov 28, 2017 5:43 pm 
So where is the highest point of the mountain? Bivouac.com, Peakbagger and some trip reports on this site say it's in Canada. ListsofJohn says it's in the US. The maps (the ones that I've seen, at least) and the new Andrew Kirmse prominence database say it's in the US.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Randito
Snarky Member



Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 9514 | TRs | Pics
Location: Bellevue at the moment.
Randito
Snarky Member
PostTue Nov 28, 2017 7:30 pm 
Not sure why there is confusion:
Armstrong
Armstrong
And Bivouac.com entry says
Quote:
The main summit is in the US
There is some babbling about summit cairns -- but those don't really count a the height of the mountain eh? -- I mean if the height can be changed by building cairns -- it's flat. Besides wandering around in the flattish, tundraish summit region is kinda fun and CBP didn't seem to care about us wandering over and back in the area around Monument 104 when we were up there in 2011

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Stefan
Member
Member


Joined: 17 Dec 2001
Posts: 5093 | TRs | Pics
Stefan
Member
PostWed Nov 29, 2017 1:35 pm 
I agree too that Canada point is higher when you are there.

Art is an adventure.
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Gimpilator
infinity/21M



Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 1684 | TRs | Pics
Location: Edmonds, WA
Gimpilator
infinity/21M
PostWed Nov 29, 2017 2:26 pm 
When in doubt, better to do both. Lots of peaks have nearly equal height summits, but far apart. I can think of a handful in WA and many more around the country. You'll feel better not leaving any doubt.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
raising3hikers
Member
Member


Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 2344 | TRs | Pics
Location: Edmonds, Wa
raising3hikers
Member
PostWed Nov 29, 2017 6:11 pm 
Stefan wrote:
I agree too that Canada point is higher when you are there.
ditto.gif

Eric Eames
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
mike
Member
Member


Joined: 09 Jul 2004
Posts: 6401 | TRs | Pics
Location: SJIsl
mike
Member
PostWed Nov 29, 2017 7:20 pm 
Here's an old scan...

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
cartman
Member
Member


Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 2800 | TRs | Pics
Location: Fremont
cartman
Member
PostThu Nov 30, 2017 9:59 am 
Having been there and making certain I went to the highest point, the summit is in Canada about 100 yards north of the pylon. It's a short class 2/3 scramble up a rocky bit. I wandered around the very broad summit plateau just to confirm there was nothing higher from any other perspective, and there isn't. The map Randyhiker references is wrong.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
DIYSteve
seeking hygge



Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 12655 | TRs | Pics
Location: here now
DIYSteve
seeking hygge
PostThu Nov 30, 2017 10:27 am 
Maybe the U.S. map elevation is incorrect (too high) or maybe the Canadian map elevation mark is incorrect (too low). More likely, both are incorrect. Surveying on the Z axis in wilderness is an imprecise exercise. Marking high points to single digits (meters or feet) is deceptive precision because there's no way surveying methods used to make these maps accurately resolve to 1 meter (or in the case of most U.S. maps, 1 foot) on the Z axis. The Canadian and U.S. respective elevation marks resulted from reference to two different control points. Surveyors and we attorneys who handle boundary line disputes have seen lots of this (although usually on XY axis), e.g., adjacent lots, each a part of different contiguous plats, each surveyed with reference to different control points. (Sometimes they manifest in an overlap, while other times they result in a "no mans land.") This is a good reminder that elevation markings are only as good as the control points and limits of measurement methods used to determine elevation.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
BigBrunyon
Member
Member


Joined: 19 Mar 2015
Posts: 1459 | TRs | Pics
Location: the fitness gyms!!
BigBrunyon
Member
PostThu Nov 30, 2017 12:28 pm 
US is higher in my book! US is always higher when theres a dispute!!!!

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Randito
Snarky Member



Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 9514 | TRs | Pics
Location: Bellevue at the moment.
Randito
Snarky Member
PostThu Nov 30, 2017 2:50 pm 
If GPS measurements indeed show the Canuck high point higher, #45 could call in an air strike and ensure that the US is always #1. What could go wrong?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
ale_capone
Member
Member


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 720 | TRs | Pics
ale_capone
Member
PostFri Dec 01, 2017 8:02 am 
Speaking of monuments, and which is really the tallest.. The new cascadian monolith in Seattle.. tallest building?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Cyclopath
Faster than light



Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Posts: 7758 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Cyclopath
Faster than light
PostFri Dec 01, 2017 9:34 am 
RandyHiker wrote:
I mean if the height can be changed by building cairns -- it's flat.
Huh? Am I misunderstanding something here? You could build a 10 foot cairn on the top of Everest and it would be 10 feet higher.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
RichP
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 5634 | TRs | Pics
Location: here
RichP
Member
PostFri Dec 01, 2017 9:54 am 
If the highpoint is in Canada, might as well continue out on the ridge several miles for an even higher mountain. Watch out for border patrol though. http://www.peakbagger.com/peak.aspx?pid=1777

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
pcg
Member
Member


Joined: 09 Jun 2012
Posts: 334 | TRs | Pics
pcg
Member
PostFri Dec 01, 2017 10:30 am 
RichP wrote:
If the highpoint is in Canada, might as well continue out on the ridge several miles for an even higher mountain. Watch out for border patrol though. http://www.peakbagger.com/peak.aspx?pid=1777
I've never wandered across the border, but have wondered.. Is there an established protocol for legally doing so in the backcountry?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
RichP
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 5634 | TRs | Pics
Location: here
RichP
Member
PostFri Dec 01, 2017 11:17 am 
pcg wrote:
I've never wandered across the border, but have wondered.. Is there an established protocol for legally doing so in the backcountry?
I'm not sure about that. How do PCT hikers do this legally?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Trail Talk > Armstrong Mountain
  Happy Birthday MFreeman!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum