Forum Index > Trail Talk > Big Four Ice Caves in Outside
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
Riverside Laker
Member
Member


Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 2819 | TRs | Pics
Riverside Laker
Member
PostMon Feb 05, 2018 12:29 pm 
Cyclopath wrote:
Fact is 99.99999 % of the people who enter the Ice Cave come away unscathed.
I think the death rate is a lot worse than one out of 10,000,000 visitors. It would be instructive to know.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Chief Joseph
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Posts: 7709 | TRs | Pics
Location: Verlot-Priest Lake
Chief Joseph
Member
PostMon Feb 05, 2018 12:57 pm 
Maybe 1 in 500,000? There have been 4 deaths that I know of and there is really no way of knowing how many people visit there and what percentage of them enter the caves.

Go placidly amid the noise and waste, and remember what comfort there may be in owning a piece thereof.
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Riverside Laker
Member
Member


Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 2819 | TRs | Pics
Riverside Laker
Member
PostMon Feb 05, 2018 11:23 pm 
Maybe we can estimate. I just heard that 6100 people visit Monte Cristo each year. Let's double that. Say the four deaths occurred in 10 years. Then 120,000 people with four deaths is 1 out of 30,000. That gives you a 99.997% chance of all visitors. But maybe only half the visitors enter the cave. So that's 1 death out of 15,000 cromagnons. That's about 99.99%. It's not terribly far from the odds of a firearm accidental death. Most firearm folks think that safety training is a good idea (don't know that percentage). So maybe it's about half as common as firearm accidents, a third as common as drowning in a pool or falling off a ladder, but a couple orders of magnitude less common than motor vehicle accidents and unintentional poisoning. That's why we have lifeguards, seatbelts, and child-proof medicine bottles.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Chief Joseph
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Posts: 7709 | TRs | Pics
Location: Verlot-Priest Lake
Chief Joseph
Member
PostMon Feb 05, 2018 11:48 pm 
I would say that Big 4 gets at least triple the visitors as MC...plus you can still fairly easily get there even when deer creek gate is closed. Plus I think the first fatality was at least 20 years ago? So I am going with 1 in 125k.

Go placidly amid the noise and waste, and remember what comfort there may be in owning a piece thereof.
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Cyclopath
Faster than light



Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Posts: 7745 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Cyclopath
Faster than light
PostTue Feb 06, 2018 1:13 pm 
Riverside Laker wrote:
Maybe we can estimate. I just heard that 6100 people visit Monte Cristo each year. Let's double that. Say the four deaths occurred in 10 years. Then 120,000 people with four deaths is 1 out of 30,000. That gives you a 99.997% chance of all visitors. But maybe only half the visitors enter the cave.
(1) One of the deaths at the Ice Cave was for somebody who did not enter the cave, but only stood in front. So, you can't eliminate people who only went near the cave from your analysis. (2) Also, we need to consider visits not visitors. If the same 1 person goes 2 times, that's 2 opportunities for a bad thing to occur, not 1. (3) Finally, and most importantly, Monte Cristo requires a ~10 mile round trip hike to see, the Ice Cave requires a ~2 mile round trip hike. So instead of halving your estimate, you should more than double it. ... if you're interested in anything resembling accuracy ...

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Cyclopath
Faster than light



Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Posts: 7745 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Cyclopath
Faster than light
PostTue Feb 06, 2018 1:16 pm 
The Big Four Ice Caves Trail, a designated National Recreation Trail,[1] (#723) is one of the most popular hikes in the Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest attracting over 50,000 visitors per year. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Four_Ice_Caves Well damn.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Cyclopath
Faster than light



Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Posts: 7745 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Cyclopath
Faster than light
PostTue Feb 06, 2018 1:23 pm 
So 4 deaths out of 1,000,000 visitors in the last 2 decades. In those same 2 decades, 700,000 Americans died in car accidents. Roughly the same number from guns. To give some context to the numbers. The Big Bad Ice Cave isn't so terrifying when you look at the facts.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
JonnyQuest
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Dec 2013
Posts: 593 | TRs | Pics
JonnyQuest
Member
PostTue Feb 06, 2018 1:51 pm 
Cyclopath wrote:
So 4 deaths out of 1,000,000 visitors in the last 2 decades.In those same 2 decades, 700,000 Americans died in car accidents. Roughly the same number from guns. To give some context to the numbers.
Seems insignificant. But to really provide context, we'd need to know total number of drives (not drivers, but drives) or interactions with guns over those 2 decades.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
RumiDude
Marmota olympus



Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 3591 | TRs | Pics
Location: Port Angeles
RumiDude
Marmota olympus
PostTue Feb 06, 2018 4:01 pm 
Every analagy is imperfect but let me try a new one. I haven't read every post in this thread, but I don't think it has been used. Going into and near the Big 4 ice caves is like playing in the street. Growing up in the Midwest almost every kid I knew played in the street at one time or another. Most of us survived just fine. A few had some close calls. A few were actually hit by automobiles, suffering various degrees of injury. My best friend as a child had a long scar from behind his left ear to the top of his head as a result of an auto striking him while he was playing in the street. A relatively few of those struck by autos were killed. So that's my analogy, though imperfect it kinda fits. Most get by with no issues. But when something bad does happen, it is usually serious to the extreme. And that is why when I became a parent myself, I told my kids not to play in the street. As a side note, I took my two adolescent boys to Spider Meadow three or four times during their teen years. Usually there were similar piles of snow/ice with caves along the cliff sides of the valley. I would generally let them wander on their own in the evening, but with strict instructions not to enter those ice caves. Rumi

"This is my Indian summer ... I'm far more dangerous now, because I don't care at all."
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Jim Dockery
Member
Member


Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 3092 | TRs | Pics
Location: Lake Stevens
Jim Dockery
Member
PostThu Feb 08, 2018 10:43 am 
Chief Joe - your comparison to climbing is true in a way (both involve objective danger), but exploring the caves (like you and Scrooge used to do) is more like a climber purposely spending a summer day in a steep avalanche prone gully with an ice cliff looming overhead - no-one does that. As an alpine climber I learned to asses objective danger and try to mitigate it. Of course the obvious first choice would be to avoid such climbs, but some of the most beautiful and challenging routes involve at least some objective danger, so we study them, then choose the best season and time of day to climb them. When ever passing under obvious danger (ice cliffs or rock fall zones - like that posed by the ice caves) we try to cross below when it's coldest - at night or early morning - and/or moving as fast as possible. Many times we stop and rest at the edge of debris fields, then sprint across (as best we can in boots and crampons) to the other side, where we catch our breath when out of danger. I did the same in the caves once years ago when I was there on a below freezing fall day for ice climbing practice. I hurried far enough in to get a couple shots looking out, then quickly exited, feeling lucky because I knew that I'd taken a bit of a chance. I've never gone back in because my risk tolerance is going down with old age (I've used up most of my 9 lives) and the pictures weren't that good anyway rolleyes.gif Of course realistic assessment of the danger takes some mountain experience that most hikers on this super easy trail don't have. The other problem is that warm summer days, when ice fall danger is highest, is when most people go there. This is our go-to walk to show off the local mountains to non-hiking family and friends so I've been there many times. When avalanche danger from the looming face above is low (later in the summer or fall) we always walk up close enough to look inside and feel the cool breeze while staying well clear of any icefall. A few times I've been there when other people enter and I've pointed out the big blocks of ice on the ground and that that people have died recently right there when hit. At least once that got the person to stop, snap a shot, then exit a bit quicker than they might have otherwise. I'm so happy they reopened the trail and do feel that the long closure was ridiculous. If we followed that logic every easy access river, trail along a cliff, and ocean beach in the country would have to be closed to save people from themselves (see the recent thread about the two women killed clamming).

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Kim Brown
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 6900 | TRs | Pics
Kim Brown
Member
PostThu Feb 08, 2018 10:51 am 
Jim Dockery wrote:
I'm so happy they reopened the trail and do feel that the long closure was ridiculous. If we followed that logic every easy access river, trail along a cliff, and ocean beach in the country would have to be closed to save people from themselves (see the recent thread about the two women killed clamming).
Yes, but (there's always a "but") I think the Tam lawsuit and the threat of yet another lawsuit helped drive that decision as well as how the Big 4 Ice Caves trail is managed. Statistics aside, if there were no lawsuits and if the USFS and the public weren't comprised of people feeling really bad about the little girl's death, there wouldn't likely be signs, warnings, and public meetings about how best to reduce the chance of repeat accidents.

"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area." Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Foist
Sultan of Sweat



Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 3974 | TRs | Pics
Location: Back!
Foist
Sultan of Sweat
PostThu Feb 08, 2018 1:15 pm 
Kim Brown wrote:
True. I have watched people stop, look at Grace's memorial, then proceed to step over the rock wall, with their innocent, trusting toddlers in-hand, and walk to the caves. There's another warning on the trail before the obvious terminus that people step over to go off-trail to get to the caves. It bothers me that they take their little kids there, who can't make the decision to stay away. Their lives are in the hands of the adults they trust.
All right, now you're going a little overboard. That rock wall and "obvious terminus" is REALLY far from the ice caves. I understand that in winter or spring there is enough snow that an avalanche could possibly, theoretically reach that far, but in summer the terminus is absurdly far from any actual danger.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Foist
Sultan of Sweat



Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 3974 | TRs | Pics
Location: Back!
Foist
Sultan of Sweat
PostThu Feb 08, 2018 1:23 pm 
Cyclopath wrote:
So 4 deaths out of 1,000,000 visitors in the last 2 decades. In those same 2 decades, 700,000 Americans died in car accidents. Roughly the same number from guns. To give some context to the numbers. The Big Bad Ice Cave isn't so terrifying when you look at the facts.
In addition to the lack of any denominator on the gun and car accident deaths, you don't know how many of those 1,000,000 visitors actually entered the caves. We all know a significant number do, but I'd venture it's less than half. How much less? No idea.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
olderthanIusedtobe
Member
Member


Joined: 05 Sep 2011
Posts: 7709 | TRs | Pics
Location: Shoreline
olderthanIusedtobe
Member
PostThu Feb 08, 2018 2:02 pm 
Ice caves sometimes form beneath the cliffs on the far side of Lake 22, although they are not permanent like the Big 4 caves. I went in one of them during one low snow early winter, probably December. Temperature was probably near freezing. I figured the chance of collapse was fairly low. I survived. Does that mean I'm stupid? I don't think I've ever gone in the Big 4 caves, although I've been at the edge of them a couple times. They are long gone, but weren't some ice caves up above Paradise in MRNP a big draw back in the day?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Kim Brown
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 6900 | TRs | Pics
Kim Brown
Member
PostThu Feb 08, 2018 3:02 pm 
Foist wrote:
Kim Brown wrote:
True. I have watched people stop, look at Grace's memorial, then proceed to step over the rock wall, with their innocent, trusting toddlers in-hand, and walk to the caves. There's another warning on the trail before the obvious terminus that people step over to go off-trail to get to the caves. It bothers me that they take their little kids there, who can't make the decision to stay away. Their lives are in the hands of the adults they trust.
All right, now you're going a little overboard. That rock wall and "obvious terminus" is REALLY far from the ice caves. I understand that in winter or spring there is enough snow that an avalanche could possibly, theoretically reach that far, but in summer the terminus is absurdly far from any actual danger.
How am I doing overboard? I didn't make it up; it does end at an obvious terminus, and I have witnessed what I said I did. The terminus ends at the most logical place is the main reason it ends there. Up slope, near vegetation where it can be best defined and the view of the caves are better seen from there than down.

"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area." Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Trail Talk > Big Four Ice Caves in Outside
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum