Previous :: Next Topic |
Author |
Message |
Hiking addict Cooper Warpula


Joined: 07 Mar 2022 Posts: 134 | TRs | Pics Location: Keyport Washington |
Why isn’t Mount Baker part of North Cascades National Park? I think it would be a fantastic park If it included Mount Baker. I sent an email to the White House about a year ago, it never got replied. Same with Mount St Helens, why isn’t it a National Park? I’ve been to about 25 National Parks, and half of them don’t compare to Mount St Helens.
To have a good life, you need to take risks.
To have a good life, you need to take risks.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Secret Agent Man Member


Joined: 24 Dec 2015 Posts: 184 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RodF Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 2593 | TRs | Pics Location: Sequim WA |
 |
RodF
Member
|
 Tue Jul 19, 2022 4:29 pm
|
|
|
Why isn't Mt. Hood a National Park? or Idaho's Sawtooths, Oregon's Wallowas, Wyoming's Wind Rivers?
Because Congress has not designated them so.
Because their state's Senators and Congressmen have not heard no public outcry for it, conducted public meetings to refine such proposals, nor sponsored such legislation.
Because there is no public sentiment driving them to do so.
Might this perhaps be because the entrance fees, reservations and hiking quotas on trails and campsites, imposed by NPS, dissuade much of the public from visiting National Parks?
Or the long lines of cars backed up at Park entrance stations every weekend may cause many to regard National Parks as sacrificial zones designed, like flypaper, to attract out-of-state tourists, so they can go elsewhere?
"of all the paths you take in life, make sure a few of them are dirt" - John Muir
"the wild is not the opposite of cultivated. It is the opposite of the captivated” - Vandana Shiva
vibramhead, DrScience, Chief Joseph, jaysway, tinman, Hiking addict, philfort, Malachai Constant
"of all the paths you take in life, make sure a few of them are dirt" - John Muir
"the wild is not the opposite of cultivated. It is the opposite of the captivated” - Vandana Shiva
vibramhead, DrScience, Chief Joseph, jaysway, tinman, Hiking addict, philfort, Malachai Constant
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Randito Snarky Member


Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 9076 | TRs | Pics Location: Bellevue at the moment. |
 |
Randito
Snarky Member
|
 Tue Jul 19, 2022 8:13 pm
|
|
|
dixon, labgirl420, RodF
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kim Brown Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2009 Posts: 6614 | TRs | Pics
|
check this out
Read down the page a bit to get to the land battle. Mostly industry, agency jealousy, and, truth told - fear of National Parks' habit of overbuilding.
I have a copy of the Ice Peaks National Park study under Secretary of Interior Harold Ickes - the Ice Peaks area was huge, and included practically the entire planet. (ask not, get not). There may be an be an online copy somewhere. (JSTOR?)
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
"..living on the east side of the Sierra world be ideal - except for harsher winters and the chance of apocalyptic fires burning the whole area."
Bosterson, NWHiker's marketing expert
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiliki Member


Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 2139 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
 |
kiliki
Member
|
 Wed Jul 20, 2022 8:16 am
|
|
|
Good comments already.
In most cases the USFS has been highly unwilling to give up lands to the NPS. There have been many legendary turf battles. MSH may be the exception as the USFS may be crying uncle here.
You'd also need politicians to back this, which means it needs to be a very popular idea across a variety of user groups and probably have a significant economic benefit to the local business community. I don't think we have that and it would face significant opposition from many, such as the snowmobilers that flock to Baker in the winter or other locals that just don't want more rules and regulations.
The NCNP superintendent (a former one) told me the biggest obstacle to an NCNP expansion was the otherwise conservation-minded people who wanted to hike with their dogs. That is very easy for me to believe.
Unlike MSH Baker doesn't seem to be an area where people are clambering for different management for any particular reason.
joker
joker
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mike Member


Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 6282 | TRs | Pics Location: SJIsl |
 |
mike
Member
|
 Wed Jul 20, 2022 8:55 am
|
|
|
kiliki wrote: | the otherwise conservation-minded people who wanted to hike with their dogs. |
Yep. Include me in that one.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Secret Agent Man Member


Joined: 24 Dec 2015 Posts: 184 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
kiliki wrote: | Unlike MSH Baker doesn't seem to be an area where people are clambering for different management for any particular reason. |
I personally would be happy if the Baker NRA was non-motorized and I know I'm not the only one, but I doubt that will change any time in the foreseeable future with how committed the snowmobile people are to it, and I personally don't care enough to make a fuss about it.
Chief Joseph
Chief Joseph
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Schroder Member


Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 6391 | TRs | Pics Location: on the beach |
 |
Schroder
Member
|
 Wed Jul 20, 2022 9:40 am
|
|
|
Secret Agent Man wrote: | I personally would be happy if the Baker NRA was non-motorized and I know I'm not the only one, but I doubt that will change any time in the foreseeable future with how committed the snowmobile people are to it, and I personally don't care enough to make a fuss about it. |
The wedge on Mt Baker where snowmobiles are allowed came out of a compromise when Baker Wilderness was created. It was the only way to get enough support for the Wilderness Area.
Chief Joseph
Chief Joseph
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiliki Member


Joined: 07 Apr 2003 Posts: 2139 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
 |
kiliki
Member
|
 Wed Jul 20, 2022 9:49 am
|
|
|
mike wrote: | kiliki wrote: | the otherwise conservation-minded people who wanted to hike with their dogs. |
Yep. Include me in that one. |
It's not the hill I'd choose to die on, but me too, generally.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cyclopath Faster than light


Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 6393 | TRs | Pics Location: Seattle |
 |
Cyclopath
Faster than light
|
 Wed Jul 20, 2022 8:56 pm
|
|
|
Hiking addict wrote: | Why isn’t Mount Baker part of North Cascades National Park? |
It was a compromise to get NCNP to become a reality. FS was doing a good enough job managing it that it wasn't really a priority, and there was a feeling that it was too similar to Rainier, NPS already had a stratovolcano in their jewel case.
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zimmertr TJ Zimmerman


Joined: 24 Jun 2018 Posts: 877 | TRs | Pics Location: Newcastle |
 |
zimmertr
TJ Zimmerman
|
 Wed Jul 20, 2022 11:41 pm
|
|
|
Make Rattlesnake Mountain a national park
|
Back to top |
|
 |
slabbyd Member


Joined: 21 Jun 2005 Posts: 278 | TRs | Pics
|
 |
slabbyd
Member
|
 Thu Jul 21, 2022 6:32 am
|
|
|
“Komo Kulshan: The story of Mt Baker” is an excellent and very detailed history of white peoples interaction with the mountain.
As I recall there was a very significant and sustained effort to make it a national park back in the day but failed due to just not making the list of parks being created at the time.
Cyclopath
Cyclopath
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DrScience Member


Joined: 10 Aug 2022 Posts: 2 | TRs | Pics Location: Olympia |
There's quite a lot of information available on how the existing national parks became national parks. Ken Burns' great video series is a good place to start, as is the Wikipedia page on any given park. Long ago (more than a century) parks tended to be designated in order to protect a site of great natural beauty, but that idea faded away after the Antiquities Act gave the President broad authority to confer such protection, and Teddy Roosevelt asserted that authority so extensively that it has never been forgotten. During the last half-century, most parks have been political creations. Theodore Roosevelt National Park exists, for example, because a powerful senator from North Dakota believed (correctly, it turns out) that giving North Dakota a national park would draw tourists and their dollars to the state. Experience has shown that National Park status is often a kiss of death for a natural area; it draws funding, tourists, highway construction, and visitor facility construction. The biggest challenge faced by popular parks such as Great Smokies, Yosemite and Mount Rainier is how to protect the park from its visitors -- and they face that challenge with fees, regulations, reservation systems, and a host of other restraints on visitors. Be thankful that Mt. Baker and Mt. St. Helens are not national parks. It keeps them pristine.
RichardJ, philfort, Cyclopath, RodF, Secret Agent Man
RichardJ, philfort, Cyclopath, RodF, Secret Agent Man
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Schroder Member


Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 6391 | TRs | Pics Location: on the beach |
 |
Schroder
Member
|
 Wed Aug 10, 2022 3:33 pm
|
|
|
DrScience wrote: | Experience has shown that National Park status is often a kiss of death for a natural area;
Be thankful that Mt. Baker and Mt. St. Helens are not national parks. It keeps them pristine. |
Nonsense. You're talking about the concepts of a century ago. North Cascades NP doesn't reflect your claims.
Personally, I believe that St. Helens should be a National Park but not Mt. Baker.
Cyclopath
Cyclopath
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|