Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
Zekester Suckin' wind


Joined: 20 Feb 2009 Posts: 379 | TRs | Pics Location: Everett |
 |
Zekester
Suckin' wind
|
 Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:05 pm
|
|
|
I was looking for a thread to post my latest Star Trail photo, but there wasn't a dedicated thread - so I made one!
Post your Star related photos here - Star Trails, the Milky Way, Astrophotography, whatever...
 Rattlesnake Mountain Star Whirl
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wazzu_camper Go Cougs!


Joined: 06 Feb 2008 Posts: 550 | TRs | Pics Location: Woodinville |
I've done plenty startrails over the years, but this is likely my fav.
Half Dome shot from North Dome.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bedivere Why Do Witches Burn?


Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 7464 | TRs | Pics Location: The Hermitage |
 |
Bedivere
Why Do Witches Burn?
|
 Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:20 am
|
|
|
I have yet to get a good star trails shot. Something always screws them up.
I have a few regular star shots I like, these two being my favorites:
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zekester Suckin' wind


Joined: 20 Feb 2009 Posts: 379 | TRs | Pics Location: Everett |
 |
Zekester
Suckin' wind
|
 Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:41 pm
|
|
|
Nice capture of the Milky Way!
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bedivere Why Do Witches Burn?


Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 7464 | TRs | Pics Location: The Hermitage |
 |
Bedivere
Why Do Witches Burn?
|
 Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:41 pm
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blastoh Member


Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 233 | TRs | Pics Location: Somewhere under the stars |
 |
blastoh
Member
|
 Fri Mar 15, 2013 8:06 pm
|
|
|
from sahale
 A sky full of stars over the North Cascades. The yellow glow on the right is actually light polution from Everette/Seattle over 75 miles away in a straight line.
also of sahale with the Andromeda Galaxy
 Sahale Peak above the Sahale Glacier. Above that, on the upper right hand corner, is the Andromeda Galaxy.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Dockery Member


Joined: 12 Sep 2007 Posts: 3092 | TRs | Pics Location: Lake Stevens |
Capturing better stars is one of my highest priority goals in photography, but I haven't had a lot of success. I've seen a few streak shots I've liked, but much prefer the more realistic look of sharp stars which requires high quality sensor (good high ISO) and a fast lens, and or an Astrotrac.
Here are a few of my best efforts, they look fine reduced size on the web, but wouldn't make good prints:
 My favorite so far - Rainier (with climber's headlamp streaks) reflected in Tipsoo Lk.  North face of Rainier  Shi Shi
Here is one of the best star shots (using an Astrotrac) I've recently found that shows what I aspire to:
 Bryce Canyon by Steve Perry
Steve has masterfully captured a beautiful foreground element that perfectly complements the stars and gives a fantastic sense of place.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zekester Suckin' wind


Joined: 20 Feb 2009 Posts: 379 | TRs | Pics Location: Everett |
 |
Zekester
Suckin' wind
|
 Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:56 am
|
|
|
I've read that star trails are a kind of "gateway drug" to night landscape photography...and I can see what they were talking about!
I've only done a couple of star trails - that one up top being the most interesting so far - and now I'm itching to get out to do some more. Too bad it's probably the worst time of the year for clear skies....
Now all I need a better DSLR, and a faster lens, and a lighter tripod, and.....
I did find this blog which was packed full of good tips on star related photography:
Star Circle Academy
They even have some webinars that look pretty interesting, too.
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blastoh Member


Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 233 | TRs | Pics Location: Somewhere under the stars |
 |
blastoh
Member
|
 Sat Mar 16, 2013 12:46 pm
|
|
|
Zekester wrote: | I've read that star trails are a kind of "gateway drug" to night landscape photography...and I can see what they were talking about! |
If star trails = pot
then
light painting = crack
and
timelapse = heroin
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zekester Suckin' wind


Joined: 20 Feb 2009 Posts: 379 | TRs | Pics Location: Everett |
 |
Zekester
Suckin' wind
|
 Sat Mar 23, 2013 1:18 pm
|
|
|
I thought the Nakashima barn outside of Arlington would make an interesting foreground. Unfortunately, the barn was much closer to the road than I had hoped and forced me to really crop my composition to avoid the lights from Hwy 9. I'm pretty happy with the results though:
 Nakashima Barn Star Trail
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Schroder Member


Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 6384 | TRs | Pics Location: on the beach |
 |
Schroder
Member
|
 Sat Mar 23, 2013 3:07 pm
|
|
|
My camera just won't do it.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gb Member


Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 6092 | TRs | Pics
|
 |
gb
Member
|
 Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:20 am
|
|
|
Jim Dockery wrote: | Here is one of the best star shots (using an Astrotrac) I've recently found that shows what I aspire to:
 Bryce Canyon by Steve Perry
Steve has masterfully captured a beautiful foreground element that perfectly complements the stars and gives a fantastic sense of place. |
That can't be done with photography, can it? There is too much detail in the foreground for a dark night. Split filter shading doesn't appear on the horizon line, so it must be a composite photo produced in photoshop.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Dockery Member


Joined: 12 Sep 2007 Posts: 3092 | TRs | Pics Location: Lake Stevens |
You're right gb, go to the astrotrac thread I posted last week to read Steve's description of how he made this picture.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zekester Suckin' wind


Joined: 20 Feb 2009 Posts: 379 | TRs | Pics Location: Everett |
 |
Zekester
Suckin' wind
|
 Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:06 pm
|
|
|
gb wrote: | ...it must be a composite photo produced in photoshop. |
Yep! I've learned that a large percentage of the really cool night shots I've seen are composites. Not that there's anything wrong with that, mind you. Photoshop is just the new darkroom.
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gb Member


Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 6092 | TRs | Pics
|
 |
gb
Member
|
 Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:31 pm
|
|
|
No, I agree. It is a really cool image. I guess what is real in photography is up to the artist's discretion. For myself, though, I tend to like images that look real, without noticeable flash fill or visible split filters, etc. But, I do admit to using split filters occasionally; but never more than one or two stop splits, sometimes stacked and offset so they are less visible.
Still, my best star streak image is a three hour job silhouetting an ancient bristlecone. And that is not what I saw either. So, there you go...
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|