Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
Cyclopath Faster than light


Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 6596 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
 |
Cyclopath
Faster than light
|
 Sun Apr 09, 2023 2:05 pm
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Randito Snarky Member


Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9201 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
 |
Randito
Snarky Member
|
 Mon Apr 10, 2023 7:57 am
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Worthington Member


Joined: 23 Jun 2021 Posts: 50 | TRs | Pics
|
I would love to hear a biologist explain why Grizzlies, if WA's Cascades are theoretically good habitat, have not similarly expanded south and west into this range in the 50 yrs they have been a protected species.
Wolves are obviously doing it without ever having reintroduction efforts in the cascades.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Randito Snarky Member


Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9201 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
 |
Randito
Snarky Member
|
 Mon Apr 10, 2023 11:36 am
|
|
|
Worthington wrote: | I would love to hear a biologist explain why Grizzlies, if WA's Cascades are theoretically good habitat, have not similarly expanded south and west into this range in the 50 yrs they have been a protected species.
Wolves are obviously doing it without ever having reintroduction efforts in the cascades. |
To what end? Are you even open to learning from a knowledgeable biologist? Or do you believe you have superior knowledge and experience to someone with a PHD in wildlife studies and years of professional field experience?
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Worthington Member


Joined: 23 Jun 2021 Posts: 50 | TRs | Pics
|
I'm open to learning from anyone, even a forum member without a PhD, as long as they point me closer towards understanding the truth.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bootpathguy Member


Joined: 18 Jun 2015 Posts: 1716 | TRs | Pics Location: United States |
Randito wrote: | Worthington wrote: | I would love to hear a biologist explain why Grizzlies, if WA's Cascades are theoretically good habitat, have not similarly expanded south and west into this range in the 50 yrs they have been a protected species.
Wolves are obviously doing it without ever having reintroduction efforts in the cascades. |
To what end? Are you even open to learning from a knowledgeable biologist? Or do you believe you have superior knowledge and experience to someone with a PHD in wildlife studies and years of professional field experience? |
Why such a hostile response? I think it's a reasonable question.
Why are wolves expanding so successfully and Grizzlies not? Habitat is supposed to be ideal for both species.
I'd love to know the answer to this also
Experience is what'cha get, when you get what'cha don't want
Experience is what'cha get, when you get what'cha don't want
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Randito Snarky Member


Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9201 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
 |
Randito
Snarky Member
|
 Mon Apr 10, 2023 7:20 pm
|
|
|
I'm not surprised that the Grizz population in the north Cascades of Washington isn't rebounding, after all the grizz population of the north Cascades in British Columbia is only six bears and those are considered critically endangered.
https://www.coasttocascades.org/populations
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Randito Snarky Member


Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9201 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
 |
Randito
Snarky Member
|
 Mon Apr 10, 2023 7:24 pm
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chief Joseph Member


Joined: 10 Nov 2007 Posts: 7172 | TRs | Pics Location: Verlot-Priest Lake |
They do that here in Idaho as well, they are paying a 2k bounty for wolves and allow trapping on private land.
Go placidly amid the noise and waste, and remember what comfort there may be in owning a piece thereof.
Go placidly amid the noise and waste, and remember what comfort there may be in owning a piece thereof.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
altasnob Member


Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 1136 | TRs | Pics Location: Tacoma |
 |
altasnob
Member
|
 Tue Apr 11, 2023 6:43 am
|
|
|
Grizzlies have thrived around Yellowstone, which shows, like wolves, once they populate an area with appropriate habitat their population will increase. But at Randy points out, they haven't populated Washington Cascades because there are so few bears just north of the border. From the National Park Service:
"The estimated Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem grizzly bear population increased from 136 in 1975 to a peak of 1,063 (estimated) in 2021"
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cdestroyer Member


Joined: 14 Sep 2015 Posts: 1159 | TRs | Pics Location: montana |
both wolves and cougars are hunted here in montana and occasionally bison.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bootpathguy Member


Joined: 18 Jun 2015 Posts: 1716 | TRs | Pics Location: United States |
1altasnob wrote: | "The estimated Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem grizzly bear population increased from 136 in 1975 to a peak of 1,063 (estimated) in 2021" |
I was reading about this the other day & I'm going off memory
1800-2000 in Montana
600 in Wyoming
35-40 in Idaho
In Montana, why just shy of a 100% increase in a year+?
Experience is what'cha get, when you get what'cha don't want
Experience is what'cha get, when you get what'cha don't want
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bootpathguy Member


Joined: 18 Jun 2015 Posts: 1716 | TRs | Pics Location: United States |
Experience is what'cha get, when you get what'cha don't want
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cdestroyer Member


Joined: 14 Sep 2015 Posts: 1159 | TRs | Pics Location: montana |
a bit much I would say, just how many bison do the indigenous people need?
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gb Member


Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 6143 | TRs | Pics
|
 |
gb
Member
|
 Mon Apr 17, 2023 7:44 am
|
|
|
cdestroyer wrote: | a bit much I would say, just how many bison do the indigenous people need? |
Just how many cows do white people need? A bit too much I would say.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|