Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
Schroder Member
Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 6722 | TRs | Pics Location: on the beach |
|
Schroder
Member
|
Mon Nov 20, 2023 10:41 am
|
|
|
I noticed a photo caption in a documentary I was watching and looked up the photographer. There was a business in Snohomish around 1906 called Blosser Scenic Art Company and they did steroscopic photos in the area. Some of these are preserved in the Library of Congress.
Glacier Basin and Cadet Peak
A web search on J. A. Blosser shows other photos of his scattered on many websites and here's more on the Library of Congress
Slugman, Anne Elk, RichP
Slugman, Anne Elk, RichP
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Admin
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Posts: 17853 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Tom
Admin
|
Mon Nov 20, 2023 1:44 pm
|
|
|
Interesting, is there a way to view them in stereo?
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schroder Member
Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 6722 | TRs | Pics Location: on the beach |
|
Schroder
Member
|
Mon Nov 20, 2023 1:55 pm
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dick B Member
Joined: 06 Jun 2013 Posts: 345 | TRs | Pics Location: Redmond, Or |
|
Dick B
Member
|
Fri Nov 24, 2023 9:12 pm
|
|
|
Tom wrote: | Interesting, is there a way to view them in stereo? |
Way back when i was doing forestry work, we used aerial photos all the time to determine preliminary road locations, and future logging areas. We had to have stereo pairs in order to see the topo features. Photos were shot with special aerial cameras mounted so the photos we shot thru a hole in the underside of the plane's fuselage. The photos were exposed in a sequence along a flight line. They overlapped that allowed any object on the ground be seen from more than one photo. This meant that a portion of what was on one photo could be seen on the next photo but from a slightly different angle. That is the key to seeing in 3 dimension. In the field we used a small stereoscope which had folding legs and you could put it in your pocket. We had larger desk top models for use in the office. By looking thru the left lens with the left eye and the same with the right the image you saw was in 3D.
One summer I was on a job that required that we made frequent use of aerial photos. One day I was in the rig with time to kill, so I started to try to see in 3D without the aid of a stereoscope. I was quickly able to focus in on an image on the left photo with my left eye and the same image with my right eye on the right photo. The limit to what you could see was only as far as your eyes are apart. It was a really neat experience.
Unfortunately, I lost partial vision in my left eye several years ago which took away my depth perception and my ability to see photos in 3D.
If one were to get a print of the photo displayed in this thread and find a stereo scope you would be able to see it in 3d. Depending on the scope you may have to separate the 2 photos to get them to align with the scope lens. Or you could fool around and do it with the naked eye. I have done it many times in the past, but no more.
I'm sure the photo shown was taken with a special camera with 2 lens and was a special camera to only shoot stereoscopic images.
Let us know if anyone has any success. Oh yes. Does anyone remember the old Sawyer View-Masters?
|
Back to top |
|
|
IanB Vegetable Belayer
Joined: 21 Jul 2010 Posts: 1062 | TRs | Pics Location: gone whuljin' |
|
IanB
Vegetable Belayer
|
Sat Nov 25, 2023 11:55 am
|
|
|
I find it nearly impossible to "parallel" view as my eye muscles tend to go more cross-eyed when fatigued.
Yet almost all the stereo images I try to view resolve correctly and easily.
So I find it odd that the author writes that "Most Victorian and modern stereoviews are in the parallel-view format..."
"Forget gaining a little knowledge about a lot and strive to learn a lot about a little." - Harvey Manning
"Forget gaining a little knowledge about a lot and strive to learn a lot about a little." - Harvey Manning
|
Back to top |
|
|
cdestroyer Member
Joined: 14 Sep 2015 Posts: 1251 | TRs | Pics Location: montana |
stereoscope probably more commonly called stereo opticon. I have not seen one in many years.
after some research I realize I have been calling an object incorrectly...an opticon is more like a projector instead of a handheld device....my bad......
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kim Brown Member
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 Posts: 6899 | TRs | Pics
|
I purchased a book from Mtn Loop Coffee & Books several years ago - written by j. Harlen Bretz before he knew the water source of the Bretz Floods. In it was a set of maps 8 stereoscopic cards - the whole thing - book, maps, stereoscope cards - was in pristine condition. Stereoscopes can be found on line; I never bought one for the book, but looked at the photos using an old stereoscope a neighbor had.
Stereoscope cards were popular then; for maps, books, souvenirs.
Looking at the photos through a stereoscope is like looking at the old ViewMaster reels; 3D viewing.
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bernardo Member
Joined: 08 Feb 2010 Posts: 2174 | TRs | Pics Location: out and about in the world |
|
Bernardo
Member
|
Sun Nov 26, 2023 11:16 am
|
|
|
I turned my phone horizontal and expanded the images to fill the screen. I then tried to stare at the two images through my left and right eyes separately and after a few moments the three men in the foreground stood out. It helped to hold the phone at half arm’s length. Once you feel it snap into 3-D don’t let go. Move your head a bit. Mesmerizing and very cool. Thanks for posting.
|
Back to top |
|
|
mike Member
Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 6398 | TRs | Pics Location: SJIsl |
|
mike
Member
|
Sun Nov 26, 2023 12:27 pm
|
|
|
Dick B wrote: | Way back when i was doing forestry work, we used aerial photos all the time to determine preliminary road locations, and future logging areas. We had to have stereo pairs in order to see the topo features...... |
I did the same thing. Estimating timber volume and species. I had stereo pairs from Mt Si to the Canadian border. Also for much of Vancouver Island as the company had purchased a bunch of land from Mc-Blo.
I used something like this:
Carried something like this in the field:
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dick B Member
Joined: 06 Jun 2013 Posts: 345 | TRs | Pics Location: Redmond, Or |
|
Dick B
Member
|
Sun Nov 26, 2023 8:29 pm
|
|
|
Tom wrote: | Interesting, is there a way to view them in stereo? |
If the naked Eye method doesn't work, here is what I would suggest. Go on EBay and plug in "Pocket Stereoscopes" There will be all kinds of models. The ones I always used in the field were made by Abrams. There are some available that are army surplus. Several are for sale at prices ranging from $15 to $35. I believe these models would be perfect to view the attached photo and any others that you can download off the JA Blosser site. There looks like a lot of pictures available that would be interesting in seeing in 3D. I wish I could see out of both eyes. If it were so I would get a stereoscope, obtain the pictures, and view them in a NY minute. I don't know the procedure for downloading and printing the pictures which you would have to do to view them.
There are 2 other sources for new scopes. Topcon sells models from $64 to $72. and Sokkia @$70. Google pocket stereoscopes.
Let us know how you make out.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bowregard Member
Joined: 05 Feb 2019 Posts: 562 | TRs | Pics Location: Sammamish |
My FIL has a stereoscope and a number of cards to view with it that have the same format. He was not around in 1906 so I assume it was either an antique he purchased or was passed down in the family.
Thanks for posting.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dick B Member
Joined: 06 Jun 2013 Posts: 345 | TRs | Pics Location: Redmond, Or |
|
Dick B
Member
|
Tue Nov 28, 2023 1:18 pm
|
|
|
Here is a suggestion for those that like to take pictures and can get access to a stereo viewer. On your next hike take a picture of a scene, then move the camera a couple of inches to the right and take another. You will have created a stereo pair. Get the 2 pictures printed, then view thru the viewer, left pic on the left right on the right. The result should be in 3D. You could also to try to view without a viewer.
There are many beautiful pictures posted by folks on this forum. I think you might enjoy your pictures even more if you could view in 3 dimension.
I wish I could show proof that this might work, but with mono vision it is not possible. Let us know the results.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Admin
Joined: 15 Dec 2001 Posts: 17853 | TRs | Pics
|
|
Tom
Admin
|
Tue Nov 28, 2023 1:33 pm
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
catsp Member
Joined: 15 Jun 2017 Posts: 225 | TRs | Pics
|
|
catsp
Member
|
Thu Nov 30, 2023 12:12 pm
|
|
|
Ah yes, it brings back memories of the old Meta Quest 2. Anyone remember that old thing?
Nice little video explanation and helpful hints here: The science behind the Magic Eye craze of the 1990s.
BTW, little tip for anyone having trouble free eyeing it: Try adjusting the size of the pic. If you're trying it on your desktop, for example, the pic might be too big for your eye spacing.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dick B Member
Joined: 06 Jun 2013 Posts: 345 | TRs | Pics Location: Redmond, Or |
|
Dick B
Member
|
Thu Nov 30, 2023 2:18 pm
|
|
|
Professionally shot aerial photos came from a camera that made a 9x9 contact print. in order to view it with the free eye method, or with a pocket stereo, the portions of the 2 photos that were to be seen in stereo could only be as far apart as your eyes. Therefore, one of the photos had to be curled up and moved around until the
co-imagery superimposed on each other. The desk top stereos with the mirrors, allowed a much wider separation of the stereo pairs. As I remember I could lay a stereo pair under the scope and it would pick up the stereo imagery for the entire portions of the 2 photos that were on both prints.
It's been a long time since I viewed a stereo pair without a scope, but here is what I think I remember. What I would do is stare off in the distance, so my eyes were aligned in a parallel mode. Then, at arm's length, I would slowly lift the photos into my line of vision, while concentrating on still staring straight ahead. In a little while I was able to view the left photo with my left eye and right with my right. I would then see the 2 images as a single miraged image. The trick then was to be able to bring the images into focus as it was only at arm's length. Then the photos had to be moved slightly until the 2 images were perfectly aligned. When this was accomplished, I had a 3D image.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|