Forum Index > Full Moon Saloon > Less than 1% of all forests in British Columbia are large, lower elevation old growth
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
JonnyQuest
Member
Member


Joined: 10 Dec 2013
Posts: 593 | TRs | Pics
JonnyQuest
Member
PostMon Jun 22, 2020 6:26 pm 
AE, thanks for enlightening me on Grant Hadwin film. I certainly enjoyed and recommend the book The Golden Spruce. I'd also give a shout out to the book The Tiger, another book by Vaillant. Fascinating read, especially since I was a fan of the 1975 film Dersu Uzala.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Anne Elk
BrontosaurusTheorist



Joined: 07 Sep 2018
Posts: 2419 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Anne Elk
BrontosaurusTheorist
PostMon Jun 22, 2020 6:57 pm 
^^^ up.gif Agreed, JQ. I read "The Tiger" also, after hearing Vaillant speak at Third Place Books in Lake Forest Park. The director of Hadwin's Judgement did a film on that too, titled "Conflict Tiger", which I haven't seen. I'd like to watch Dersu Uzala again - I saw it during its theater run. Vaillant quotes from Hadwin's missive, "The Judgement", but he didn't include the whole text in the book - and I guess the family has never released it. I like to fantasize that Hadwin indeed faked his death and is still out there somewhere.

"There are yahoos out there. It’s why we can’t have nice things." - Tom Mahood
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Pyrites
Member
Member


Joined: 16 Sep 2014
Posts: 1884 | TRs | Pics
Location: South Sound
Pyrites
Member
PostMon Jun 22, 2020 7:10 pm 
Using 1% of all B.C. forests as a measurement of lowland old growth forests is not a helpful measurement. British Columbia has huge areas of interior forests that are quite different than the coastal forests. To start with large areas interior forests have enough precipitation to be forested, just. There’s large variation in forest type with latitude. Natural tree cover at Blaine WA is different than that at San Francisco CA. B.C. extends about that distance N & S. If you’re talking lowland coastal forests, use that as baseline. To include forests around Merritt or Alexis Creek or Smithers is just not meaningful. Best.

Keep Calm and Carry On? Heck No. Stay Excited and Get Outside!
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Full Moon Saloon > Less than 1% of all forests in British Columbia are large, lower elevation old growth
  Happy Birthday Crazyforthetrail, Exposed!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum