Forum Index > Trail Talk > Cruising down the Emmons un-roped
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
dixon
Member
Member


Joined: 24 Apr 2020
Posts: 176 | TRs | Pics
dixon
Member
PostThu Jul 14, 2022 8:10 pm 
Saw lots of chaos on Rainier this past weekend and the Rangers put out a blog post highlighting one of the issues - folks not roping up on glaciers. Recently there's also been an uptick in the number of climbers travelling un-roped, including climbers ascending the Emmons glacier to Camp Schurman, coming off rope as they descend the corridor, and even travelling off rope for their entire ascent of the upper mountain. This is extremely ill-advised. Significant hazards are always present in these areas, and with warmer temperatures the odds of punching through into an unseen crevasse are even higher. http://mountrainierclimbing.blogspot.com/2022/07/big-ups-for-staying-roped-up.html

HikingBex, awilsondc
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
DadFly
Member
Member


Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 402 | TRs | Pics
Location: Redmond
DadFly
Member
PostFri Jul 15, 2022 10:16 am 
If it ain't bison its crevasses. At least no one has tried to take their pet buffalo up the Emmons unroped.

"May you live in interesting times"

dixon, Chief Joseph
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Cyclopath
Faster than light



Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Posts: 7694 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Cyclopath
Faster than light
PostFri Jul 15, 2022 10:19 am 
I tamed a buffalo and rode it up Mount Adams and Baker, but it was afraid of running into Bigfoot on the Eminems Glacier so we didn't get Rainier.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Schroder
Member
Member


Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 6696 | TRs | Pics
Location: on the beach
Schroder
Member
PostFri Jul 15, 2022 10:39 am 
dixon wrote:
ascending the Emmons glacier to Camp Schurman
Is this an error or is this the way people are going now? You normally go up Glacier Basin Trail and Inter Glacier to Schurman. I've never roped up on Inter Glacier.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
rubywrangler
Member
Member


Joined: 04 Aug 2015
Posts: 509 | TRs | Pics
rubywrangler
Member
PostFri Jul 15, 2022 10:46 am 
The route crosses over from Inter glacier to the emmons at Camp Curtis

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Schroder
Member
Member


Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 6696 | TRs | Pics
Location: on the beach
Schroder
Member
PostFri Jul 15, 2022 11:03 am 
rubywrangler wrote:
The route crosses over from Inter glacier to the emmons at Camp Curtis
Interesting. I've always gone over Steamboat Prow.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
DadFly
Member
Member


Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 402 | TRs | Pics
Location: Redmond
DadFly
Member
PostFri Jul 15, 2022 11:17 am 
I have done it both ways. The Emmons route is easier unless the moat is huge. We always roped up.

"May you live in interesting times"
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Randito
Snarky Member



Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 9495 | TRs | Pics
Location: Bellevue at the moment.
Randito
Snarky Member
PostFri Jul 15, 2022 11:28 am 
I think the big thing the rangers are concerned about is people traveling unroped on foot above Camp Shurman. PNW Tradition for skiers is to travel uphill roped, but descend unroped with two skiers carrying two separate ropes in their packs and not skiing too close to each other. But walking on foot on the Emmons is a different set of risks. There are some big ass crevasses on the Emmons and an unroped fall could be very bad. The Interglacier is different, it's is mostly static and fairly shallow, so the odds of falling more than 30 down in a big ass crevasse are significantly less.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Celticclimber
Member
Member


Joined: 04 Aug 2012
Posts: 329 | TRs | Pics
Location: Index
Celticclimber
Member
PostFri Jul 15, 2022 2:12 pm 
We were just at Sunrise Tues-Thursday (12th -15). From where I stood; it looked like the Inter Gl is a very steep up. In which case: I wouldn't rope up either. Sometimes a rope is more of a suicide pact, than a life saver. But as per the article. The Emmons is somewhere one should rope up.

Live every day like you will die to-marrow. For some day that will be true.
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
domaz
Member
Member


Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 131 | TRs | Pics
Location: Tacoma
domaz
Member
PostFri Jul 15, 2022 2:34 pm 
DadFly wrote:
If it ain't bison its crevasses. At least no one has tried to take their pet buffalo up the Emmons unroped.
Not a bison but apparently a skier took there dog up to Baker and let it run down through the ascending rope teams while he descended... from a trip report here https://www.mountaineers.org/activities/trip-reports/basic-glacier-climb-mount-baker-easton-glacier-5

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
HikingBex
Member
Member


Joined: 17 Aug 2020
Posts: 110 | TRs | Pics
HikingBex
Member
PostFri Jul 15, 2022 8:00 pm 
I went up the Easton route on Baker today and saw a number of interesting scenarios: -a team roped up on the way up, when the whole route was in shade & quite frozen, and then descended unroped when the route was quickly warming up in the sun -a solo climber who stopped to take an extended (>30 min) rest sitting at the lip of a crevasse -2 other parties headed up in the heat of mid-day unroped (and seemingly without a rope) Of note, it wasn't that busy of a day on Easton, so these folks made up a relatively large portion of people out today I'm relatively new to glacier travel & do try to understand how people make the decisions they do in the alpine but these were all head scratchers for me.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Randito
Snarky Member



Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 9495 | TRs | Pics
Location: Bellevue at the moment.
Randito
Snarky Member
PostFri Jul 15, 2022 10:24 pm 
The Easton is even more fun in the winter, when snowmobiles raz all over it's surface. Technically they aren't supposed to venture past Sherman Peak (10,000 ft elevation) but sled frequently get "lost" and wander up to Grant peak in their confusion. Occasionally a sled breaks through a snowbridge into a crevasse, the forest service will levy hefty fines if the sled is not recovered , which usually involves a powerful helicopter. As far as I know no "lost" sleds have fallen into a crevasse within the wilderness boundary. https://www.airmedandrescue.com/latest/news/us-navy-team-rescues-hiker-snowmobilers https://cascadeclimbers.com/forum/topic/23214-snowmobile-in-a-crevasse-on-baker/ https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink/topic?url=https://www.snowest.com/forum/threads/mt-baker-info.367250/&share_tid=367250&share_fid=657&share_type=t&link_source=app

HikingBex
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Riverside Laker
Member
Member


Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 2818 | TRs | Pics
Riverside Laker
Member
PostSat Jul 16, 2022 9:58 am 
Celticclimber wrote:
We were just at Sunrise Tues-Thursday (12th -15). From where I stood; it looked like the Inter Gl is a very steep up. In which case: I wouldn't rope up either.
The Inter isn’t super steep. It can be glissadable though. But we rope even on the Inter as we’ve seen crevasses on it.

Secret Agent Man
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Malachai Constant
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 16088 | TRs | Pics
Location: Back Again Like A Bad Penny
Malachai Constant
Member
PostSat Jul 16, 2022 10:02 am 
Back in the day (early 70’s) we had crevasse rescue practice on Interglacier, the cracks were at least a full rope length.

"You do not laugh when you look at the mountains, or when you look at the sea." Lafcadio Hearn

Secret Agent Man
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
gb
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 6303 | TRs | Pics
gb
Member
PostMon Jul 18, 2022 5:51 am 
I have experience with a near crevasse-fall on skis on Glacier Peak, Kennedy Glacier in early April, 1992. We had a rope in a pack and were ascending on skis when I turned sideways for a picture near 9000'. I broke a two foot bridge but spread eagled to stop myself. Below the two foot bridge was a five foot wide crevasse. I got the rope out of my pack and Carl drove his skis into the snow and braced and pulled me to safety. As I extricated, I looked into the crevasse hole and saw it was something like 100-200' deep. After that event, when I thought I was safe because of the time of year, I backed off on skiing glaciers. The upper Kennedy is very active and that spring, 1992 was quite dry (the driest until maybe 2015). My take is that the rate of glacial movement was greater than the rate at which snowfall was building bridges. I think the shape of a glacier (as well as it's activity) has a lot to do with the security on skis or foot. Convex areas of a glacier and increases in slope angle have the potential for rapidly expanding crevasses and thin bridges. Much of the Easton is an example of this. Concave areas of a glacier and lower angled areas can have very deep crevasses, but the cracks are often incipient. Centers of glaciers like the Coleman are examples of this. I still skied glaciers like the Interglacier and Whitman Glacier subsequently, but my boldness on more active glaciers has been much more cautious since that event.

zimmertr, dixon
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Trail Talk > Cruising down the Emmons un-roped
  Happy Birthday speyguy, Bandanabraids!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum