Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
salish Member
Joined: 17 Dec 2001 Posts: 2322 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
salish
Member
|
Wed Jan 08, 2003 8:24 am
|
|
|
Went down to REI and bought my TOPO! Washington State edition yesterday. What a neat program. I'm still playing around with it, but I think I'm really going to like it. I think it's super neat to be able to make the kind of map that you want to, rather than rely solely on what maps USGS sells you. And the route finger thing is pretty cool, too. Wish it made more of a 3D presentation, but it will work just fine for me.
My short-term memory is not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my short-term memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
My short-term memory is not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my short-term memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Bard Guest
|
|
The Bard
Guest
|
Wed Jan 08, 2003 12:03 pm
|
|
|
3D or not 3D, that is the question.
Whether 'tis nobler up Sulphur via the slings and cameras of outrageous distortion.
Aye, there's the tub.
-- rubber ducky
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sore Feet Member
Joined: 16 Dec 2001 Posts: 6307 | TRs | Pics Location: Out There, Somewhere |
3d is just a novelty for me in those programs. I downloaded the demo of Maptech's software - with the feature that renders 3d in red and blue so you can look at it with 3d glasses and - which was immensely cool for just playing with, but the waypoint system in TOPO! is so incredibly useful to me, there was no question of TOPO! vs. Maptech (and Delormes was definitely out because it's slow and the quality of the scanned maps sucks). I only wish Nat'l Geographic would release the Canadian Topos with the same software...
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Admin
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Posts: 17851 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Tom
Admin
|
Wed Jan 08, 2003 3:28 pm
|
|
|
Sore Feet wrote: | Delormes was definitely out because ... the quality of the scanned maps sucks |
Having used both Topo! and Delorme's 3D Topo Quads, I'd say the Delorme scans are the lesser of two evils. They may not look as pretty as the Topo! scans, but you get much more detail when you zoom in (which is what really matters at the end of the day when planning a trip in challenging terrain). Topo! doesn't have full resolution (at least not in the state series).
|
Back to top |
|
|
Malachai Constant Member
Joined: 13 Jan 2002 Posts: 16092 | TRs | Pics Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny |
If you have a fast connection you can download the USGS DRG's for free from http://duff.geology.washington.edu/data/raster/drg/ they as detailed as the regular maps you can then burn CD's of them and use oziexplorer with a gps.
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sore Feet Member
Joined: 16 Dec 2001 Posts: 6307 | TRs | Pics Location: Out There, Somewhere |
Tom wrote: | Sore Feet wrote: | Delormes was definitely out because ... the quality of the scanned maps sucks |
Having used both Topo! and Delorme's 3D Topo Quads, I'd say the Delorme scans are the lesser of two evils. They may not look as pretty as the Topo! scans, but you get much more detail when you zoom in (which is what really matters at the end of the day when planning a trip in challenging terrain). Topo! doesn't have full resolution (at least not in the state series). |
Well, let's say it's a matter of opinion then. I've had both the statewide sets for Washington and Oregon in Delormes in the past, and I currently have both state series in Topo!, and, imho, the quality in Topo! is much better. I know what you're getting at with the zoom thing, but the pixelation that Delormes has at the 13/14/15th zoom levels is too much for me. With Topo!, when you zoom to 200%, it diffuses the pixelation, so it's easier to read (again, imho). As I recall, Maptech's scans were better than either Topo! or Delormes, but the program lacked key features I need.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brian Curtis Trail Blazer/HiLaker
Joined: 16 Dec 2001 Posts: 1696 | TRs | Pics Location: Silverdale, WA |
Tom wrote: | Sore Feet wrote: | Delormes was definitely out because ... the quality of the scanned maps sucks |
Having used both Topo! and Delorme's 3D Topo Quads, I'd say the Delorme scans are the lesser of two evils. They may not look as pretty as the Topo! scans, but you get much more detail when you zoom in (which is what really matters at the end of the day when planning a trip in challenging terrain). Topo! doesn't have full resolution (at least not in the state series). |
The Topo! regional series has higher resolution at full zoom then does the state series. You can load the disks onto your hard drive so you don't have to swap CDs all the time.
that elitist from silverdale wanted to tell me that all carnes are bad--Studebaker Hoch
that elitist from silverdale wanted to tell me that all carnes are bad--Studebaker Hoch
|
Back to top |
|
|
Geek God Guest
|
|
Geek God
Guest
|
Thu Jan 09, 2003 12:17 pm
|
|
|
I find many of these techno gadgets somewhat amusing. Recently I was on a winter slog up Lichtenberg Mt with a bunch of buddies.
In the old days, we'd get to the top, extract our lunches from the packs, and sit on them (the packs, not the lunches). Then we'd chat, enjoy the views, maybe wander off here and there taking in other views, and generally enjoy nature.
But on the recent trip, all the GPS enthusiasts spent nearly the whole time on the summit staring at their toys. What altitude did you get? Hey are we on the summit? (Of course, it was a perfect sunny day). Wow, it says on my map that I'm here. Ooh, check out my latest sternum strap, made from Unobtanium 468SX. Wow, where'd you buy those 95GXLIM590943-238485LKGFM boots, dude? Hey I just coated my compass (oops, archaic equipment) with bees wax imported from Upper Mongolia, which I got for 2% under wholesale from Dorkygear.com. It increases the accuracy of the compass 0.003 degrees over the bees wax that Joe Schmuck uses from Lower Mongolia or Pete Bagger uses from Mozambique.
