Forum Index > Trail Talk > Time for a permit system in areas of the Cascades?
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
ree
Member
Member


Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Posts: 4399 | TRs | Pics
ree
Member
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 11:06 am 
Certain places in the Cascades are getting overrun. Impact and crowding is becoming more evident. Social media has definitely increased popularity of areas of the Cascades. (Alpine Lakes Wilderness in particular.) What do you think of a permit system? Besides ameliorating impact, think of hiking 10 miles into a place, and finding only the crappiest camp left... If you find one at all. Think of a long 10 mile hike in to a gorgeous alpine lake and finding SEVEN rafts floating on it. It's happened to us! So what do you think of a permit system? Yes/No/Maybe?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
ree
Member
Member


Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Posts: 4399 | TRs | Pics
ree
Member
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 11:12 am 
I say yes. Rec.gov does a good job of it in the Sierras. I think it should be cheap, so as not to impact people in poverty. I could really go on a big tirade about permits in North Cascades, but they should give it up to rec.gov too. Their permit system is for the birds. Alpine Lakes is long overdue for a permit system. That place has been loved to death for years and everyone just stands by watching it happen. So I say yes.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Brian R
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2018
Posts: 501 | TRs | Pics
Brian R
Member
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 11:16 am 
Are you a California transplant, by any chance?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
MtnGoat
Member
Member


Joined: 17 Dec 2001
Posts: 11992 | TRs | Pics
Location: Lyle, WA
MtnGoat
Member
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 11:41 am 
nope. the permit system merely squishes the tube and pushes users to new places, which then engenders the demands to expand permit systems again...and repeat. Even the precedent of permit systems has been a bad thing, for this reason. open more trailheads and access points to spread the impacts. more money for trail maintenance, roads, TH's, etc.

Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock. - Will Rogers
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
markweth
Member
Member


Joined: 08 Feb 2017
Posts: 155 | TRs | Pics
Location: Montana
markweth
Member
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 1:33 pm 
MtnGoat wrote:
open more trailheads and access points to spread the impacts. more money for trail maintenance, roads, TH's, etc.
I'd much rather see this than permits, but unfortunately I think permits will happen before any additional funding is allocated for roads, trails, etc. Just a sad reality.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Cyclopath
Faster than light



Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Posts: 7716 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Cyclopath
Faster than light
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 1:39 pm 
As long as the permit system applies to other people and not me, sure!

reststep
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Ski
><((((°>



Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 12824 | TRs | Pics
Location: tacoma
Ski
><((((°>
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 1:51 pm 
so... how's that permit system working out up in the Alpine Lakes area? Seven Lakes Basin? Jefferson Park? doesn't sound to me like people are real happy with the systems currently in place. maybe I'm misinterpreting everything.

"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach. I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Bedivere
Why Do Witches Burn?



Joined: 25 Jul 2008
Posts: 7464 | TRs | Pics
Location: The Hermitage
Bedivere
Why Do Witches Burn?
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 3:23 pm 
No. There are plenty of uncrowded areas to go, even in the Alpine Lakes. There are certain areas that you just know will be crowded because they get all the attention online. So be it. If I want to go to those areas then I know I'll be dealing with crowds. If I want an uncrowded hike, I know where to go. I don't need government bureaucracy getting between me and my ability to hike where I want, when I want.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Cyclopath
Faster than light



Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Posts: 7716 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Cyclopath
Faster than light
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 3:48 pm 
People who didn't get a permit for one place will go somewhere else. A permit system won't address impact, it will just spread it out somewhat where it's more concentrated now. Unless we hire a lot more rangers to verify permits, many people will ignore the system.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Brian R
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Feb 2018
Posts: 501 | TRs | Pics
Brian R
Member
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 4:09 pm 
"May I zee you papers, please?"

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
markweth
Member
Member


Joined: 08 Feb 2017
Posts: 155 | TRs | Pics
Location: Montana
markweth
Member
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 4:27 pm 
Cyclopath wrote:
A permit system won't address impact, it will just spread it out somewhat where it's more concentrated now.
Do you think this is objectively a bad thing? I think dispersing people is usually a good thing, provided they follow basic LNT.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Cyclopath
Faster than light



Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Posts: 7716 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Cyclopath
Faster than light
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 4:39 pm 
You could make an argument either way. I know that a lot of people think it's better to concentrate impact for example on trails like Si and Mailbox, vs spreading it "everywhere." I think that's better for wildlife. I know there are plenty of "off the beaten track" places to hike without big crowds and if we institute restrictive permits in more and more places, it will be harder to find solitude.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
markweth
Member
Member


Joined: 08 Feb 2017
Posts: 155 | TRs | Pics
Location: Montana
markweth
Member
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 5:01 pm 
Cyclopath wrote:
You could make an argument either way. I know that a lot of people think it's better to concentrate impact for example on trails like Si and Mailbox, vs spreading it "everywhere." I think that's better for wildlife. I know there are plenty of "off the beaten track" places to hike without big crowds and if we institute restrictive permits in more and more places, it will be harder to find solitude.
Yeah, that's about how I feel. I think there is an interesting overlap between places that have been hyped up on social media in recent years and those that have permits, are probably in need of permits, or have recently implemented them. The Enchantments are a good example, as are the Central Cascades in Oregon and Conundrum Hot Springs in Colorado. I'd be curious as to where people who got into hiking in the last few years via social media (which isn't a bad thing, no judgment intended) would go if permits were implemented in Alpine Lakes Wilderness. My guess would be the places outside of there that see the most "ink", for lack of a better word, on Instagram and the Washington Hikers and Climbers Facebook groups. Or maybe sections of the PCT. I doubt many would put in the effort to go to some of the "back of beyond" places in Glacier Peaks Wilderness or the Pasayten, especially since for the most part those places are still a bit under the radar.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
contour5
Member
Member


Joined: 16 Jul 2003
Posts: 2963 | TRs | Pics
contour5
Member
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 5:49 pm 
No permit system, please. Solitude needs to be earned. Nowadays you have to be a little bit clever to find a “perfect” campsite. There are quite literally billions of them. Just go farther. Go off trail. When “the lake” is crowded, climb a hill. I end up doing these things more frequently nowadays, and it’s usually a bonus experience. Permits are a total nightmare for me. I will refuse. Kinda counting on grizzly reintroduction to thin out the untrailworthy...

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Randito
Snarky Member



Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 9512 | TRs | Pics
Location: Bellevue at the moment.
Randito
Snarky Member
PostMon Dec 02, 2019 6:05 pm 
ree wrote:
Certain places in the Cascades are getting overrun. Impact and crowding is becoming more evident
Yogi Berra wrote:
Nobody Goes There Anymore, It’s Too Crowded
The Robins are a location that has gotten a lot of "Enchantments refugees" folks that got skunked for a overnight permit to the Enchantments. The differences in the trail between Tuck and Robin was quite notable between my trip in the '90s and my trip in 2015. More amusing was the cluster of 20 tents camped tightly along the shore and creek between the two Robins. I chose to walk another 1/2 mile and had an isolated camp with a great view of Mt Daniel. Social Media does create intense usage at precisely those locations that are "Instagram famous" However it is my observation that very little independent thinking is required to avoid the herd mentality.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Trail Talk > Time for a permit system in areas of the Cascades?
  Happy Birthday mtnwkr!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum