Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
Ringangleclaw Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2010 Posts: 1559 | TRs | Pics
|
Would have been fun watching the helicopter fly in that mini-ex.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Klapton Member


Joined: 21 Dec 2006 Posts: 940 | TRs | Pics
|
 |
Klapton
Member
|
 Tue May 22, 2018 9:36 pm
|
|
|
Matt Lemke wrote: | NacMacFeegle wrote: | The unsustainable growth of our population is a problem |
I completely agree with this sentiment...will you join me in killing ourselves to help with this issue?
Like somebody famous once said:
"The best way to help save the planet is to kill yourself" |
I chose not to reproduce.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ringangleclaw Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2010 Posts: 1559 | TRs | Pics
|
Klapton wrote: | I chose not to reproduce. |
I'm sure the ladies applaud
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HitTheTrail Member


Joined: 30 Oct 2007 Posts: 5299 | TRs | Pics Location: 509 |
The latest development....
Excavator stuck in the wilderness
by Tony Buhr Sept. 26, 2018, 5:47 p.m.
LEAVENWORTH — How to remove an excavator trapped in the middle of the Alpine Lakes Wilderness, miles from any roads?
That’s the question that the Icicle-Peshastin Irrigation District and the U.S. Forest Service are asking. The irrigation district flew the excavator up to Eight Mile Lake in May to do emergency maintenance on the earthen dam there, said Tony Jantzer, Icicle Peshastin Irrigation District manager. Eight Mile Lake is about 40 miles west of Leavenworth and 3.3 miles from the nearest Forest Service road.
The irrigation district would now like to drive the excavator out of the wilderness area, Jantzer said.
But the Forest Service has some concerns about the impact driving it out might have on the environment and what laws it might violate, said Holly Krake, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest public affairs officer. It is working with the irrigation district to identify which route it plans to use to drive the excavator out of the wilderness area.
“We need to work in partnership with the irrigation district to identify that route,” Krake said. “Based on the proposal from the irrigation district, the Forest Service would be able to identify any potential environmental issues and any laws or regulations that might weigh in on that proposed action.”
Part of the problem is that both agencies have rights over Eight Mile Lake. Eight Mile Lake has been a reservoir maintained by the irrigation district since the 1920s, Jantzer said. But the U.S. Congress also designated Eight Mile Lake as part of the Alpine Lakes Wilderness area in 1976.
The Alpine Lake Wilderness is 414,161 acres in size and includes parts of the Wenatchee and Snoqualmie National Forests, on both sides of Highway 2. Wilderness are given more protection than national forests and activities within them are highly restricted.
In 1990 the irrigation district gave the Forest Service the rights over the reservoirs, Jantzer said. But it kept an easement to do maintenance and repair work, he said.
The irrigation district believes it can drive the excavator out of the wilderness area without permission from the Forest Service, he said. But it is still working with the Forest Service to find the best solution for both parties.
The Forest Service, though, wants the district to complete a permit application, Krake said. After the district completes the application the Forest Service can review any potential impacts to the wilderness.
“At this point in time we are working with the irrigation district and looking forward to their completion of that application so we can analyze those effects,” she said.
Alpine Lakes Protection Society President Rick McGuire said his organization doesn’t support any mechanized use in the wilderness area, but recognizes that the irrigation district might have a legal right to access reservoirs.
“Our position is that we don’t like seeing them drive things in and out of the wilderness, but there isn’t much we can do about it if they have a legal right to do it,” McGuire said.
The Alpine Lakes Protection Society was one of the key organizations behind the creation of the Alpine Lakes Wilderness in 1976. The society continues to advocate for protection of the wilderness.
If the Forest Service does not allow the irrigation district to drive the excavator out of the wilderness it may consider leaving it, Jantzer said.
It cost the district close to $100,000 to fly the 12,000 pound 305 CAT excavator into the wilderness area, he said. The excavator itself costs $24,000 and the district plans on submitting an application with the Forest Service to construct a new dam at Eight Mile Lake anyway.
“The district feels it is not cost effective to fly that thing out of there,” Jantzer said. “Especially when we know that we will be applying for a permit this year to replace the dam next year. If we can’t walk it out of there we’re going to leave it.”
The Forest Service has requested that irrigation district submit a plan as to how they plan to remove the excavator, Krake said. But she would not say what, if anything, the Forest Service would do if the irrigation district decided to leave the excavator.
Reach Tony Buhr at 509-664-7123 or buhr@wenatcheeworld.com.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Randito Snarky Member


Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9203 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
 |
Randito
Snarky Member
|
 Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:19 am
|
|
|
I know the FS has threatened big fines against Snowmobile riders who's machine dropped in a crevasse on Mt Baker's Easton glacier if they didn't extract it.
Many countries require a "return trip ticket" to be presented at customs to be allowed entry...
So did the FS issue a permit to fly this thing in, without requiring a provision for extracting afterwards? Or is the district trying an after the fact cost savings?
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ski ><((((°>


Joined: 28 May 2005 Posts: 12327 | TRs | Pics Location: tacoma |
 |
Ski
><((((°>
|
 Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:11 pm
|
|
|
Wilderness Act of 1964 Sect. 4 C wrote: | "...except as necessary to meet minimum requirements for the administration of the area..." |
Unless it's considered practicable and reasonable to repair the existing dam or construct a new dam by employing the use of shovels, it very well could be considered reasonable that the use of a 6-ton excavator is the "minimum requirement".
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
"I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each."
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CC cascade curmudgeon


Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 622 | TRs | Pics
|
 |
CC
cascade curmudgeon
|
 Wed Oct 03, 2018 12:01 pm
|
|
|
RandyHiker wrote: | Or is the district trying an after the fact cost savings? |
Not to worry, we (taxpayers) will be paying for it. All of the IWG projects will be financed from "public sources." District will put excavator expenses under emergency dam repair.
First your legs go, then you lose your reflexes, then you lose your friends. Willy Pep
First your legs go, then you lose your reflexes, then you lose your friends. Willy Pep
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Randito Snarky Member


Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9203 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
 |
Randito
Snarky Member
|
 Thu Oct 04, 2018 7:14 pm
|
|
|
CC wrote: | RandyHiker wrote: | Or is the district trying an after the fact cost savings? |
Not to worry, we (taxpayers) will be paying for it. All of the IWG projects will be financed from "public sources." District will put excavator expenses under emergency dam repair. |
Isn't the entire project "emergency" dam repair?
What I don't know is to what extent this emergency is just deferred maintenance that was deferred too long vs the IWG had wanted to do the repairs long ago but since it wasn't an emergency the USFS "minimum tools"" wilderness policy required the work to be done with hand tools or some other wacky scenario.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CC cascade curmudgeon


Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 622 | TRs | Pics
|
 |
CC
cascade curmudgeon
|
 Sat Jan 16, 2021 5:53 pm
|
|
|
First your legs go, then you lose your reflexes, then you lose your friends. Willy Pep
|
Back to top |
|
 |
trestle Member


Joined: 17 Aug 2008 Posts: 2069 | TRs | Pics Location: the Oly Pen |
 |
trestle
Member
|
 Fri Jan 22, 2021 3:59 pm
|
|
|
Randito wrote: | So did the FS issue a permit to fly this thing in, without requiring a provision for extracting afterwards? Or is the district trying an after the fact cost savings? |
Good questions, and seems like they should have been the first questions asked in the article, but what a nightmare of jurisdiction.
A little further in, thanks to CC, and it seems like the water district may have ultimate say on rebuilding the dam. But how did the mini-ex even make it there without a plan to get it back out? This is odd at best.
"Life favors the prepared." - Edna Mode
"Life favors the prepared." - Edna Mode
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CC cascade curmudgeon


Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 622 | TRs | Pics
|
 |
CC
cascade curmudgeon
|
 Fri May 05, 2023 11:14 am
|
|
|
First your legs go, then you lose your reflexes, then you lose your friends. Willy Pep
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate NWHikers.net earns from qualifying purchases when you use our link(s).
|