Forum Index > Photography Talk > Digital Photography
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
Dean
(aka CascadeHiker)



Joined: 02 Mar 2002
Posts: 1967 | TRs | Pics
Location: ex Kennewick, Wa & Lehi Utah
Dean
(aka CascadeHiker)
PostTue Sep 10, 2002 8:48 am 
up.gif As always Tom, I enjoy your pics. One question that comes to mine is the vibrant greens your pictures display. Your pictures have such a lush rich color to them, particularly the greens and the blues. Is this normal with the G-2 or do you enhance them with photoshop? Thanks for always sharing your efforts.

Dean - working in Utah for awhile and feeling like it is a 'paid' vacation. http://www.summitpost.org/user_page.php?user_id=1160
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Tom
Admin



Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 17853 | TRs | Pics
Tom
Admin
PostTue Sep 10, 2002 9:46 am 
Thanks Dean. The only adjustments I usually make in photoshop are a levels adjustment. This basically adjusts the brightness / contrast of the picture but can have the side effect of making colors look more vibrant due to the improved clarity. I didn't make any major color adjustments or boosts to saturation to the Gold Lake pictures. I thought the green on some of the pictures looked a little "much" and actually reduced the saturation on a couple of them.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Backpacker Joe
Blind Hiker



Joined: 16 Dec 2001
Posts: 23956 | TRs | Pics
Location: Cle Elum
Backpacker Joe
Blind Hiker
PostTue Sep 10, 2002 3:51 pm 
Hey Tom, what digital camera would you recommend? I'd like to get into one say at least 3.3 or highter mega rating? I liked the soneys' that used their mini read write cd's, but they seem to be discontinued! Thoughts! TB

"If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide." — Abraham Lincoln
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Tom
Admin



Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 17853 | TRs | Pics
Tom
Admin
PostTue Sep 10, 2002 4:25 pm 
Kind of like which car should I buy wink.gif. It depends on a lot of factors. Do you like to shoot macros? If so, Nikon might be your best choice. Are you the "point and shoot" type who doesn't want to have to think about anything? If so, Sony may be the one for you (but uses proprietary memory stick and has issues oversaturating colors, particularly reds). Do you want a lightweight camera with excellent picture quality? The Canon S30 or S40 might be your best choice (but has a fairly wimpy battery). I'd recommend the Canon G2 if it were not for the fact it's already a year old (G3 is likely to be out soon), and I know you are a gram counter (G2 weighs over a pound). I suggest you do some research at www.dpreview.com.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Backpacker Joe
Blind Hiker



Joined: 16 Dec 2001
Posts: 23956 | TRs | Pics
Location: Cle Elum
Backpacker Joe
Blind Hiker
PostTue Sep 10, 2002 5:09 pm 
Looks impressive. How do you find the battery holds up? Do you carry spares? What memory type are you using, and what size? Army tanks for the info. TB

"If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide." — Abraham Lincoln
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Tom
Admin



Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 17853 | TRs | Pics
Tom
Admin
PostTue Sep 10, 2002 9:15 pm 
BPJ, the battery on the G2 lasts an eternity. I carry a spare just in case but I run out of memory before I run out of battery. I carry 512 MB of compact flash memory and almost always run out. Then again I take a lot more pictures than the average person - usually 2 or more of the same shot, particularly if it's a composition I like.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Backpacker Joe
Blind Hiker



Joined: 16 Dec 2001
Posts: 23956 | TRs | Pics
Location: Cle Elum
Backpacker Joe
Blind Hiker
PostTue Sep 10, 2002 11:32 pm 
That in itself (even by todays standards) is a hell of a lot of memory. What does that chip cost? I like sonys mini disc! TB

"If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide." — Abraham Lincoln
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
MCaver
Founder



Joined: 14 Dec 2001
Posts: 5124 | TRs | Pics
MCaver
Founder
PostWed Sep 11, 2002 12:41 am 
I've found that with my Olympus E-10 I can take ~100 photos before my 4 rechargable AA batteries are drained. The E-10 is known to be rather power hungry, though. I shoot a lot of photos on the trail, so I usually pack 3 sets of 4 AA for a day trip and I usually come home with batteries to spare. I have been known to shoot in excess of 1Gb of photos on a particularly good weekend though. eek.gif I only carry a 64Mb card, but I also carry a MindStor (used to be called Digital Wallet) -- basically a portable 6Gb hard drive with a PCMCIA slot. I have a PCMCIA adapter for my memory card, so I just shoot until the card is full (~25 photos), hook it into the MindStor via adapter and download the photos to the hard drive. Rinse and repeat. The MindStor also runs on recharables, but I can go weeks without juicing it up. Definitely not for the gram-counters, though. My tripod, camera and accessories weigh around 25lbs. Yes, I'm crazy. dizzy.gif Olympus E-10 MindStor

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Tom
Admin



Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 17853 | TRs | Pics
Tom
Admin
PostWed Sep 11, 2002 9:17 am 
Backpacker Joe wrote:
That in itself (even by todays standards) is a hell of a lot of memory. What does that chip cost? I like sonys mini disc! TB
You can get a 512 MB Compact Flash card for $140. Compact Flash is the way to go IMO (used in Canon, Nikon, Kodak, Minolta digicams). Sony's memory stick costs double that, and Smart Media (aka dumb media used in Fuji & Olympus digicams) though similar in cost to Compct Flash maxes out at 128 MB. Olympus is getting smarter and building their higher end cameras to accept Compact Flash cards. As far as the amount of memory I carry, it's not really that much. I shoot in RAW format (digital negative) which results in a 3 MB file size per picture. That translates to only 170 pictures which isn't that much on a long trip, at least not by my standards when less than 25% make the final cut.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Hiker Boy
Hinking Fool



Joined: 18 Feb 2002
Posts: 1569 | TRs | Pics
Location: Northern Polar Icecap
Hiker Boy
Hinking Fool
PostWed Sep 11, 2002 1:35 pm 
I use an Olympus C3020Z, 3.2 MP and 3x optical 2.5x digital zoom. I added a lens adapter and stepup ring so I could put a circular polorizing filter on it. I have a 62MB Smartmedia card in it and rechargeables that go forever. I bought it because it offered the most bang for the buck.

Honey Badger Don't Care!
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Alan Bauer
Member
Member


Joined: 11 Jan 2002
Posts: 942 | TRs | Pics
Location: Fall City, Washington
Alan Bauer
Member
PostWed Sep 11, 2002 1:41 pm 
There is no better way to get the greens and rich browns in our natural world to really pop and represent what our eyes see than to warm them up a bit for the film media being used. To that, I am someone who has a warming filter on every lens all the time...yes, all the time. Just a slight warming effect, mind you, in the 81a filter will create your images to be so rich. Take an image of a forest scene with and without one and look closely...you'll never switch back. Take an image of a marmot and compare with and without...same thing. Best filter I own to handle polarization is a warming polarizer such as the Moose Filter. Best of both worlds! If I don't have a warming filter on I have nothing...UV and Skylight filters are just extra glass to degrade an image and do nothing critical to help out...they are only pushed as "save the front of your lens!" add-ons by the salespeople of the world. Digital adds a bit of a challenge to this in that filters are not as easy to come by for P&S digital cameras. While I have a warming polarizer I can use on my Nikon Coolpix 5000, most often I just want the warming effect. This can be done if you have a camera that allows you to set a custom white balance on it. If you do, then go to the hardware store and get a pale blue paint chip from the paint color charts. By setting your white balance to this pale blue color (i.e. telling the camera that is what to represent as white) then your images will be taking out that blue cast that the sky gives to subjects, aka a warming filter effect! It is a wonderful trick and those paint cards are free...I just have one in my pocket with me. The Coolpix 5000 is a great camera except it sucks batteries badly. THis has finally be addressed with a new battery pack which will give me the ability to shoot much longer. I have a 640mg CF card I shoot with and a 320mg backup. Lastly, going digital SLR is a near term change for me coming up. My Coolpix 5000 is a compliment to my normal shooting slides with my Nikon lineup of cameras. The new Nikon D100 is very interesting to me, and being I don't shoot wildlife action much the slower "fast shooting" speed of 3fps bursts isn't much of a factor, so I don't need to spend the extra $1600 for the Nikon D1h. The Fuji S2 also is a great camera and accepts all Nikon lenses. Both are < $2000 now as well. Can't wait to move on up to that universe soon!

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Hodgeman of BC
Member
Member


Joined: 05 Sep 2002
Posts: 44 | TRs | Pics
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Hodgeman of BC
Member
PostWed Sep 11, 2002 3:51 pm 
Anyone have any experience with negative scanners? I was looking at a couple from Minolta. http://www.how2scan.com

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Brian Curtis
Trail Blazer/HiLaker



Joined: 16 Dec 2001
Posts: 1696 | TRs | Pics
Location: Silverdale, WA
Brian Curtis
Trail Blazer/HiLaker
PostWed Sep 11, 2002 4:11 pm 
I have the Minolta Dimage Scan Elite II. I have been very pleased with it. Its biggest drawback is that it doesn't have a bulk loader. It will scan 4 slides at a time and that works out to a decent compromise. At the time I purchased it, it was the cheapest film scanner that had FireWire. I don't even want to know how long it would take to transfer high resolution scans over USB.

that elitist from silverdale wanted to tell me that all carnes are bad--Studebaker Hoch
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Hodgeman of BC
Member
Member


Joined: 05 Sep 2002
Posts: 44 | TRs | Pics
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Hodgeman of BC
Member
PostWed Sep 11, 2002 9:28 pm 
Hmmm.... My 'photo guy' was talking about one, that will suck in an entire uncut roll of negs. I'll have to get a little more info

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Brian Curtis
Trail Blazer/HiLaker



Joined: 16 Dec 2001
Posts: 1696 | TRs | Pics
Location: Silverdale, WA
Brian Curtis
Trail Blazer/HiLaker
PostThu Sep 12, 2002 7:29 am 
If you want to scan lots of uncut rolls of negatives it would be well worth spending the extra money to get a scanner that could feed them automatically. In the Minolta Dimage Scan Elite II the negatives would have to be cut into segments before scanning.

that elitist from silverdale wanted to tell me that all carnes are bad--Studebaker Hoch
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Photography Talk > Digital Photography
  Happy Birthday Lead Dog, dzane, The Lead Dog, Krummholz!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum