Forum Index > Trail Talk > Wonderland Trail in Peril at Winthrop Creek Crossings
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
Sculpin
Member
Member


Joined: 23 Apr 2015
Posts: 1377 | TRs | Pics
Sculpin
Member
PostSun Jul 29, 2018 11:25 am 
My group barely made it across Winthrop Creek on the Wonderland Trail on Thursday, July 26. With the high temperatures, the water came up and displaced the boulders holding up the crossing log. The log was down in the water at one end, and while there was no water coming over the top, the top was wet. The handrail is gone. A little more water and you are not getting across that creek, it was roaring like the Carbon River. I crawled it, which worked out fine. A couple of hikers told us that there was no means to cross the White River on the Northern Loop. That means that if the log becomes impassible across Winthrop Creek, there will be no Wonderland circuit until the NPS does some repairs. If anyone has a more recent update that would help.

Between every two pines is a doorway to the new world. - John Muir
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
philfort
Member
Member


Joined: 02 Sep 2003
Posts: 444 | TRs | Pics
Location: seattle
philfort
Member
PostSun Jul 29, 2018 11:33 am 
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
AlpineRose
Member
Member


Joined: 08 May 2012
Posts: 1953 | TRs | Pics
AlpineRose
Member
PostSun Jul 29, 2018 1:08 pm 
Crossing rivers is a critical backcountry skill. Until the bridges are rebuilt, WT and NL hikers will need to learn it. As well as develop decision making skills on deciding whether or not to turn back, if a safe crossing cannot be found.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Bluebird
suffering optional



Joined: 22 Jan 2014
Posts: 200 | TRs | Pics
Location: United States
Bluebird
suffering optional
PostSun Jul 29, 2018 10:35 pm 
We crossed the White River ford last Tuesday. It was incredibly difficult for me at 9:45am and I am strong. Water came up to the crotch of my pants, most of it was mid thigh depth. I'm 5'5" tall. I called Rainier to discuss trail conditions afterwards (we had been camping in some cross-country zones near Windy Gap and had bear-ventures to report) and mentioned the difficulty of this crossing. The ranger simply kept repeating that they warn everyone about how dangerous it is, etc. The ranger stated that they would have the trail crew there to replace the footlog as soon as possible, but it sounded lower priority than the Wonderland crossings.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Sculpin
Member
Member


Joined: 23 Apr 2015
Posts: 1377 | TRs | Pics
Sculpin
Member
PostMon Jul 30, 2018 7:01 am 
philfort wrote:
Uh-oh... is this one of those crossings?
Yes. frown.gif I think when you charge folks a non-refundable fee for a chance to win, and they win the lottery and get a Wonderland permit, there is an expectation that the route can actually be hiked. The NPS trail crews seemed pre-occupied with hazard trees in the campgrounds, a bit ironic considering the danger at the river crossings. huh.gif

Between every two pines is a doorway to the new world. - John Muir
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
silence
Member
Member


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 4420 | TRs | Pics
silence
Member
PostMon Jul 30, 2018 7:59 am 
That is so sad. frown.gif A couple of years ago we actually turned back at the South Mowich when the log bridge across it went out unexpectedly (and unbeknownst to the rangers) in summer (after they had installed it for the season) ... but some WLers went ahead and forded the rushing water, mostly because they did not want to give up on their trip. You can't blame them, but I guess we all know that the park makes it clear that the risk is our choice. We were just doing an in and out for a few days so it was no big deal for us. Fortunately, everyone made it across safely before they were able to reinstall the bridge.

PHOTOS FILMS Keep a good head and always carry a light bulb. – Bob Dylan
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Sculpin
Member
Member


Joined: 23 Apr 2015
Posts: 1377 | TRs | Pics
Sculpin
Member
PostMon Jul 30, 2018 8:41 am 
silence wrote:
some WLers went ahead and forded the rushing water, mostly because they did not want to give up on their trip
That is definitely part of it. But there is also the fact that your only legal campsite is on the other side of that river, and hiking out the same day may not be an option. Now what? Find a flat spot in the woods where the rangers won't find you? paranoid.gif The point I am making is that the heavy NPS restrictions inevitably create an expectation that you will be able to safely follow them.

Between every two pines is a doorway to the new world. - John Muir
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Kim Brown
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 6900 | TRs | Pics
Kim Brown
Member
PostMon Jul 30, 2018 8:44 am 
Sculpin wrote:
The NPS trail crews seemed pre-occupied with hazard trees in the campgrounds, a bit ironic considering the danger at the river crossings. huh.gif
But as you said, the onus is on the hiker to understand dangers inherent in back country travel. Car campers who come from all walks of life camping at a campground have a reasonable expectation that hazard trees would be removed, and the Park has a duty to reasonably forsee hazard trees at a car campground or picnic area and remove them.

"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area." Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
kiliki
Member
Member


Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 2327 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
kiliki
Member
PostMon Jul 30, 2018 10:41 am 
^^^ Ditto. I don't agree that "heavy restrictions" create an expectation that everything will be predictable and you will be able to do exactly what you were permitted for. It's nature. There are a ton of things that can happen. What is the park supposed to do, let it always be a free for all because sometimes there might be an obstacle that hinders a plan?
Quote:
But there is also the fact that your only legal campsite is on the other side of that river, and hiking out the same day may not be an option. Now what? Find a flat spot in the woods where the rangers won't find you?
If I couldn't safely make my legal campsite, I would have no qualms about finding a flat spot where I was and explaining the situation to any ranger I happened to see (and I rarely do see any in the backcountry there). I have no doubt the park would rather have you camp "illegally" than recover your body downstream of the crossing.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Randito
Snarky Member



Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 9513 | TRs | Pics
Location: Bellevue at the moment.
Randito
Snarky Member
PostMon Jul 30, 2018 11:43 am 
Sculpin wrote:
The point I am making is that the heavy NPS restrictions inevitably create an expectation that you will be able to safely follow them.
I think these restrictions exist only in the minds of people with authority issues. E.G. A few years ago a snowshoer got lost in the Mazama ridge area and had to spend an unplanned night out. He agonized over using his currency as tinder for a fire because he believed he would get in trouble for destruction of currency and for building a fire in an area where campfires are not permitted. Of course when he was located by searchers, there was simply relief that he was located intact and the rangers had no interest in issuing an illegal campfire fine or alerting the NSA. Visitor safety is the top priority emphasized in all my volunteer work at Mt Rainier National Park.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
AlpineRose
Member
Member


Joined: 08 May 2012
Posts: 1953 | TRs | Pics
AlpineRose
Member
PostMon Jul 30, 2018 12:36 pm 
I agree a permit holder might have a "reasonable expectation" that the WT can be completed safely. But the WT is still the backcountry, and MRNP is not Disneyland. If one's reasonable expectation does not match what is staring one right in the face, such as a river crossing too dangerous to navigate, it's time to alter that expectation and make a new plan. Yes, that might mean getting behind your itinerary if you decide to wait until the early morning to see if the water level lowers enough to cross safely. Or it might mean backtracking and camping at unofficial sites on your way out. It's bears repeating, crossing rivers is a valuable (life saving) skill all backcountry travelers should learn. That skill set includes both crossing techniques and decision making - deciding whether or not a river can be crossed safely with the techniques you've learned. You can't leave your brain or your common sense at home just because you have a permit, there are restrictions, and you're worried about what the rangers might say. imo, river crossings are the wilderness hazard most routinely underappreciated.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Brushbuffalo
Member
Member


Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Posts: 1887 | TRs | Pics
Location: there earlier, here now, somewhere later... Bellingham in between
Brushbuffalo
Member
PostMon Jul 30, 2018 5:18 pm 
kiliki wrote:
If I couldn't safely make my legal campsite, I would have no qualms about finding a flat spot where I was and explaining the situation to any ranger I happened to see (and I rarely do see any in the backcountry there). I have no doubt the park would rather have you camp "illegally" than recover your body downstream of the crossing.
Sometimes regs.are very impractical. agree.gif I have a similar story. In 1999 I had climbed Rainier and after dinner in Ashford on our long summIt day ( typical midnight start) I was driving over to Crystal Mountain to run the White River 50 mile. I very nearly fell asleep twice on the Stevens Canyon Road, and realizing the peril of the situation, I pulled into the Box Canyon day use area to sleep, illegally.. I figured if a ranger came along late at night to roust me out and along I would just say " With due respect, either you let me sleep here, or you could drag my dead body and crushed car out of the canyon." I had a restful night's sleep with no need for a plea.

Passing rocks and trees like they were standing still
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Kim Brown
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 6900 | TRs | Pics
Kim Brown
Member
PostMon Jul 30, 2018 5:30 pm 
You may get a ticket, but I doubt they'd make you leave in the middle of the night I also doubt they'd be patrolling the middle of the night! I've seen people escorted out of the Enchantments in the day time, and read a WTA report where a couple got a ticket plus escorted after they were busted at camp in the early morning. But yeah, safety first; doesn't mean you won't get a ticket.

"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area." Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
kiliki
Member
Member


Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 2327 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
kiliki
Member
PostWed Aug 01, 2018 8:33 am 
Sounds like there is an easy work around for this crossing-- the park put this out: The log footbridge that spans the White River (adjacent to the White River Campground) and is part of the Wonderland Trail is partially submerged with water flowing over the log. Attempting to cross can be extremely dangerous. Do not attempt to cross footbridges with water running over them. To bypass the bridge, the easy alternate route is to walk the campground road to the Sunrise Road, and cross the road bridge over the White River. Just past the road bridge is a minor trailhead where visitors can get back on the Wonderland Trail. Recent hot weather has created hazardous conditions along many streams and rivers within the park. If you are in the backcountry and are confronted with a potential stream crossing without a bridge, consider this advice on crossing streams safely (or whether to cross at all): https://go.usa.gov/xUvw7 Further information on trail conditions is found at https://go.usa.gov/xUvwA ~cr

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
silence
Member
Member


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 4420 | TRs | Pics
silence
Member
PostWed Aug 01, 2018 8:37 am 
Not the same White River crossing.

PHOTOS FILMS Keep a good head and always carry a light bulb. – Bob Dylan
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Trail Talk > Wonderland Trail in Peril at Winthrop Creek Crossings
  Happy Birthday theCougAbides!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum