Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
kleet meat tornado
Joined: 06 Feb 2002 Posts: 5303 | TRs | Pics Location: O no they dih ent |
|
kleet
meat tornado
|
Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:47 pm
|
|
|
So I'll ask you again BPJ, Quote: | Do you think you'll ever hear a person hired by a contractor for the Park Service ever say, "The reason I work at the park is to protect the resources so future generations can enjoy the place." |
? Hmmm?
Do you think you'll get a Quote: | skilled mountaineer with a doctorate in zoology, a licensed firefighter and an emergency medical technician |
working for the lowest bidder?
A fuxk, why do I not give one?
A fuxk, why do I not give one?
|
Back to top |
|
|
treewalker Member
Joined: 20 May 2003 Posts: 269 | TRs | Pics Location: Atlanta |
In a true capitalism, there wouldn't be such concepts as limited liability, subsidies, tax breaks or other ways that the government helps companies to avoid paying the true cost of doing business. Their costs are offset by forcing the american people to pay for corporations to destroy our environment, take away our rights, and then ship our jobs overseas. whatever we have in this country, it certainly isn't real capitalism and it STINKS.
I am all for capitalism as long as human rights and the environment are considered sacrosanct and come before corporate profits. Corporations should exist solely towards the benefit of society.
|
Back to top |
|
|
jenjen Moderatrix
Joined: 30 Jun 2003 Posts: 7617 | TRs | Pics Location: Sierra stylin |
|
jenjen
Moderatrix
|
Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:56 pm
|
|
|
BPJ, what makes you think that the consultants won't find a way to hang on once they figure out how to allocate the maintenance jobs? Contracts will continually need to be revamped and renegotiated. This will be a continual expense. That said, I don't necessarily think contracting out services is a bad idea. It seems like a lot of employees in the public sector cruise along doing the bare minimum in their jobs. I'm a lanscaper, if I worked at the same rate I see most county park employees work I'd be fired in a heart beat.
If life gives you melons - you might be dyslexic
If life gives you melons - you might be dyslexic
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stefan Member
Joined: 17 Dec 2001 Posts: 5091 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Stefan
Member
|
Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:57 pm
|
|
|
treewalker wrote: | I am all for capitalism as long as human rights and the environment are considered sacrosanct and come before corporate profits. Corporations should exist solely towards the benefit of society. |
I remember some Japanese businessman saying that an unprofitable company is a waste to society becuase in the end it wastes human resources.
|
Back to top |
|
|
CampChamp Member
Joined: 03 Jun 2003 Posts: 82 | TRs | Pics Location: Marysville, WA |
Just catching up on the threads and it appears that BPJ has been displaying more impulsive "Dribble" I believe is his word of choice. Joe you need to talk to MTN Goat about how to be an informed, thinking conservative. I think you have some people who want to hear from you:
kleet wrote: | So I'll ask you again BPJ, Quote: | Do you think you'll ever hear a person hired by a contractor for the Park Service ever say, "The reason I work at the park is to protect the resources so future generations can enjoy the place." |
? Hmmm?
Do you think you'll get a Quote: | skilled mountaineer with a doctorate in zoology, a licensed firefighter and an emergency medical technician |
working for the lowest bidder? |
jenjen wrote: | BPJ, what makes you think that the consultants won't find a way to hang on once they figure out how to allocate the maintenance jobs? |
Take it easy!
|
Back to top |
|
|
sarbar Living The Dream
Joined: 28 Jan 2002 Posts: 8055 | TRs | Pics Location: Freeland, Wa |
|
sarbar
Living The Dream
|
Wed Jul 16, 2003 2:19 pm
|
|
|
Hoo-boy, I opened a big ol' can o' worms when I posted this today-and I am glad I did! It is good to see others have my reaction to what the Adminstration would like to whitewash over! The NP system is far from perfect but it is something unlike anything else in the world-and taking it private is not what was envisioned when NP were created so long ago!
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stefan Member
Joined: 17 Dec 2001 Posts: 5091 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Stefan
Member
|
Wed Jul 16, 2003 2:30 pm
|
|
|
I have been in Italy and hiked in their national parks there. There are actually probably about 10fold more people who use the parks and hiking trails than we do. People exercise in Europe more than fat Americans.
The one thing that amazed me, was their lack of people patrolling as well as a permit system.
I find patrols and a permit system a waste of money by the park system. Mountain patrols as well as hiking patrols just do not make sense. Forget the "wilderness" designation. Its over people.
Our areas are not more pristine than parts of Europe. My opinion: The NPS DOES WASTE MONEY.
FLAME SUIT ON.
|
Back to top |
|
|
jenjen Moderatrix
Joined: 30 Jun 2003 Posts: 7617 | TRs | Pics Location: Sierra stylin |
|
jenjen
Moderatrix
|
Wed Jul 16, 2003 2:31 pm
|
|
|
Um, CampChamp, you quoted me a bit out of context. If you notice I continue in my previous post to comment that contracting out positions may not be a bad idea. A bit of nitpicking I admit, but taking quotes out of context is what gets people in trouble and starts arguments. ie Bush being quoted, correctly, as saying "bring them on", ignoring the entire rest of the speech this quote was taken from.
I'm not knocking rangers, I just think Government mucks things up more than it fixes them.
If life gives you melons - you might be dyslexic
If life gives you melons - you might be dyslexic
|
Back to top |
|
|
CampChamp Member
Joined: 03 Jun 2003 Posts: 82 | TRs | Pics Location: Marysville, WA |
To whom it may concern:
Write a letter or sign a petition. Give the Sierra Club your money. Do something about this. Just some suggestions. This administration is destroying (or making an effort to destroy) the whole National Parks System as we know it. Be aware of the consequenses and make your own effort to be educated about what is happening all over the country. Too much to list.
That's all I have to say:
http://www.petitiononline.com/SVNPS/petition.html
please read the above petition.
|
Back to top |
|
|
CampChamp Member
Joined: 03 Jun 2003 Posts: 82 | TRs | Pics Location: Marysville, WA |
I apologize, Jen-jen. Wasn't paying attention to what I cut off of your quote... I just wanted to make a point that BPJ loves to stir the pot, but needs to stick around to answer for himself...
|
Back to top |
|
|
sarbar Living The Dream
Joined: 28 Jan 2002 Posts: 8055 | TRs | Pics Location: Freeland, Wa |
|
sarbar
Living The Dream
|
Wed Jul 16, 2003 2:39 pm
|
|
|
Hey, Campchamp, thanks for the petion link I did it, and sent an email to a whole bunch of my hiking partners and others. At least it is a start, tiny as it is!
|
Back to top |
|
|
CampChamp Member
Joined: 03 Jun 2003 Posts: 82 | TRs | Pics Location: Marysville, WA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jenjen Moderatrix
Joined: 30 Jun 2003 Posts: 7617 | TRs | Pics Location: Sierra stylin |
|
jenjen
Moderatrix
|
Wed Jul 16, 2003 3:06 pm
|
|
|
CampChamp, understood.
If life gives you melons - you might be dyslexic
If life gives you melons - you might be dyslexic
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dante Member
Joined: 16 Dec 2001 Posts: 2815 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Dante
Member
|
Wed Jul 16, 2003 3:18 pm
|
|
|
Backpacker Joe wrote: | It sure the hell is better than any other system! |
BPJ, read THIS and then THIS. It is a critique of what currently passes for "capitalism" from a conservative perspective.
Here's an excerpt from the second article:
The new rules are:
Be clear about our options. The classic conservative analysis of economic issues is to identify the opposition's position as socialist and our own as capitalist, at which point it is obvious which one is preferable. But in fact there are now three different models contending for the privilege of organizing our economic life: capitalism, socialism, and corporatism. On any given issue, me must ask, is this really a question of capitalism vs. socialism, or is it really corporatism vs. socialism? Or capitalism vs. corporatism? Usually, from the point of view of our values, capitalism is preferable to corporatism, which is preferable to socialism. But let's not get suckered into defending corporatism under the misapprehension that it is capitalism. We currently do this all the time.
Be honest about our actions. Republicans always rant about big government, but government has grown under every single Republican administration since WWII and continues to grow under this one. We are a party of big government whether we want to admit it or not. Handouts will always be popular with their recipients. If you have a way to actually make Republicans reduce the size of government, I'm all for it, but until then, tell the truth.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brain Hates whining
Joined: 18 Jun 2003 Posts: 690 | TRs | Pics Location: Hillsboro, OR |
|
Brain
Hates whining
|
Wed Jul 16, 2003 3:21 pm
|
|
|
Am I the only one that noticed that the article posted was one of the most biased and unobjective pieces that could have possibly been written. It saw an opportunity to rip Bush and tailored the article accordingly. It would be interesting to see what the story would have looked like if it was written by someone without an anti-Bush agenda...maybe the privatization of the parks service wouldn't look so bad then and the benefits of doing so would be a bit more apparent.
"It appears my hypocrisy knows no bounds." Doc Holiday (Val Kilmer) in Tombstone
"It appears my hypocrisy knows no bounds." Doc Holiday (Val Kilmer) in Tombstone
|
Back to top |
|
|
|