Now doncha spend too much time on 3D maps -- go to the field and enjoy the real thing! Then when you get there, be sure to take lots of photos with your Pentium 2.77 Ghz digital cameras, which you can store 3,000 images on one chip, and then look at all your pictures while sitting at the lake!!
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sore Feet Member
Joined: 16 Dec 2001 Posts: 6307 | TRs | Pics Location: Out There, Somewhere |
Well somebody obviously didn't get any toys for christmas.
|
Back to top |
|
|
salish Member
Joined: 17 Dec 2001 Posts: 2322 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
salish
Member
|
Thu Jan 09, 2003 12:47 pm
|
|
|
Geek God wrote: | I find many of these techno gadgets somewhat amusing. Recently I was on a winter slog up Lichtenberg Mt with a bunch of buddies.
In the old days, we'd get to the top, extract our lunches from the packs, and sit on them (the packs, not the lunches). Then we'd chat, enjoy the views, maybe wander off here and there taking in other views, and generally enjoy nature.
But on the recent trip, all the GPS enthusiasts spent nearly the whole time on the summit staring at their toys. What altitude did you get? Hey are we on the summit? (Of course, it was a perfect sunny day). Wow, it says on my map that I'm here. Ooh, check out my latest sternum strap, made from Unobtanium 468SX. Wow, where'd you buy those 95GXLIM590943-238485LKGFM boots, dude? Hey I just coated my compass (oops, archaic equipment) with bees wax imported from Upper Mongolia, which I got for 2% under wholesale from Dorkygear.com. It increases the accuracy of the compass 0.003 degrees over the bees wax that Joe Schmuck uses from Lower Mongolia or Pete Bagger uses from Mozambique.
Now doncha spend too much time on 3D maps -- go to the field and enjoy the real thing! Then when you get there, be sure to take lots of photos with your Pentium 2.77 Ghz digital cameras, which you can store 3,000 images on one chip, and then look at all your pictures while sitting at the lake!! |
Hey, all I did was buy some software that will enable me to make & print my own maps instead of having to shell out $6 a pop....
My short-term memory is not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my short-term memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
My short-term memory is not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my short-term memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Odonata Member
Joined: 14 Aug 2002 Posts: 306 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Odonata
Member
|
Thu Jan 09, 2003 2:53 pm
|
|
|
Right on Cliff. If you have a computer and are a hiker, there is little argument against one of these programs. I use Topo but not with a gps. The ability to make your own maps and send them email to other Topo users is cool. As an arm chair route finding tool it becomes a highly addictive game. Its true that you can write on and compile your own maps from USGS printed maps, but the ability to scrawl and label all over a map and still have a clean copy is nice. And how many times have I hiked across a map and 3 inches into another, forcing me to pack an extra map. The sad part is I already bought 1/2 the state in 7 minute maps before I bought Topo. Hmm, no cpy protection on my cd's. I'm pretty rough on my maps so it's only a matter of time before some resemble parchment. I still favor a good ol compass, map, altimeter combo in the field
|
Back to top |
|
|
Board In The Eye Member
|
Geek God, don't you in fact use Topo! yourself?
|
Back to top |
|
|
-lol- Member
Joined: 17 Dec 2001 Posts: 767 | TRs | Pics
|
|
-lol-
Member
|
Thu Jan 09, 2003 3:57 pm
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Geek God Guest
|
|
Geek God
Guest
|
Thu Jan 09, 2003 5:48 pm
|
|
|
Hey Board, yup I do use Topo, and think it's the cat's meow. Was just ranting about wilderness techno gadgets. It's been a few weeks since I had a good rant and wanted to stir up trouble! I don't care for the 3D stuff on Topo. Rather just see the flat maps. What I don't understand is people staring at their toys on top a summit on a nice sunny day, showing everybody their pictures on their one inch screens, or analyzing all the data they have on board. Well, gotta go hop in the 4x4 and drive home from work in style, see ya!
BTW, got some awesome "toys" for Christmas, but not hiking related. Woo hoo!! yee-haw!! Hey
BTW #2, don't trust the mileage on Topo. It's ok for the shift-mode straight lines. But other lines seem to be off by a lot, at least compared to Geektails maps. Maybe Greentrails is off? But it's ballpark and better'n nothing. I really like printing the maps that spill over map boundaries too. Awesome feature. Compass, altimeter, and printed Topo! map is a great combo for navigatin'.
BTW #3: tip for abandoned trails enthusiasts: check out the smaller scale maps on Topo, which are way out-of-date 100,000:1 scale maps. Data from the 50's or earlier, and some really cool finds in there. Blow up to 200% scale, trace the olde trailles with route tool, and display on 7.5' map. Voila! Instant (slightly inaccurate but better than blank forest) olde traille data.
|
Back to top |
|
|
The bear necessities Member
|
Geek God, maybe you could use some of your powers to remedy the situation. Usually when I'm on a summit or at a lake, the fanciest thing I have is a Pargetter map. It makes a crinkly sound when you open it, but otherwise is pretty quiet. It relies on the reflective properties of light for me to read it but other than that is low tech. Having techno gadgets to tell you where you are, or perhaps where you aren't might be useful. I just upgraded to an LED flashlight. I had shied away from them for along time because I thought a LED flashlight would have an element of heaviness to it. Actually it is surprisingly light. But that is what I bought it for.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate NWHikers.net earns from qualifying purchases when you use our link(s).
|